"Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the tip there but I cant find any function called pty_create_slave
> in the source.
Just grep your source tree for occurrences of pqrsPQRS.
> Is this something that's possible on 5.x / 6.2 or something that will need a
> lot of work?
It
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:07:28PM -0400, Keith Mitchell wrote:
I'm running 6.2-STABLE from about 2 weeks ago. I looked and didn't see any
ata driver updates so I think I have the latest on the RELENG_6 tree. I
also booted in verbose mode and didn't see anything too
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:07:28PM -0400, Keith Mitchell wrote:
> I'm running 6.2-STABLE from about 2 weeks ago. I looked and didn't see any
> ata driver updates so I think I have the latest on the RELENG_6 tree. I
> also booted in verbose mode and didn't see anything too obvious but the
> mes
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:55:08PM -0500, Natham wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Im getting a Fatal trap 12 from a freebsd 6.2 release p7, how can i
> report it and get help??
Check
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html
on how to obtain needed information.
--
Yu
Hi:
Im getting a Fatal trap 12 from a freebsd 6.2 release p7, how can i
report it and get help??
Oct 2 02:39:37 freebsd kernel:
Oct 2 02:39:37 freebsd kernel:
Oct 2 02:39:37 freebsd kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Oct 2 02:39:37 freebsd kernel: cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
O
I'm trying to get a SATA DVD-ROM drive in an older system (Athlon-XP
vintage) and can't seem to get anything that works 100% correct. I've
tried connecting the drive to various SiL chipset sata controllers (they
have builtin raid0/1) and the card bios sees the drive and freebsd sees
the driv
Thanks for the tip there but I cant find any function called pty_create_slave
in the source.
N.B. Machine is running 5.4 but I also looked on 6.2 which we could upgrade
to but still couldn't find it, so I assume you may be talking about something
that's in current which we couldn't risk on this m
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 02:29:54PM +, Matthew Herzog wrote:
> Hello Beasties.
>
> I have attached the error text and my kernel config. The build seems to
> die while building ipfilter but I'm guessing that's not the real
> reason for it failing.
>
> Thanks for any suggestions.
>
> -- Matt H
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a known issue IIRC. See line 245 of tty_pts.c 1.16. Can be
> easily reproduced by killing the sshd while apps are still running in
> the shell.
It's not that simple. The question is why t_refcnt > 1 when there are
no processes left attached to the
* Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so
> > > > he can catch up with the
On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so
> > > > he can catch up w
* Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so
> > > he can catch up with the thread.
> >
> > Which symptoms? I can no longer re
On 10/2/07, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so
> > > he can catch up with the thread.
> >
> > Which symptoms? I can no
"Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so
> > > he can catch up with the thread.
> > Which symptoms? I can no longer reproduce the ha
On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so
> > he can catch up with the thread.
>
> Which symptoms? I can no longer reproduce the hang-on-close bug.
Strangely enough
"Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so
> he can catch up with the thread.
Which symptoms? I can no longer reproduce the hang-on-close bug.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Any one got any pointers on this, the machine we running this app on is over
> > 90% idle so I really don't want to have to install a second machine just to
> > workaround a limit on the n
On 10/2/07, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Alternatively, set kern.pts.enable to 1, and find and fix the
> > > > hang-on-close b
"Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any one got any pointers on this, the machine we running this app on is over
> 90% idle so I really don't want to have to install a second machine just to
> workaround a limit on the number of pty's, surely there's a way to increase
> this?
You need
On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Alternatively, set kern.pts.enable to 1, and find and fix the
> > > hang-on-close bug in the pts code (if it hasn't been fixed already)
> > Lo
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:05:03PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> "Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Any one got any pointers on this, the machine we running this app on is over
> > 90% idle so I really don't want to have to install a second machine just to
> > workaround a limi
Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Alternatively, set kern.pts.enable to 1, and find and fix the
> > hang-on-close bug in the pts code (if it hasn't been fixed already)
> Looks like it hasn't been. A friend who tried to set up an access
> ser
Any one got any pointers on this, the machine we running this app on is over
90% idle so I really don't want to have to install a second machine just to
workaround a limit on the number of pty's, surely there's a way to increase
this?
Regards
Steve
=
23 matches
Mail list logo