Re: date/time trouble - PST came too early

2007-11-02 Thread LI Xin
Chris H. wrote: Quoting LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Chris H. wrote: Any advice would be *greatly* appreciated. Install /usr/ports/misc/zoneinfo or upgrade your system to a recent release (preferred), e.g. RELENG_6_2 aka FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. Re-run tzsetup and choose your time zone

Re: date/time trouble - PST came too early

2007-11-02 Thread Chris H.
Quoting LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Chris H. wrote: Quoting LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Chris H. wrote: Any advice would be *greatly* appreciated. Install /usr/ports/misc/zoneinfo or upgrade your system to a recent release (preferred), e.g. RELENG_6_2 aka FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. Re-run tzsetup

Re: date/time trouble - PST came too early

2007-11-02 Thread LI Xin
Chris H. wrote: Any advice would be *greatly* appreciated. Install /usr/ports/misc/zoneinfo or upgrade your system to a recent release (preferred), e.g. RELENG_6_2 aka FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. Re-run tzsetup and choose your time zone accordingly. You will need to restart the time-sensitive

Re: Reproducable, possibly NFS related, fatal double fault in 6.2-R-p7

2007-11-02 Thread Chris H.
Quoting Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Chris H. wrote: -8SNIP8 I think that document explains everything that is necessary, but if you are unsure about something please feel free to ask. Good luck :) Kris Whooo Hooo! I crashed my server! Whooo Hooo! it made a big

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-02 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Jack Vogel wrote: Although I see it at least one person claims the message came thru with only the header file, so I am going to send if_em.c thru again. Jack ___ [EMAIL

Re: Source upgrade from 5.5 to 6.X not safe?

2007-11-02 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Clint Olsen wrote: I just attempted a source upgrade from 5.5-STABLE to 6.3-PRERELEASE, and it was a disaster, more than likely because I forgot to do something. Normally I'm saved by the fact that the operations are not so scary as to cause problems. Well, in this case after running 'make

Re: Source upgrade from 5.5 to 6.X not safe?

2007-11-02 Thread Josh Paetzel
On Friday 02 November 2007 05:29:03 am Clint Olsen wrote: On Nov 02, LI Xin wrote: So we get: - 5.5-STABLE works well on your box - 6.2-RELEASE stock GENERIC works fine - 6.3-PRERELEASE failed for some reason. So far as I am aware I have no clue why this could happen. Could you

Re: Source upgrade from 5.5 to 6.X not safe?

2007-11-02 Thread Cristiano Deana
On 11/2/07, Clint Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just attempted a source upgrade from 5.5-STABLE to 6.3-PRERELEASE, and it Well, in this case after running 'make installkernel' and rebooting, Did you reboot in single user? -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-02 Thread Jack Vogel
Although I see it at least one person claims the message came thru with only the header file, so I am going to send if_em.c thru again. Jack ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To

Re: Source upgrade from 5.5 to 6.X not safe?

2007-11-02 Thread Clint Olsen
On Nov 02, LI Xin wrote: So we get: - 5.5-STABLE works well on your box - 6.2-RELEASE stock GENERIC works fine - 6.3-PRERELEASE failed for some reason. So far as I am aware I have no clue why this could happen. Could you check if you have any special configuration in your

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-02 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 12:10:59AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: Although I see it at least one person claims the message came thru with only the header file, so I am going to send if_em.c thru again. Attachments are usually stripped off by the mailing list software, so you are probably better

Re: Source upgrade from 5.5 to 6.X not safe?

2007-11-02 Thread LI Xin
Clint Olsen wrote: I just attempted a source upgrade from 5.5-STABLE to 6.3-PRERELEASE, and it was a disaster, more than likely because I forgot to do something. Normally I'm saved by the fact that the operations are not so scary as to cause problems. [... restore old kernel worked; new kernel

Source upgrade from 5.5 to 6.X not safe?

2007-11-02 Thread Clint Olsen
I just attempted a source upgrade from 5.5-STABLE to 6.3-PRERELEASE, and it was a disaster, more than likely because I forgot to do something. Normally I'm saved by the fact that the operations are not so scary as to cause problems. Well, in this case after running 'make installkernel' and

Re: date/time trouble - PST came too early [fixed]

2007-11-02 Thread Chris H.
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Quoting LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Chris H. wrote: Quoting LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Chris H. wrote: Any advice would be *greatly* appreciated. Install /usr/ports/misc/zoneinfo or upgrade your system to a recent release (preferred), e.g. RELENG_6_2 aka

Re: usb keyboard FreeBSD 7.0-BETA1

2007-11-02 Thread Momchil Ivanov
На Friday 02 November 2007 01:13:06 Paul Fraser написа: For the sake of the record, I also have this problem. Have you tried this one http://selasky.org/hans_petter/usb4bsd/index.html ? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: date/time trouble - PST came too early

