Re[2]: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-25 Thread Daniel Gerzo
Hello Pyun, Monday, February 25, 2008, 3:01:23 AM, you wrote: Perhaps the recent MFC's for re helps? see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c I have just upgraded my machine[1] to the latest 7-stable,so it is still too early to tell if re(4) is stable now.

Re: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-25 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:22:51AM +0100, Daniel Gerzo wrote: Hello Pyun, Monday, February 25, 2008, 3:01:23 AM, you wrote: Perhaps the recent MFC's for re helps? see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c I have just upgraded my machine[1] to

Inserting a character in certain column

2008-02-25 Thread Szemerédy Gábor
Hello list! I need to insert a character in certain column in all rows of the file using vi. Please help ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

Re: Inserting a character in certain column

2008-02-25 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:52:21AM -0800, Szemerédy Gábor wrote: I need to insert a character in certain column in all rows of the file using vi. Sounds more like a job for awk than vi. -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking

Re: Inserting a character in certain column

2008-02-25 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:52:21AM -0800, Szemer?dy G?bor wrote: I need to insert a character in certain column in all rows of the file using vi. Please help I don't use vi but remember it can use regexp like sed does: the following examle inserts X after 5th column (read, in 6 column): sed

Re: 6.3 nfe: strange behavior after hand

2008-02-25 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 04/02/2008 05:52 Pyun YongHyeon said the following: On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:56:17PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 01/02/2008 15:42 Andriy Gapon said the following: on 01/02/2008 14:36 Pyun YongHyeon said the following: After applying attached patch and let me know the output of

Re: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-25 Thread Pete French
Unfortunately 7-stable does not have latest fixes for re(4). For 7-stable or 7.0-RELEASE use the following files. http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/7.0R/if_re.c http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/7.0R/if_rlreg.h Ah, thats is very interesting - I have an identical motherboard to Tor,

Re: Memory Leak under FreeBSD 6.0 RELEASE

2008-02-25 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:54:45AM +0530, Arun Balakrishnan wrote: I am unable to reply to HTML mail. Please, repost it with plain text content. pgpJuLXnjWQt5.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: A simple rc.d jail patch to enable priority

2008-02-25 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Jan Srzednicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:30:05 +0100): Hello, I have written this tiny little patch to the jail rc.d script, which allows user to set jail nice value. It doesn't change any default behaviour. Can that make it to the trees? Patch attached. You need

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2008-02-25 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-02-25 14:16:37 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-02-25 14:16:37 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2008-02-25 14:16:37 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-02-25 14:17:18 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-02-25 14:17:18 -

Re: 6.3 nfe: strange behavior after hand

2008-02-25 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 25/02/2008 15:02 Andriy Gapon said the following: on 04/02/2008 05:52 Pyun YongHyeon said the following: On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:56:17PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 01/02/2008 15:42 Andriy Gapon said the following: on 01/02/2008 14:36 Pyun YongHyeon said the following: After

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2008-02-25 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-02-25 13:59:56 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-02-25 13:59:56 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2008-02-25 13:59:56 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-02-25 14:00:44 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-02-25 14:00:44 -

ntpd fails to synchronize on FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE

2008-02-25 Thread Pongthep Kulkrisada
Hi all, I upgraded to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE, I have 3 problems. I think this is the right place to ask. Please someone point me out. (1) Previously, I ran ntpd on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE with dial-up, I had no problems. Late last year I switched to ADSL and stayed behind NAT. I found that ntpd couldn't

Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2008-02-25 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:18:36AM -0500, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: ... Kernel build for LINT started on Mon Feb 25 15:10:51 UTC 2008 stage 1: configuring the kernel stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree stage 2.3: build tools stage 3.1: making

Re: ntpd fails to synchronize on FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE

2008-02-25 Thread Michael Proto
Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote: (2) My next problem after buildworld is ``man pages are not updated''. They are still FreeBSD 6.2. What happen? How to fix it? You need to delete your old catman pages. find /usr/share/man/cat* -type f -exec rm -f {} \; Please someone point me out.

Re: ntpd fails to synchronize on FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE

2008-02-25 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:07:56PM +0700, Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote: Last week I upgraded from source to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE (buildworld). I found that I can not get sync with any NTP servers both IPv4 and IPv6. The followings are my information. # cat /etc/ntp.conf server time.navy.mi.th

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2008-02-25 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-02-25 15:26:05 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-02-25 15:26:05 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2008-02-25 15:26:05 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-02-25 15:26:42 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-02-25 15:26:42 -

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2008-02-25 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-02-25 15:18:36 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-02-25 15:18:36 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2008-02-25 15:18:37 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-02-25 15:19:21 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-02-25 15:19:21 -

Re: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-25 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hi! Everybody, I *am* subscribed to the list, there is no need to CC me at all. Doing sio just clutters up my mail sorting. :-) On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:50:09 + Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, thats is very interesting - I have an identical motherboard to Tor, and am also having

7.0 RC3 and linux linprocfs

2008-02-25 Thread Paul Schmehl
Is it no longer required to mount linprocfs in 7.0 RC3? I noticed that it wasn't added to /etc/rc.conf, and that linux.ko is loaded. Just wondering if the mount is still required or not? -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas

