Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:54:58AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:41:57AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: You missed the part where snapshots have caused deadlocks under varying conditions since day 1. They have never

SATA Failure Introduced between 6.0 and 6.1-RC1

2006-05-04 Thread Jared
Hi -stable! I'd like to bring something to the attention of -stable that was posted to -amd64 but has not yet being resolved: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=amd64/95554 I'm unable to test to see if this occurs on i386 aswell so am unsure if this is the right list to post to. But

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:21:59AM +0400, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: Hi! On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:21:39PM -0700, David Kirchner wrote: However, one could argue that as quotas worked OK in releases prior to 6.0 (and perhaps earlier), that there is a longer-term regression. In I'm

Re: em(4) device still 'freezes' on latset CVSup'd 6.x ...

2006-05-04 Thread Rutger Bevaart
Technically it's not routes that are not being updated, but a stale (outdated) ARP cache on the other hosts. The system with the new alias'ed IP needs to do a gratuitous ARP (broadcast ARP for it's own IP). As an intermediate solution you could flush the ARP cache on the hosts with stale

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-04 Thread Graham Menhennitt
David Kirchner wrote: This assumes that 6.1 absolutely must be released If you don't think that 6.1 must be released then just ignore it and wait for 6.2. If you like, you can even pretend that 6.1 never existed. Graham ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: FreeBSD 6.1-RC2 available

2006-05-04 Thread freebsd-stable
Scott Long wrote: FreeBSD 6.1-RC2 is available for download. This is the last RC before the release. Thanks, Scott. I've been running RELENG_6 (synching periodically) on my amd64 iNET2340 from FreeBSD Systems for some time now with no problems. (Though I have given up trying to get JDK 1.5 to

FreeBSD Handbook in Dutch

2006-05-04 Thread Polichism
Hey Folks, Is there allready a Dutch translated Handbook of FreeBSD? I know the project is started.. but I want to know how far the project is. And maybe I can help. Greetings, -- Harrie Bos ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-04 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 3 May 2006, David Kirchner wrote: However, one could argue that as quotas worked OK in releases prior to 6.0 (and perhaps earlier), that there is a longer-term regression. In fact, it seems that enabling snapshots by default appears to have caused a significant regression for quotas

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-04 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 3 May 2006, David Kirchner wrote: I wouldn't dare suggest that all bugs must be fixed prior to a new release, but I will suggest that releases could be delayed to fix critical bugs that, under a completely stock and default installation: stop the filesystem from functioning, report

Re: FreeBSD Handbook in Dutch

2006-05-04 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 5/4/06, Polichism [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Folks, Hi there, Is there allready a Dutch translated Handbook of FreeBSD? http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/6.0-RELEASE/usr/share/doc/nl_NL.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ I know the project is started.. but I want to know how far the project is. I

Re: FreeBSD Handbook in Dutch

2006-05-04 Thread Johan van Selst
Polichism wrote: Is there allready a Dutch translated Handbook of FreeBSD? I know the project is started.. but I want to know how far the project is. And maybe I can help. I believe the Dutch version is not fully complete yet (but almost). You can find it on

Re: Hyperthreading in 6.x ... still frowned upon?

2006-05-04 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote: Is it still something that I should disable, and, if so, how in 6.x? You should test it for the workloads you have, but most of the time, HT isn't especially helpful. AMD64 CPUs come in dual-core format rather than HT-enabled. If you've seen HT or

Re: 6.1-RC panic: mutex Giant not owned at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2037

2006-05-04 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 21:33 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:01:37PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote: Just had the following panic on 6.1-RC from source current as of 24 hours ago: db ex/s *panicstr buf.1: mutex Giant not owned at

Re: em(4) device still 'freezes' on latset CVSup'd 6.x ...

2006-05-04 Thread Antony Mawer
On 4/05/2006 6:20 PM, Rutger Bevaart wrote: Technically it's not routes that are not being updated, but a stale (outdated) ARP cache on the other hosts. The system with the new alias'ed IP needs to do a gratuitous ARP (broadcast ARP for it's own IP). As an intermediate solution you could flush

Re: FreeBSD Handbook in Dutch

2006-05-04 Thread Daniel Gerzo
Hello Polichism, Thursday, May 4, 2006, 10:53:14 AM, you made these points: Hey Folks, Hello! Is there allready a Dutch translated Handbook of FreeBSD? I know the project is started.. but I want to know how far the project is. And maybe I can help. I'm pretty sure that Dutch doc@ people

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-04 Thread Ken Menzel
The quantity of significant performance and stability improvements in 6.1 with respect to 6.0 easily justifies cutting a release: while it may not correct every problem, it fixes a very large number. Robert N M Watson Notes from a mostly silent freebsd data center admin: I am looking

Re: em(4) device still 'freezes' on latset CVSup'd 6.x ...

