Albert Shih writes:
I've nfs server running 6-Stable (5 April 2006) with some trouble but ...
well approx stable.
But today he crash again (after ~1.5 mounth).
Now I'm like have some advise :
1/ I can upgrade to 6.1-Release, but I've see many problem with
nfsd heavy load.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 04:09:14AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
So far 6.X has been for the most part stable as NFS sever for us.. but one
of our servers has been hanging crashing and NFSD was showing as status
GIANT... and locking.. It had 6.0 stable and upgrading it to 6.1 stable
(6-26)
I have a series of machines 6.0 stable (various dates), 6.1 stable (various
dates) that freeze if the NFS sever they are connected to becomes
unresponsive or crashes. Was able to confirm this behavior for both i386 and
AMD64.
A 5.3 machine connected to the same nfs server was able to umount
Rink Springer writes:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 04:09:14AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
So far 6.X has been for the most part stable as NFS sever for us.. but one
of our servers has been hanging crashing and NFSD was showing as status
GIANT
You'll want to upgrade to the latest 6-STABLE,
to reduce the symptoms of this problem
until the proper fix can be merged.
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/netperf/20060628-ip_ctloutput.diff
Thanks,
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
Index: ip_output.c
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
There was a request for Tor related problem reports a while ago, I
couldn't find the message again, but I believe it was posted here.
I'm very interested in tracking down this problem, but have had a lot of
trouble getting reliable reports of problems
Was it fixed after Jun 25?
This comment fixed it for me:
---
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:50:29 + (UTC)
From: Konstantin Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/nfsserver nfs_serv.c nfs_srvsubs.c
kib
Rink Springer writes:
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
sys/nfsservernfs_serv.c nfs_srvsubs.c
Log:
MFC of the temporary fix for nfsd leaking GIANT.
src/sys/nfsserver/nfs_serv.c rev. 1.165
src/sys/nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c rev. 1.141
Both
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:23:15AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
Rink Springer writes:
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
sys/nfsservernfs_serv.c nfs_srvsubs.c
Log:
MFC of the temporary fix for nfsd leaking GIANT.
--- Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a request for Tor related problem reports
a while ago, I couldn't find the message again, but I
believe it was posted here.
Is anyone on this list running a Tor node on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
or later with similar or higher load?
I am hitting
Peter Thoenen wrote:
--- Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
Is anyone on this list running a Tor node on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
or later with similar or higher load?
I am hitting the same issue still Fabian. I had that PR closed as
works for me with insignificant testing. I am still
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Peter Thoenen wrote:
--- Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a request for Tor related problem reports
a while ago, I couldn't find the message again, but I
believe it was posted here.
Is anyone on this list running a Tor node on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
or later
Sorry!
Here is the attachment
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 00F9AF98: 8645 1312 D249 471B DBAE 21A2 9F52 0D1F 00F9 AF98
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
Dear All,
Does anybody succeed to boot
Dear All,
Does anybody succeed to boot FreeBSD on an Intel Vanderpool
capable machine? My colleague tried it and the result is a BTX halt as can
be seen on the screenshot attached. He succesfully run unmodified Linux,
Windows 2003 under Xen virtual machines, but FreeBSD failed in the boot
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I think this is a useful activity, especially if you've already run
extensive memory testing on the box. If you haven't yet done that, I
encourage you to take a break from buildworld's and make sure the memory
tests pass. I spent several months
of this problem until the proper fix can be merged.
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/netperf/20060628-ip_ctloutput.diff
Thank you for the patch. I'll let you know in few days if the crash
occurs again. It's quite reproducible (crashed yesterday in the same
code path).
pgpeerBZV3ylV.pgp
Description
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 22:15, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 01:16:11PM + I heard the voice of
Eprha Carvajal, and lo! it spake thus:
I see no ACPI capability in the processor features
ACPI is not a CPU feature.
There is an 'ACPI' feature bit, but I think it has
Here is a link where you can find screenshot.
http://skye.ki.iif.hu/~mohacsi/freebsd/xen-vt-freebsd.png
I try to find a way to boot with serial console in order to capture the
first error message.
Regards,
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning
Greetings,
FreeBSD/amd64 6.1-STABLE (June 18, 18:44 US/Central), running on Intel
EM64T Xeons.
got a one-off bad pte panic, and when it tried to dump to a gmirror slice,
it hung.
Box had been rock stable. Had an issue with a neighbor (NFS server to this
box) box yesterday,
and had to force
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i'm using an atheros 5212 on 6.x release w/ the ath driver finding that i
need to bounce the card fairly often to keep the pipe from diminishing to
1Mps. is there a fix for this?
--
David Coder
Network Engineer Emeritus, Verio/NTT
Telluride, CO Washington, DC
haven't seen one of these in awhile ... June 15th kernel ...
Script started on Wed Jun 28 13:59:08 2006
You have mail.
pluto# kgdb kernel.0 vmcore.1
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined
symbol ps_pglobal_lookup]
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
At 3:34 PM +0100 6/28/06, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I wish I'd run the memory test earlier, but the lesson
is clear!
Is there something that I can run *from* FreeBSD, remotely,
to do this?
Not that I know of. In the past, the discussion has been
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
There was a request for Tor related problem reports a while ago,
I couldn't find the message again, but I believe it was posted here.
I'm very interested in tracking down this problem, but have had a lot
of
'k, now that I'm up to 3 6-STABLE servers that are deadlocking, I'm
spending time with the remote tech today to get a serial console put
online ... how do I drop into DDB remotely, where the serial console is
going through a Portmaster Terminal server? issuing CTL-ALT-ESC, I doubt,
will
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:29:04AM -0400 I heard the voice of
John Baldwin, and lo! it spake thus:
There is an 'ACPI' feature bit, but I think it has to do with
preserving the TSC rate while the CPU is throttled. It's not
required for core ACPI operation.