2007-11-02 Thread Chris H.
Quoting LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Chris H. wrote: Any advice would be *greatly* appreciated. Install /usr/ports/misc/zoneinfo or upgrade your system to a recent release (preferred), e.g. RELENG_6_2 aka FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. Re-run tzsetup and choose your time zone accordingly. You will need

Re: /usr/share/man/man8/MAKEDEV.8

2007-11-02 Thread Alex Zbyslaw
Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 01:43:41PM +0100 I heard the voice of Bernd Walter, and lo! it spake thus: Show me the positives that outweights the negatives and I'm on your side. Why do you think we're on different sides to begin with? I've not advocated removing catman

Re: Bug

2007-11-02 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Michael wrote: Hello, i know that you are working on freebsd scheduler, probably this bug have relation to your work: After upgrading to Freebsd 7 (from RELENG_6), postgresql coredumps several times per day. I asked mail list pgsql-bugs and got answer that this is probably

Re: [FreeBSD 7.0-BETA1] strange behavior in hostname resolving order

2007-11-02 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:05:07 +0900 Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: bh To Whom It May Concern: (Cc'ed [EMAIL PROTECTED]) bh Usually i prefer 6to4(stf(4)) to 6over4(gif(4)) because some bh tunnel providers like to limit bandwidth too musch. So until my bh upstream ISP give me

Another send of EM test change

2007-11-02 Thread Jack Vogel
It seems that some mailer is stripping source attachments, so I'm sending this in an archive. NOTE: the attachment is a bz2, rename to extract it. Jack test-em Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-02 Thread Jack Vogel
So at this point I'm unclear, with my reposting of if_em.c last night has everyone seen both parts or do I have to try something else? Jack ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To

em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting revisited

2007-11-02 Thread Ted Strzalkowski
I am having some issues with the em(4) card. I am getting the em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting error. The box has a DFI KT600-AL mobo and a Intel Pro/1000 GT nic. I am running 6.2-RELEASE. I have rma'd the card twice already and get the same error. I've tried different PCI ports, different

[FreeBSD 7.0-BETA1] strange behavior in hostname resolving order

2007-11-02 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
To Whom It May Concern: (Cc'ed [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Usually i prefer 6to4(stf(4)) to 6over4(gif(4)) because some tunnel providers like to limit bandwidth too musch. So until my upstream ISP give me native ipv6 addresses (it's take long time maybe), i'm going to use 6to4 instead of 6over4

[SOLVED] (Was: Re: [FreeBSD 7.0-BETA1] strange behavior in hostname resolving order)

2007-11-02 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
Dear Mr. UMEMOTO, On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 00:58 +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: Hi, On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:05:07 +0900 Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: bh To Whom It May Concern: (Cc'ed [EMAIL PROTECTED]) bh Usually i prefer 6to4(stf(4)) to 6over4(gif(4)) because some bh tunnel

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-02 Thread Mike Tancsa
/freebsd-stable/2007-November/037936.html 0[releng6-865]% tar -pxzf p.tgz 0[releng6-865]% 0[releng6-865]% 0[releng6-865]% fetch -o p.tgz http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20071102/e68d41b4/test-em.obj p.tgz 100% of 33 kB 17

Re: Another send of EM test change

2007-11-02 Thread Pete French
Thanks, that worked ifne, am just compiling them now to try... -pete. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-02 Thread Julian Elischer
Mike Tancsa wrote: At 12:33 PM 11/2/2007, Jack Vogel wrote: So at this point I'm unclear, with my reposting of if_em.c last night has everyone seen both parts or do I have to try something else? I never saw a .c file so put them in ~/public_html on freefall and they can be accessed as:

Re: /usr/share/man/man8/MAKEDEV.8

2007-11-02 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 11:28:43AM + I heard the voice of Alex Zbyslaw, and lo! it spake thus: In addition, considering an *option* to simply not have cat-ed manual pages (for people with machines fast enough to just not care, or who have machines where you just don't read man pages often

Float problen running i386 inary on amd64

2007-11-02 Thread Pete French
Hi, I have a very simple program: int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { if(atof(3.2) == atof(3.200)) puts(They are equal); else puts(They are NOT equal!); return 0; }

Re: freebsd-7.0b1 xorg-7.3_1 runs only once

2007-11-02 Thread Mark Atkinson
J.R. Oldroyd wrote: Adding some additional information... On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:34:51 -0400, J.R. Oldroyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: xorg-7.3_1 runs fine, but just once. Subsequent attempts to start xorg result in: (EE) I810(0): V_BIOS address 0x0 out of range (EE) I810(0): VBE

Re: Float problen running i386 inary on amd64

2007-11-02 Thread Miguel Lopes Santos Ramos
From: Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I have a very simple program: int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { if(atof(3.2) == atof(3.200)) puts(They are equal); else puts(They are NOT equal!);