Here is another error that popped up.
g_vfs_done():ad2s1d[READ(offset=201363652608, length=16384)]error = 5
Its back to the Promise controller for more testing
Richard.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
6.2 appeared to fix the problem.. I successfully wrote a large group of
files with bonnie but 20 minutes after it was done...
ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=14607
It seems to hang more while sitting idle... pounding on the drive seems
ok, then again I could be hallucinating..
Thank you Jeremy for your reply,
Sorry I didnt incluce my version of FreeBSD, its been so long since I
posted to the lists I forgot to tack on a complete copy of my dmesg..
pele /root 126% uname -a
FreeBSD pele 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #1: Thu May 10 23:06:18 HST
2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, May 11, 2007 12:49:32 +0100 Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
>
>> Right now I am tracking two known issues with UNIX domain sockets in
>> RELENG_6:
>>
>> - Reported NULL point derfer
On 5/12/07, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
>> The speed improvements associated with these MFC's is minor; primarily they
>> are stability improvements under high load. There are major performance
>> improvements in the 7.x impl
On Fri, 11 May 2007, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : Yes, but Martin already showed it was using the i8254, not TSC; would
> : you expect the same effect using powerd with the i8254 clock? It seems
> : so, unless it's some problem with est and/or p4tcc under APM (canoworms)
>
> No. I would not h
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> : M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > Peter Jeremy wrote:
> : > : There seems to be a bug in ntpd where the PLL can saturate at
> : > : +/-500ppm and will not recover. This problem seems too occur mostly
> : > : where the reference servers have lots
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
The speed improvements associated with these MFC's is minor; primarily they
are stability improvements under high load. There are major performance
improvements in the 7.x implementation, especially for multi-core systems,
but I have no
