Hi list,
i've made the following changes to my /etc/rc.conf for a small appliance system.
fsck_y_enable=YES
root_rw_mount=NO
squid_enable=YES
sendmail_enable=NO
sendmail_pidfile=/var/run/sendmail.pid
sendmail_procname=/usr/sbin/sendmail
sendmail_flags=-L sm-mta -bd -q30m
So at the end, maybe we are two how couldn´t use p19 diff right.
My recent post about this patch and its no working state at th 8th of
June in this mailling list.
Dan
Kurt Jaeger napsal(a):
Hi!
I'm using unionfs on a recently (approx. 5 days ago) cvsup'ed
6.2-STABLE with the
Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use gtar (gtar because it has incremental
backups, and tar does not)
You _can_ use BSD tar for incremental backups. I do that
every day.
When you do a level-0 backup, simply touch a flag file
somewhere. Then when you do the level-1 backup, use the
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486
This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change current/
expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, many systems
to not get useless e-mail.
It's not
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486
This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change current/
expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, many
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use gtar (gtar because it has incremental
backups, and tar does not)
You _can_ use BSD tar for incremental backups. I do that
every day.
Yes, but that's not real incremental backup because
if you restore data you'll get a bunch
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486
This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:47:49 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486
This patch
On 6/20/07, Dan Rue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486
This patch was
On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Javier Henderson wrote:
So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too
broken to
complain?
If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or
without this patch.
I'm just referring to the assertion that the Unix model is to be
On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Kurt Buff wrote:
On 6/20/07, Dan Rue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or
without this patch.
Indeed, which is why this patch might not be such a good idea. In this
case, absence of evidence is indeed
On 6/20/07, Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Kurt Buff wrote:
On 6/20/07, Dan Rue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or
without this patch.
Indeed, which is why this patch might not be such a good idea.
On Jun 20, 2007, at 12:56 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
Currently, if you get no message from that box, *something* is broken.
I am not capable as a human being of noticing the lack of one
message, when without this patch I would get more than 2,000 each day.
The more likely is that the OP starts
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 12:56:46PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
On 6/20/07, Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I get a message every day saying No output, how do I know when a
failure has occurred? This patch changes nothing about that
behavior. Getting no message is equally useless in the
This is a no brainer. The patch seems to retain the current behavior.
The desired behavior is on a knob. It doesn't run enough to worry about
the extra cycles to run the conditional. A superficial googling will
show that emitting messages when there's no exception is a human factors
boo-boo,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I like Kurt's approach, having a mailfilter/script-pipe which could
remove dynamic variables like timestamps etc, and checksum it against
against a empty template to see if its deletable.
This also verifies that mail-delivery is working, and machine
Hi!
[on a bikeshed:]
3. Actual errors *will* be reported, and *will be read* if I don't
have to delete thousands of non-errors.
Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script
(grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for
expected messages, noting and
On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Daniel Bond wrote:
I like Kurt's approach
Well the goal is to allow either approach to work. Kurt is arguing
against this patch because it doesn't work for him...
having a mailfilter/script-pipe which could
remove dynamic variables like timestamps etc, and
On Jun 20, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
Would it help if everything is all right-mails would be easily
discerned from messages saying there is a problem?
Not for me. I would like to not receive mail when everything is
alright.
IMHO that way you could move the everything is all
On Jun 20, 2007, at 21:43, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Kurt Buff wrote:
Indeed, which is why this patch might not be such a good idea. In
this
case, absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence, which is
contrary to the general case.
You appear to be completely
Kurt Buff wrote:
[...]
Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script
(grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for
expected messages, noting and deleting them, with unsent messages
noted via an email and messages with unexpected content forwarded as
well?
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486
This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change
Dear reader ...
I have been fighting for a while to configure the the xorg on my laptop Acer
Ferrari 4005 Wmli, to be able to at least a clone of my laptop windowmaker
on the Other monitor that i have attached to the TV-OUT but with no luck. If
any one can help please do not hesitate.
Thank you
23 matches
Mail list logo
