We are using FreeBSD as GateWay with PF.
And the problem is that some web-sites as Gmail.com or Msn.com are
unavailable from machines with Vista or Server 2008 installed.
If use external or internal proxy (Kerio WinRoute, wich also goes through
the same FreeBSD gw) they are opening correctly.
Also
My server just literally was brought to it's knees with this message
spewing on the console:
swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 1203133, size: 4096
(blkno and size were varying)
Some searching says that this is or was a bug. Has this been fixed
yet? If so, what should I
Hi Mark Andrews!
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:07:56 +1100; Mark Andrews wrote about 'Re: INET6
required for SCTP in 7.0?':
I'm not interested in enabling support for IPv6 for now.
When I remove INET6 from the kernel configuration, I cannot compile the
kernel without disabling SCTP. With fresh
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:50:33 -0800; Xin LI wrote about 'Re: INET6 required
for SCTP in 7.0?':
I'm not interested in enabling support for IPv6 for now.
When I remove INET6 from the kernel configuration, I cannot compile the
kernel without
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:49:09AM +0200, ? ? wrote:
We are using FreeBSD as GateWay with PF.
And the problem is that some web-sites as Gmail.com or Msn.com are
unavailable from machines with Vista or Server 2008 installed.
If use external or internal proxy (Kerio WinRoute,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have FreeBSD 7.0 on my server but due to troubles with sendfile (I
don't know why, but when I run a configure script checking for that
function it shows a segmentation fault and I can't make my web server
run well), also because of some
Hi all,
I am looking for a way to detect the file system a certain file lives
and next whether this file system is mounted/accessible as writable. [1]
As stat(1) is helping me out to found out the proper device name/number
of a certain file with the command `stat -f %d /etc/motd`, but next
will
On 5 Mar 2008, at 10:06, Michael Grant wrote:
My server just literally was brought to it's knees with this message
spewing on the console:
swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 1203133, size:
4096
(blkno and size were varying)
Some searching says that this is or was a
Hello Vladislav,
2008/3/5, Владислав Недосекин [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We are using FreeBSD as GateWay with PF.
And the problem is that some web-sites as Gmail.com or Msn.com are
unavailable from machines with Vista or Server 2008 installed.
If use external or internal proxy (Kerio WinRoute,
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:07:28AM +0100, Rick van der Zwet wrote:
Which handy shell utility program will help me doing this?
I think you can use statfs(2) to look up the f_fsid, this should be
equal to the st_dev, judging from the code in kern/vfs_syscalls.c.
There doesn't appear to be a
alan bryan wrote:
I've got a new server with a 3ware 9550SXU with the
Battery. I am using FreeBSD 7.0-Release (tried both
4BSD and ULE) using AMD64 and the 3ware performance
for writes is just plain horrible. Something is
obviously wrong but I'm not sure what.
Any ideas? Anybody have one
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:07:28AM +0100, Rick van der Zwet wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking for a way to detect the file system a certain file lives
and next whether this file system is mounted/accessible as writable. [1]
As stat(1) is helping me out to found out the proper device name/number
Hi all,
My server froze up tonight after a 2 month uptime running 6.3-PRERELEASE
from Dec 28 2007.
I had to fsck /home by hand because of an inconsistency fsck couldn't
repair automatically -- something to do with an unexpected softupdate
inconsistency.
After that, I ended up with some
James López (BLuEGoD) wrote:
Hello,
I have FreeBSD 7.0 on my server but due to troubles with sendfile (I
don't know why, but when I run a configure script checking for that
function it shows a segmentation fault and I can't make my web server
run well), also because of some accidentally I
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Mark Andrews wrote:
It would be better to remove the option all together. IPv6
is no longer a protocol under development. There is no
need to make it optional any more. Having it there really
sends the wrong signal.
With all due respect, let's
Erik Stian Tefre wrote:
Results from bonnie++ with default settings on my box (7.0-RELEASE,
amd64, 480 MB system memory, BBU, write cache enabled, 7 drive raid-5,
storsave = balance, NCQ on):
Version 1.93d --Sequential Output-- --Sequential Input-
--Random-
Concurrency 1
O.K., have snipped all the above IPv4 stuff, which actually seems quite
reaosnable (though appears to foorget about STF), but this line...
In the meantime, I'd like to only enable IPv6 on IPv6 enabled networks.
...I fail to see how not wanting to enable it leads to you wanting
to remove it from
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Pete French wrote:
O.K., have snipped all the above IPv4 stuff, which actually seems quite
reaosnable (though appears to foorget about STF), but this line...
In the meantime, I'd like to only enable IPv6 on IPv6 enabled networks.
...I fail to see how not wanting to
Hi!
Well, I'm not a PF professional, and you have rather advanced setup.