Re: 7.0 RC3 and linux linprocfs

2008-02-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
Paul Schmehl wrote: Is it no longer required to mount linprocfs in 7.0 RC3? I noticed that it wasn't added to /etc/rc.conf, and that linux.ko is loaded. Just wondering if the mount is still required or not? linux.ko doesn't provide linprocfs. There have not been changes to the

Re: 7.0 RC3 and linux linprocfs

2008-02-25 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Monday, February 25, 2008 23:34:59 +0100 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Schmehl wrote: Is it no longer required to mount linprocfs in 7.0 RC3? I noticed that it wasn't added to /etc/rc.conf, and that linux.ko is loaded. Just wondering if the mount is still required or not?

Re: 7.0 RC3 and linux linprocfs

2008-02-25 Thread Ronald Klop
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:01:53 +0100, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Monday, February 25, 2008 23:34:59 +0100 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Schmehl wrote: Is it no longer required to mount linprocfs in 7.0 RC3? I noticed that it wasn't added to /etc/rc.conf, and

IPv6 in Jail

2008-02-25 Thread Christian
Hi, can anyone say me what the current status of running IPv6 in Jail is? Thanks, Christian ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 7.0 RC3 and usb problems

2008-02-25 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Tuesday, February 26, 2008 00:34:56 +0100 Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:01:53 +0100, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only major problem I'm having is usb just doesn't work right at all. The system doesn't sense when I insert a new device, and I

Re: packet loss with re(4)

2008-02-25 Thread Pete French
I couldn't see anyone lese in this thread whos name starts with Tor... so I guess you were adressing me. Ah, yes, sorry, not quite sure how I lost the end of your name there! I used this patch http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.patch and it worled well for me. Thanks for this,

Re: Memory Leak under FreeBSD 6.0 RELEASE

2008-02-25 Thread Arun Balakrishnan
My previous mail was this: - Wow! Thanks a lot for the reply. The patch you provided really gave some insight on the underlying problem. In our final product, the library will be loaded and used only once per instance.

Re: 7.0 RC3 and usb problems

2008-02-25 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 05:59:27PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# kldload umass kldload: can't load umass: File exists [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# kldstat Id Refs AddressSize Name 19 0xc040 906518 kernel 21 0xc0d07000 14324snd_hda.ko 32 0xc0d1c000

make KNOBS

2008-02-25 Thread Chris H.
Hello All, Maintaining a make.conf file can be a fairly daunting task within itself. But when upgrading, it becomes even more laborious. Peeking into the port Makefile to discover any /new/, or /changed/ knobs is standard fare. But it's not always obvious exactly /what/ the WITH_this, or

Re: Memory Leak under FreeBSD 6.0 RELEASE

2008-02-25 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:10:14AM +0530, Arun Balakrishnan wrote: My previous mail was this: - Wow! Thanks a lot for the reply. The patch you provided really gave some insight on the underlying problem. In our final

Re: 7.0 RC3 and usb problems

2008-02-25 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On February 25, 2008 9:47:23 PM -0800 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 05:59:27PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# kldload umass kldload: can't load umass: File exists [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# kldstat Id Refs AddressSize Name 19

Re: 7.0 RC3 and usb problems

2008-02-25 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Doesn't make much sense to me. I'm not very familiar with how the usb system works, so I'm not sure where to look to find the problem. There's no /dev/umass either. For umass devices to work, you need to have uhci (or ohci if your system uses

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2008-02-25 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-02-26 05:33:33 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-02-26 05:33:33 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2008-02-26 05:33:33 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-02-26 05:34:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-02-26 05:34:03 -

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2008-02-25 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-02-26 05:16:11 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-02-26 05:16:11 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2008-02-26 05:16:11 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-02-26 05:16:51 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-02-26 05:16:51 -

Re: make KNOBS

2008-02-25 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:55:22PM -0800, Chris H. wrote: Hello All, Maintaining a make.conf file can be a fairly daunting task within itself. But when upgrading, it becomes even more laborious. Peeking into the port Makefile to discover any /new/, or /changed/ knobs is standard fare. But

Re: make KNOBS

2008-02-25 Thread Chris H.
Hello, and thank you for your reply. Quoting Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:55:22PM -0800, Chris H. wrote: Hello All, Maintaining a make.conf file can be a fairly daunting task within itself. But when upgrading, it becomes even more laborious. Peeking into the

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2008-02-25 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-02-26 06:35:19 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-02-26 06:35:19 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2008-02-26 06:35:19 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-02-26 06:35:52 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-02-26 06:35:52 -

Re: 6.3 nfe: strange behavior after hand

2008-02-25 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 05:17:03PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 25/02/2008 15:02 Andriy Gapon said the following: on 04/02/2008 05:52 Pyun YongHyeon said the following: On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:56:17PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 01/02/2008 15:42 Andriy Gapon said the following:

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2008-02-25 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-02-26 06:41:59 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-02-26 06:41:59 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2008-02-26 06:41:59 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-02-26 06:42:25 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-02-26 06:42:25 -