2006-05-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Rutger Bevaart wrote: Technically it's not routes that are not being updated, but a stale (outdated) ARP cache on the other hosts. The system with the new alias'ed IP needs to do a gratuitous ARP (broadcast ARP for it's own IP). As an intermediate solution you could flush

Re: em(4) device still 'freezes' on latset CVSup'd 6.x ...

2006-05-04 Thread Rutger Bevaart
On May 4, 2006, at 4:30 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: This is what we end up having to do ... but, unfortunately, that means getting ahold of our co-lo provider and asking them to do it ... they have always been most accomodating, its just one of those things that I shouldn't *have* to do

Re: em(4) device still 'freezes' on latset CVSup'd 6.x ...

2006-05-04 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 11:30 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 4 May 2006, Rutger Bevaart wrote: Technically it's not routes that are not being updated, but a stale (outdated) ARP cache on the other hosts. The system with the new alias'ed IP needs to do a gratuitous ARP

Re: em(4) device still 'freezes' on latset CVSup'd 6.x ...

2006-05-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Rutger Bevaart wrote: On May 4, 2006, at 4:30 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: This is what we end up having to do ... but, unfortunately, that means getting ahold of our co-lo provider and asking them to do it ... they have always been most accomodating, its just one of

system freeze

2006-05-04 Thread Gardner Bell
Hello List, I just recently upgraded my machine a few days ago to 6.1-RC2 and have noticed a problem when using pciconf to read the configuration space register of one of my network interfaces. Attempting to read the configuration space when the network is online produces the output I would

Re: em(4) device still 'freezes' on latset CVSup'd 6.x ...

2006-05-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 11:30 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 4 May 2006, Rutger Bevaart wrote: Technically it's not routes that are not being updated, but a stale (outdated) ARP cache on the other hosts. The system with the new alias'ed IP

Biostar Tforce 6100-939 AMD 64 MotherBoard

2006-05-04 Thread Stephen Clark
Hello List, Below is a patch to the nvidia ethernet driver to make the onboard ethernet port work on the above mentioned MB. How do I get this committed? Thanks, Steve --- nve/if_nve.cSun Dec 25 16:57:03 2005 +++ mynve/if_nve.c Fri Apr 28 19:42:36 2006 @@ -235,6 +235,8 @@

Re: em(4) device still 'freezes' on latset CVSup'd 6.x ...

2006-05-04 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 12:27 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 4 May 2006, Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 11:30 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 4 May 2006, Rutger Bevaart wrote: Technically it's not routes that are not being updated, but a stale (outdated) ARP

Re: ipw2100 vs ndis(4) -- does it work for anybody?

2006-05-04 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 5/3/06, Sean Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/3/06, Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/2/06, Sean Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ndisgen is broken on 6.1 RC1 if I remember correctly. ndisgen wasn't broken, wpa_supplicant was broken as it didn't recognize the ndis interfaces.

Re: ipw2100 vs ndis(4) -- does it work for anybody?

2006-05-04 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 5/3/06, Ulrich Spoerlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scot, Bill, Scot Hetzel wrote: You need to use the ndisgen script to create the NDIS kernel module for your card. ndisgen /compat/ndis/w70n51.inf /compat/ndis/w70n51.sys Thanks! Since when is this required? I think I never ran this tool

Re: ipw2100 vs ndis(4) -- does it work for anybody?

2006-05-04 Thread Sean Bryant
Fails on build saying that stuff is used but not defined. Lots of warnings all over the place. And the nic is 100% nids compatible. On 5/4/06, Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/3/06, Sean Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/3/06, Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/2/06, Sean

6.x on an IBM T42 laptop

2006-05-04 Thread Nik Clayton
I've got an IBM T42 laptop that's currently running 5.4, and it's working nicely at the moment. ACPI works well enough that suspend to RAM works ('zzz'), the audio works, USB devices are recognised, and the battery life's reasonable (with est enabled). Is anyone aware of any regressions in

Re: Hyperthreading in 6.x ... still frowned upon?