So, someone with good PF experience is needed here.
2008/3/5, Владислав Недосекин [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, i understand that there is too little facts to analyze, but maybe some
one have the same problem and also i can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Dennis Melentyev wrote:
Hi!
Well, I'm not a PF professional, and you have rather advanced setup.
So, someone with good PF experience is needed here.
2008/3/5, Владислав Недосекин [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, i understand that there is too
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Mark Andrews wrote:
It would be better to remove the option all together. IPv6
is no longer a protocol under development. There is no
need to make it optional any more. Having it there really
sends the wrong signal.
With all due respect, let's
Hi Andy Dills!
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:40:20 -0500 (EST); Andy Dills wrote about 'Re: INET6
required for SCTP in 7.0?':
O.K., have snipped all the above IPv4 stuff, which actually seems quite
reaosnable (though appears to foorget about STF), but this line...
In the meantime, I'd like to
On 5 Mar 2008, at 15:32, Mark Andrews wrote:
- IPv6 provides almost no technological upgrades beyond additional
address
space. DHCP addressed the auto configuration feature, VPNs addressed
IPsec.
That extra address space really is a big advantage. It
really is so much
Ivan Voras wrote:
Erik Stian Tefre wrote:
Results from bonnie++ with default settings on my box (7.0-RELEASE,
amd64, 480 MB system memory, BBU, write cache enabled, 7 drive raid-5,
storsave = balance, NCQ on):
Version 1.93d --Sequential Output-- --Sequential Input-
--Random-
Erik Stian Tefre wrote:
It was completely idle. Changing vfs.read_max to 80 triples the
sequential read performance, see bonnie++ output below (run on the same
box, nothing changed except vfs.read_max).
It might be that 3ware is specially pessimized by FreeBSD chopping IO
into 64K blocks. But
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:00:29PM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
Makes it harder to debug, etc. Don't want to see anything IPv6 related in
command output, to let programs to bind on IPv6 addresses, etc.
Changing the Subject (but keeping the thread ID reference), since the
original topic of
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:52:23 +0100
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is reporting large variations in the rate of your time clock (see
kern_tc.c).
Aha, I see. Thanks for explaining that.
Also, you appear to be emailing from the distant future. Please
reply with stock tips :)
At 03:49 AM 3/5/2008, =?KOI8-R?B?98zBxMnTzMHXIO7FxM/TxcvJzg==?= wrote:
We are using FreeBSD as GateWay with PF.
And the problem is that some web-sites as Gmail.com or Msn.com are
unavailable from machines with Vista or Server 2008 installed.
If use external or internal proxy (Kerio WinRoute,
--On Wednesday, March 05, 2008 18:09:16 +1100 Peter Jeremy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 09:16:25PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Earlier I reported usb problems on this list. Since then I have recompiled
the kernel and world three times, each time including the latest
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:52:23 +0100
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is reporting large variations in the rate of your time clock (see
kern_tc.c).
Aha, I see. Thanks for explaining that.
Also, you appear to be emailing from the distant future.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Ruben van Staveren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5 Mar 2008, at 10:06, Michael Grant wrote:
My server just literally was brought to it's knees with this message
spewing on the console:
swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 1203133,
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:43:15PM +0900, Tod McQuillin wrote:
/home/lost+found# ls -lksh
total 24432
24432 -r 1 root operator40G Mar 5 20:12 #005
It is 40G in size but only occupies 24432k on disk, so it is a sparse file.
The file permissions and sparseness matches a
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Mark Andrews wrote:
Service providers get paid to push IP packets. They shouldn't
care which protocol version is in the header. What they
should be worried about is ensuring that they are here in
4 years time.
Sure they should. The ASICs in the
On 2008.03.04 12:05:22 +, Chris wrote:
On freebsd 6 it picks up /usr/local ssl libaries no problem and in
fact uses them without even haveing to specify the directory it auto
detects them over the base ssl. On freebsd 7 it uses the base
libraries even when telling it to search in
Michael Grant wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Ruben van Staveren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5 Mar 2008, at 10:06, Michael Grant wrote:
My server just literally was brought to it's knees with this message
spewing on the console:
swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0,
alan bryan пишет:
Hi,
I've got a new server with a 3ware 9550SXU with the
Battery. I am using FreeBSD 7.0-Release (tried both
4BSD and ULE) using AMD64 and the 3ware performance
for writes is just plain horrible. Something is
obviously wrong but I'm not sure what.
Hi!
Try to add the
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a reasonable chance that this mail will leave here
over IPv6 for some of the recipients. It will almost
certainly travel over IPv6 for at least one hop.
