On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:05:59AM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 April 2007 01:19, Scott Lambert wrote:
> > I've run into an interesting performance "issue" with ls on a
> > 6.2-STABLE box, web1. This box is going to replace my current 4.11
> > box, ns, and is not currently active. It
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 01:19, Scott Lambert wrote:
> I've run into an interesting performance "issue" with ls on a
> 6.2-STABLE box, web1. This box is going to replace my current 4.11
> box, ns, and is not currently active. It's running all the daemons it
> will be in production, but traffic
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FreeBSD STABLE"
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:19 AM
Subject: uid/gid lookups slower on 6.2 than 4.x?
I've run into an interesting performance "issue" with ls on a 6.2-STABLE
box, web1. This box is going to repl
I've run into an interesting performance "issue" with ls on a 6.2-STABLE
box, web1. This box is going to replace my current 4.11 box, ns,
and is not currently active. It's running all the daemons it will be in
production, but traffic is not pointed at it yet.
I don't think the gmirror vs. adapte
I am hoping someone here who has more familiarity with the ACPI
code can enlighten me
I have an internal bug filed complaining that FreeBSD disables
wake-on-lan on the hardware. This means that if you boot, say,
Linux, even Knoppix as a quickie, and then shutdown, if the
hardware supports it,
Gustavo Feijó wrote:
> Found the problem origin:
>
> Amavis
>
> Apr 10 13:34:02 serv01 amavis[26962]: (26962-01) (!!)TROUBLE in
> process_request: Can't create directory
> /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20070410T133402-26962: Too many links at
> /usr/sbin/amavisd line 4215, line 2.
>
> Searching
Found the problem origin:
Amavis
Apr 10 13:34:02 serv01 amavis[26962]: (26962-01) (!!)TROUBLE in
process_request: Can't create directory
/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20070410T133402-26962: Too many links at
/usr/sbin/amavisd line 4215, line 2.
Searching for solution
Any aid would be wellcome
Hi there,
I'm experiencing a kind of trubble i've never seen...
Till today 4am it was all working fine.
Now, with none chages, i'm having this message error:
Apr 10 11:31:22 serv01 sm-mta-rx[21328]: l3ADXMuQ024306:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, delay=00:57:48, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp,
pri=7053
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> All those things work only under i386 right ?
> There is no option VESA in amd64 ?
Right. Calling function in the VESA BIOS (which is 32bit
i386 code) is not supported under FreeBSD/amd64.
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29,
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 01:24, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> Wow. Somehow we've slipped through a one-year timewarp:
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 07:47:54AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 March 2006 07:40, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> > > After the last rebuild on my amd64-x2 box, both the nve ethernet
Hi,
A week old -stable panic trace inlined below. The kernel config file
is SMP + KDB/DDB options. Any help to debug futher is appreciated.
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xca78ed80 for > 5 seconds
panic: spin lock held too long
cpuid = 2
Uptime: 1
11 matches
Mail list logo