2006-05-04 Thread Jonathan Noack
Marc G. Fournier wrote: In 4.x, it was a 'shut it off' sort of deal .. my new amd64 don't appear to have it enabled, but my older i386 server that I just upgraded to 6.x does: user pid %cpu %mem vsz rss tt state starttime command root 14 104.0 0.0 0 8 ?? RL

resolver behaviour regarding searchlist and A/AAAA query replies

2006-05-04 Thread Jan Gyselinck
Hi, I was debugging some connection lag and I encountered some query behavior which seems unnecessairy in my eyes. The system in question is running one of the FreeBSD 6.1 prereleases, I've not verified this on any other version yet. The queries I see are these: 22:15:29.657232 IP

system crash during file copy to a floppy with bad sectors

2006-05-04 Thread Rostislav Krasny
Hi everybody, uname -a FreeBSD saturn.lan 6.1-RC FreeBSD 6.1-RC #0: Mon May 1 16:18:59 IDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 This system crashed during copying of one file (about 1Mb) to a floppy which has bad sectors. The floppy was mounted by mount_msdosfs and I

Re: resolver behaviour regarding searchlist and A/AAAA query replies

2006-05-04 Thread Mark Andrews
Hi, I was debugging some connection lag and I encountered some query behavior which seems unnecessairy in my eyes. The system in question is running one of the FreeBSD 6.1 prereleases, I've not verified this on any other version yet. The queries I see are these: 22:15:29.657232 IP

Re: resolver behaviour regarding searchlist and A/AAAA query replies

2006-05-04 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, On Mon, 1 May 2006 20:46:40 +0200 Jan Gyselinck [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jan What I find strange though, is the fact it's now applying the searchlist Jan to get an answer on the query. Other than the fact this could Jan potentially give unpredictable results in specific situations, I

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-04 Thread David Kirchner
Here's how to reproduce the snapshot deadlock I'm seeing, with 6.1-RC2 cvsup'd as of 5 or 6 hours ago: 1) dd if=/dev/zero of=/usr/bigfile bs=1024 seek=209715200 count=0 2) mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /usr/bigfile 3) bsdlabel -w md0 auto 4) newfs -U md0a 5) fsck -v /dev/md0a # ^C this after a second

Re: system crash during file copy to a floppy with bad sectors

2006-05-04 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Friday 05 May 2006 07:41, Rostislav Krasny wrote: write the same file to the same floppy I didn't run umount and it crashed again. Following are footsteps of the first crash, founded in the /var/log/messages. I hope they may help to localize the problem. From the log it looks like some VFS

Re: em(4) device still 'freezes' on latset CVSup'd 6.x ...

2006-05-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 12:27 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 4 May 2006, Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 11:30 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 4 May 2006, Rutger Bevaart wrote: Technically it's not routes that are not

Weird / FS behavior

2006-05-04 Thread Christian Lopez de Castilla Wagner
directory: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ls ~/S56/vcs/20060504/ 000_29.10.05_Meeting.vcs 019_24.02.06_Meeting.vcs 038_03.04.06_Meeting.vcs 001_02.11.05_Memo.vcs 020_25.02.06_Meeting.vcs 039_13.04.06_Meeting.vcs 002_05.11.05_Meeting.vcs 021_26.02.06_Call.vcs 040_14.04.06_Meeting.vcs

Re: Weird / FS behavior

2006-05-04 Thread Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
On May 4, 2006, at 10:30 , Christian Lopez de Castilla Wagner wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat S56/vcs/20060504/*.vcs S56/vcs/20060504/cal.vcs /: write failed, filesystem is full cat: stdout: No space left on device The shell expands the * after creating the output file for the redirection

Re: Weird / FS behavior

2006-05-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:30:23PM -0400, Christian Lopez de Castilla Wagner wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat S56/vcs/20060504/*.vcs S56/vcs/20060504/cal.vcs What is wrong with this picture: echo foo a cat a a :-) Kris pgpV2xSOdb7Uu.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Weird / FS behavior

2006-05-04 Thread Johny Mattsson
On 05/05/06 12:30, Christian Lopez de Castilla Wagner wrote: I'm posting this to -questions and -stable, since I'm not sure if it is a problem or if I'm simply overlooking something. You're overlooking something :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat S56/vcs/20060504/*.vcs S56/vcs/20060504/cal.vcs

Re: Weird / FS behavior

2006-05-04 Thread Christian Lopez de Castilla Wagner
Mattsson wrote: On 05/05/06 12:30, Christian Lopez de Castilla Wagner wrote: I'm posting this to -questions and -stable, since I'm not sure if it is a problem or if I'm simply overlooking something. You're overlooking something :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat S56/vcs/20060504/*.vcs S56/vcs

Re: 6.x on an IBM T42 laptop

2006-05-04 Thread Sean Bryant
Works like a charm. On 5/4/06, Nik Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got an IBM T42 laptop that's currently running 5.4, and it's working nicely at the moment. ACPI works well enough that suspend to RAM works ('zzz'), the audio works, USB devices are recognised, and the battery life's