Ah, well, I stand corrected. I
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Are there any warnings on the console from WITNESS or other
debugging options?
I just got:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 1st 0xc3795000 kqueue (kqueue) @
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:1053
Jun 28
has anyone figured out why the em device 'hangs' for about 30-45 seconds
whenever you ifconfig alias a new IP on to the device?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Core dumps are somewhat unconvenient in this situation. Better,
sending report to me, follow my advise in
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-deadlocks.html
'k, I'm working on getting a serial console
Following hte instructions in the Handbook, I've added the following line
to my kernel config:
device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 flags 0x10 irq 3
but, when I try to build it:
config: /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/kernel:71: syntax error
*** Error code 1
so, obviously that is wrong for
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Are there any warnings on the console from WITNESS or other
debugging options?
I just got:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 1st 0xc3795000 kqueue (kqueue) @
Hi,
I have installed FreeBSD 5.5 . My computer is still not hooked to the
network. I would like to start working on it. what should I start with as I
have never worked with BSD before. are there any good tutorials to start
with?
Thanks
--
What we see depends mainly on what we look for.
-MIHIR
On 6/28/06, Mihir Sanghavi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have installed FreeBSD 5.5 . My computer is still not hooked to the
network. I would like to start working on it. what should I start with as I
have never worked with BSD before. are there any good tutorials to start
with?
FreeBSD has
Mihir Sanghavi wrote:
Hi,
I have installed FreeBSD 5.5 . My computer is still not hooked to the
network. I would like to start working on it. what should I start with
as I
have never worked with BSD before. are there any good tutorials to start
with?
Thanks
Start again, this time install
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
'k, now that I'm up to 3 6-STABLE servers that are deadlocking, I'm spending
time with the remote tech today to get a serial console put online ... how
do I drop into DDB remotely, where the serial console is going through a
Portmaster Terminal
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
Following hte instructions in the Handbook, I've added the following line to
my kernel config:
device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 flags 0x10 irq 3
but, when I try to build it:
config: /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/kernel:71: syntax error
*** Error code 1
so,
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
'k, now that I'm up to 3 6-STABLE servers that are deadlocking, I'm
spending time with the remote tech today to get a serial console put online
... how do I drop into DDB remotely, where the serial console is
On Wed, June 28, 2006 2:58 pm, User Freebsd wrote:
Following hte instructions in the Handbook, I've added the following
line to my kernel config:
device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 flags 0x10 irq 3
but, when I try to build it:
config: /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/kernel:71: syntax error
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
Following hte instructions in the Handbook, I've added the following line
to my kernel config:
device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 flags 0x10 irq 3
but, when I try to build it:
config:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 07:34:43PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
'k, now that I'm up to 3 6-STABLE servers that are deadlocking, I'm
spending time with the remote tech today to get a serial console put
online
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
'k, now that I'm up to 3 6-STABLE servers that are deadlocking, I'm
spending time with the remote tech today to get a serial console put
online ... how do I drop
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
Instead of changing your kernel config, edit the sio1 entries in
/boot/device.hints. (This assumes you left device sio in your kernel -- if
not, you need to re-add it).
'k, re-adding ... and I take it there is no more 'DDB_UNATTENDED' option?
In the last episode (Jun 28), User Freebsd said:
has anyone figured out why the em device 'hangs' for about 30-45
seconds whenever you ifconfig alias a new IP on to the device?
The em driver resets the card when you add an IP to it, and unless
you've configured your switch not to autodetect
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Are there any warnings on the console from WITNESS or other
debugging options?
I just got:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal:
Jun 28 23:01:19
Just got this on the console of one of hte servers that has been causing
problems ...
Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc0520e18(0xc8b223a0) 0.296959250 s
not a very informative error, and that is all that was there, nothing
before, nothing after ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org
Oh, wait, does this have something to do with the Deadlock options I just
added to the kernel?
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
Just got this on the console of one of hte servers that has been causing
problems ...
Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc0520e18(0xc8b223a0) 0.296959250
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:57:58PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
...
Yes. It's unusual, but once in a while I get a nervous serial port. If
you experience this, type Cont to continue, and then recompile your
kernel with ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER but without BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER. Here's
the notes
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
Instead of changing your kernel config, edit the sio1 entries in
/boot/device.hints. (This assumes you left device sio in your kernel --
if not, you need to re-add it).
'k, re-adding ... and I take it
Please don't top-post...
User Freebsd wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
Just got this on the console of one of hte servers that has been
causing problems ...
Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc0520e18(0xc8b223a0) 0.296959250 s
not a very informative error, and that is all that
Dan Nelson said the following on 6/28/06 3:52 PM:
In the last episode (Jun 28), User Freebsd said:
has anyone figured out why the em device 'hangs' for about 30-45
seconds whenever you ifconfig alias a new IP on to the device?
The em driver resets the card when you add an IP to it, and unless
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Jonathan Noack wrote:
Please don't top-post...
User Freebsd wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
Just got this on the console of one of hte servers that has been causing
problems ...
Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc0520e18(0xc8b223a0) 0.296959250 s
not a
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Atanas wrote:
I have some newer machines with 2 Broadcom chips on-board. I plan to
give them a try at some point in the future, but I'm not sure how stable
the bge driver is when compared to fxp and em.
I'm using the bge driver on our new HP servers, and haven't noticed
52 matches
Mail list logo