Mark
It did:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a reasonable chance that this mail will leave here
over IPv6 for some of the recipients. It will almost
certainly
On 2008-03-05 22:42, Peter Wemm wrote:
Oh, one more thing. If you are IPv6-enabled, you get to bypass the 10
minute greylisting delay on mx1.freebsd.org. Your email goes through
instantly instead of potentially being delayed by 10-30 minutes.
Until the spammers start using IPv6... Then we'll
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Dimitry Andric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-03-05 22:42, Peter Wemm wrote:
Oh, one more thing. If you are IPv6-enabled, you get to bypass the 10
minute greylisting delay on mx1.freebsd.org. Your email goes through
instantly instead of potentially
on 05/03/2008 14:43 Tod McQuillin said the following:
Hi all,
My server froze up tonight after a 2 month uptime running 6.3-PRERELEASE
from Dec 28 2007.
I had to fsck /home by hand because of an inconsistency fsck couldn't
repair automatically -- something to do with an unexpected
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:00:29PM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
Makes it harder to debug, etc. Don't want to see anything IPv6 related in
command output, to let programs to bind on IPv6 addresses, etc.
Changing the Subject (but keeping the thread ID reference), since the
original topic
On Mar 5, 2008, at 17:31 , Mark Andrews wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:00:29PM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
* The last I read about IPv6 in mainstream news, there were major
concerns cited over some of the security aspects of the protocol. I
also remember reading somewhere that IPv6
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 5, 2008, at 17:31 , Mark Andrews wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:00:29PM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
* The last I read about IPv6 in mainstream news, there were major
concerns cited over
On 2008-03-05 22:42, Peter Wemm wrote:
Oh, one more thing. If you are IPv6-enabled, you get to bypass the 10
minute greylisting delay on mx1.freebsd.org. Your email goes through
instantly instead of potentially being delayed by 10-30 minutes.
Until the spammers start using IPv6...
On Mar 5, 2008, at 17:31 , Mark Andrews wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:00:29PM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
* The last I read about IPv6 in mainstream news, there were major
concerns cited over some of the security aspects of the protocol. I
also remember reading somewhere that
Hi Jeremy,
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 08:01 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
* I'm not familiar with the intricacies of the protocol.
No better time (or way) to learn! Get going!
* The last I read about IPv6 in mainstream news, there were major
concerns cited over some of the security aspects of
hello list,
get Can't load kernel error while trying to install FBSD_7.0R on DELL
R900.
/
lsdev
/cd devices:/
/cd0: Device 0x0/
/disk devices:/
disk0: Bios drive C:
ls /
get bad path
and it can load kernel successly
load cd0:/boot/kernel/kernel
boot -v get progressbar | / \ and stopped
btw:
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:42:25 -0800
From: Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a reasonable chance that this
hi,
I boot FreeBSD 7.0R on R900, it stops with an error message:
can't load 'kernel'
Output from lsdev:
cd devices:
cd0: Device 0x0
disk devices:
disk0: Bios drive C:
ls cd0:/ can find files on CD.
load cd0:/boot/kernel/kernel works, but boot -v stop |\ status.
also show command does not show
hi,
I boot FreeBSD 7.0R on R900, it stops with an error message:
can't load 'kernel'
Output from lsdev:
cd devices:
cd0: Device 0x0
disk devices:
disk0: Bios drive C:
ls cd0:/ can find files on CD.
load cd0:/boot/kernel/kernel works, but boot -v stop |\ status.
also show command does not show
Huang wen hui wrote:
hi,
I boot FreeBSD 7.0R on R900, it stops with an error message:
can't load 'kernel'
It might be chipset related, I know the R860 is only like 2-4 months in
the field, so I doubt FreeBSD developers have one yet.
___
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:43:15PM +0900, Tod McQuillin wrote:
/home/lost+found# ls -lksh
total 24432
24432 -r 1 root operator40G Mar 5 20:12 #005
It is 40G in size but only occupies 24432k on disk, so it is a sparse file.
The file
Hello,
I'm having the same problem with an R900. Doesn't matter if you choose
6.2 or 6.3 either. I've also tried booting from USB Pen Drive, USB
CD-Rom Drive and booting with PXE, all give the same 'can't load kernel'
error.
I haven't been able to get it FreeBSD on it. Nor FreeNAS. DragonFly BSD
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 08:13:35AM +0100, Nicky Bulthuis wrote:
I'm having the same problem with an R900. Doesn't matter if you choose
6.2 or 6.3 either. I've also tried booting from USB Pen Drive, USB
CD-Rom Drive and booting with PXE, all give the same 'can't load kernel'
error.
Re: unable
Try downloading the ISO again.
- Original Message
From: wsk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2008 13:30:55
Subject: URGENCY help install error on DELL R900
hello list,
get Can't load kernel error while trying to install FBSD_7.0R on
56 matches
Mail list logo
