Scott Long wrote:
Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
- Daichi Goto's unionfs-p16 has been applied.
- The Areca driver is 1.20.00.12 from the Areca website.
- sym(4) patch (see PR/89550), but no sym controller present.
- SMP + FAST_IPSEC + SUIDDIR + device crypto.
So: I've seen this problem on a few
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 07:09:15PM +1100, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
- Daichi Goto's unionfs-p16 has been applied.
- The Areca driver is 1.20.00.12 from the Areca website.
- sym(4) patch (see PR/89550), but no sym controller present.
- SMP + FAST_IPSEC +
I am trying to mount a SMB filesystem as an ordinary user (because
I don't want to give root to this particular person). Whilst
running mount_smbfs as root works, attempting the same command
as non-root consistently returns
mount_smbfs: can not setup kernel iconv table (ISO8859-1:tolower): syserr
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 07:10, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running a 6.2-RC1 box (cvsup'd today) that has two broadcom nics.
One is an internal network (nfs) and the other is external.
PF has this rule for all traffic on the private net:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/jails]#
D Greg Eden wrote:
D Hello
D
D I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via
D cvsup and
D buildworld. Since the upgrade I've seen an increase in the number of
D Input packet errors reported on the bge cards in on both boxes.
In 5.3-RELEASE the bge(4) driver did not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, December 13, 2006 06:13:22 -0400 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, December 13, 2006 05:36:13 -0400 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, December 13, 2006 06:24:40 -0400 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'k, I'm at a loss here ... no console, no comconsole ... how do I get in and
remove /boot/loader.conf on a remote server? :(
Is there some key I can
I'm running a 6.2-RC1 box (cvsup'd today) that has two broadcom nics. One
is an internal network (nfs) and the other is external.
...
Doing something like ls /usr/ports will just hang until interrupted.
Using tcp for nfs makes it workable, but very slow.
Oddly enough I hit precisely this
As Luke already pointed out, no-df on the scrub rule should help. As=20
for the bad cksum! - this is a symptom of checksumming done in=20
hardware. ifconfig bge1 -rxcsum -txcsum should get rid of them.
I am a bit concerned by this - we use a lot of bge interfaces, and I have
hardware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, December 13, 2006 06:31:44 -0400 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hate feeling panic'd, but I am ...
Figured to press space as it was booting, and got the:
boot:
prompt ... typing 'boot -s' tells me 'No boot'
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 12:05, Pete French wrote:
As Luke already pointed out, no-df on the scrub rule should help.
As=20 for the bad cksum! - this is a symptom of checksumming done
in=20 hardware. ifconfig bge1 -rxcsum -txcsum should get rid of
them.
I am a bit concerned by this
You are misunderstanding. The problem is simply that the bpf device sees=20
bad checksums as it sees the packet before the hardware has calculated=20
it. On the receiver the checksum will be correct.
Ah, gotcha. That makes perfect sense now.
-pete.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 04:12:57AM +, Tor Egge wrote:
Hmm, may be, since vnode must be interlocked by ffs_sync() after
MNTK_SUSPENDED set, and before MNTK_SUSPEND, mount interlock is not
needed in ufs_itimes.
Tor ?
If neither IN_CHANGE nor IN_UPDATE is set then it might be unsafe
Hi,
I have a customer with a server with an Adaptec 2100 SCSI card and 2 73Gb
seagates, running 6.1.
Now one of the disks has been acting up and disconnected from the Raid-1.
Customer got a call from the NOC that a server was beeping quite loud.
So I rebuild the RAID and stress tested it a
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
So the 1000$ question: is there any chance of getting at least the state
of the RAID and its disk out into the open? It shure would give me a
much better feeling, knowing that at least serious trouble would be
detected by me. Instead of getting this call from a NOC.
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 21:48, Bruce Evans wrote:
Memory barriers just specify ordering, they don't ensure a cache flush so
another CPU reads up to date values. You can use memory barriers in
conjunction with atomic operations on a variable to ensure that you can
safely read other
Dear FreeBSD,
Did something happen to the location for the pkg-descr so
that ports can't find it? The following happens to me a lot,
for many packages:
=== Installing for gmake-3.81_1
=== Generating temporary packing list
** Missing pkg-descr for gmake-3.81_1.
*** Error code 1
Stop in
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:13:11PM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
So the 1000$ question: is there any chance of getting at least the state
of the RAID and its disk out into the open?
It works fine here. I use this on systems with 2100s, and with 2010s.
cd
On 13 Dec 2006, at 09:18, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
D Greg Eden wrote:
D Hello
D
D I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via
D cvsup and
D buildworld. Since the upgrade I've seen an increase in the
number of
D Input packet errors reported on the bge cards in on both
Bruce Burden wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:13:11PM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
So the 1000$ question: is there any chance of getting at least the state
of the RAID and its disk out into the open?
It works fine here. I use this on systems with 2100s, and with 2010s.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Jim Pingle wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
So the 1000$ question: is there any chance of getting at least the state
of the RAID and its disk out into the open? It shure would give me a
much better feeling, knowing that at least serious trouble would be
detected by me.
On 12/12/06, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
UH, can't do anything if you don't give any information, saying its a
'box'
and it has an 'em' is useless. We have installed RC1 on a number of
systems without problem.
Yes, I understand that. I was after what info
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Pete French wrote:
I'm running a 6.2-RC1 box (cvsup'd today) that has two broadcom nics. One
is an internal network (nfs) and the other is external.
...
Doing something like ls /usr/ports will just hang until interrupted.
Using tcp for nfs makes it workable, but very
Why do recent kernels display the banner:
ath_hal: 0.9.17.2 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413)
on boot when ath hardware is not present? I'd rather have my dmesgs not
mention phantom hardware, especially in the GENERIC kernels.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Jim Pingle wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
So the 1000$ question: is there any chance of getting at least the state
of the RAID and its disk out into the open? It shure would give me a
much better feeling, knowing that at least serious trouble
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Jim Pingle wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
So the 1000$ question: is there any chance of getting at least the state
of the RAID and its disk out into the open? It shure would give me a
much better feeling, knowing that at least serious trouble
I pulled the scrub in all line and replaced it with a scrub in on
bge0. I don't really care about scrubbing on the internal network. All
works as expected now.
I dont really care about scrubbing my intrenal nbetwork either - but I do care
about NAT working on the outside, which requires
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 12:27 -0600, Wayne M. Barnes wrote:
Dear FreeBSD,
Did something happen to the location for the pkg-descr so
that ports can't find it? The following happens to me a lot,
for many packages:
=== Installing for gmake-3.81_1
=== Generating temporary packing list
On 07/12/06, Anish Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 December 2006 13:36, Chris wrote:
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:38:48PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kris a development on this, someone
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
It does make sense if thats the problem since the entire server even
locally stops working properly, and it always follows a unexpected
nfs/sshfs disconnection ie. network timeout.
I am now running 6.2-RC that has the new file and
Jack Vogel wrote:
I need the PCI ID of that NIC, just to be sure that I can't reproduce
this, but
I doubt it, pciconf -l
Here's the pciconf -l from 6.2-RC1, custom kernel (copy of GENERIC,
minus 'device em')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x chip=0x700c1022 rev=0x20
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:11:46 +1100
Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mount_smbfs: can not setup kernel iconv table (ISO8859-1:tolower): syserr =
Operation not permitted
As far as I can tell, this has been the case since 4- or so, at
least. Possibly as long as mount_smbfs has existed.
On 12/13/06, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
I need the PCI ID of that NIC, just to be sure that I can't reproduce
this, but
I doubt it, pciconf -l
Here's the pciconf -l from 6.2-RC1, custom kernel (copy of GENERIC,
minus 'device em')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0:
33 matches
Mail list logo
