Jack Vogel wrote:
I got the new drivers in Friday afternoon for those that don't see CVS
messages.
The igb driver is for 82575 and 82576 adapters, it has multiqueue support and
MSIX, there will be more server type enhancements in that driver as I get the
time.
The em driver now will be client
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 03:49:40PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
I got the new drivers in Friday afternoon for those that don't see CVS
messages.
The igb driver is for 82575 and 82576 adapters, it has multiqueue support and
MSIX, there will be more server type enhancements in that
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 03:49:40PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
I got the new drivers in Friday afternoon for those that don't see CVS
messages.
The igb driver is for 82575 and 82576 adapters, it has multiqueue support and
MSIX, there will be more
Hi,
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:31:44 -0500
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Thursday, June 05, 2008 17:53:01 +0100 Tom Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that, especially with open source products, there is a large
emphasis on testing in your own environments, and choosing the
Hello,
i can confirm that the bug fix submitted with PR 108215 solves the reboot
problem when using mfsroot images in FreeBSD 6.3. I will test it also on
FreeBSD 7.0, but i assume that it will fix it there too.
Many users using FreeNAS reporting this reboot problem on their machines with
RAM
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 05:29:46PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Have you tried disabling speed and duplex negotiation and explicitly
stating speed and duplex like so?
ifconfig_em0=... media 1000baseTX mediaopt full-duplex
I tried it and it doesn't work.
Cisco switches have a notorious history
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...] I reacted in anger because I felt the OP was being savagely
attacked rather than being responded to with professionalism. Later
in the thread some folks got around to asking which PRs he was
referring to, but that was after attacking him for having
Patch is gzipped and can be easily gunziped after download. (and
uuencoded in webpage view)
Ah, yes, sorry about that - thought it would be obvious. I always
submit changes that way as I find that whitespace has a habit
of breaking otherwise.
It is true that patch is better in plaintext
Pete French wrote:
[...]
It is true that patch is better in plaintext diff.
How would I set about doing that without the whitespace being messed up
by email transit ? I have always found in the past that tabs end up as
spaces and then patch gets upset hwne you try to apply it.
I sent PR
On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:22 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
If you're asking why I don't turn a production environment over to
being a freebsd-unstable-testbed, I can't really answer that
question in a way you'd understand (if you were asking that question)
If you don't have an identical setup to test
On Jun 4, 2008, at 9:03 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
If this is so important to you - contribute to the project and/or hire
a FreeBSD developer.
I've got a strange problem with jails and I've been trying to hire a
freebsd developer, but I can't seem to get anyone to a) call me back.
I got
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:08:54PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote:
Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from
people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average
more stable than 6.2. I really haven't
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 12:08 -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote:
Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from
people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average
more stable than 6.2. I really haven't gotten
Have you tried disabling speed and duplex negotiation and explicitly
stating speed and duplex like so?
ifconfig_em0=... media 1000baseTX mediaopt full-duplex
Disagree with this piece of advice.
Cisco switches have a notorious history of not being friendly with
non-Cisco hardware. Forcing
Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello!
I had some troubles mounting the filesystem from:
da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: MATSHITA DMC-FX12 0100 Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device
da0: 1.000MB/s transfers
da0: 3886MB (7959552 512 byte
Greetings,
From http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/
We are working on providing Java 1.6 support for FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0.
The binaries for 7.0 will be available by June 1.
Any news? :) Where I can read more?
P.S. I understand that this is not the mailing list to ask, but I can't
find better.
On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote:
Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from
people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average
more stable than 6.2. I really haven't gotten any clear impression as
6.3 has been stable for me. I've
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:34:01AM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote:
Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from
people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average
more stable than 6.2. I really
I successfully did my first FreeBSD upgrade yesterday after looking at the
manual, and cross referencing with Googling and getting help from our network
engineer here at CWU. Before the upgrade, running df showed:
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/da0s1a
On Friday 06 June 2008 19:39:59 Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Greetings,
From http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/
We are working on providing Java 1.6 support for FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0.
The binaries for 7.0 will be available by June 1.
Any news? :) Where I can read more?
P.S. I understand that this
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:37:51AM -0700, Gavin Spomer wrote:
I successfully did my first FreeBSD upgrade yesterday after looking at the
manual, and cross referencing with Googling and getting help from our network
engineer here at CWU. Before the upgrade, running df showed:
Filesystem
Gavin Spomer wrote:
I successfully did my first FreeBSD upgrade yesterday after looking at the
manual, and cross referencing with Googling and getting help from our network
engineer here at CWU. Before the upgrade, running df showed:
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Avail Capacity
Hi,
I found when we exhaust memory, tmpfs will not be able to write
anything into it and cannot mount it.
I use ZFS and TMPFS at the same time.
Florence# cd /usr/src make buildworld /dev/null
Florence# uname -a
FreeBSD Florence.tamama.org 7.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p1 #5:
Mon May 5
Colin Percival wrote:
Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
In short, as long as you don't build a custom kernel but call it
GENERIC or
SMP, FreeBSD Update should automatically DTRT.
That is exactly my question. On 6.2-RELEASE, I sometimes used a modified
ld-elf.so.1 or a single patched module without
Dear Stefan,
I'm responding to your inquiry about the Java binaries. I just updated
our website with the current status. We have completed the certification
testing of Java 1.6 on FreeBSD 7. We are now waiting for approval from
Sun. We anticipate it to take another two weeks.
Please let me
--On June 6, 2008 11:53:49 AM +0200 Manfred Usselmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What you are saying sounds like a contradiction to me. On one side it
is just a hobby site and generates no income and on the other hand it
is a critical server with millions of hits and the box can't even go
down
--On June 6, 2008 3:08:25 PM +0200 Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...] I reacted in anger because I felt the OP was being savagely
attacked rather than being responded to with professionalism. Later
in the thread some folks got around to
Hi,
I found when we exhaust memory, tmpfs will not be able to write
anything into it and cannot mount it.
I use ZFS and TMPFS at the same time.
Florence# cd /usr/src make buildworld /dev/null
Florence# uname -a
FreeBSD Florence.tamama.org 7.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p1 #5:
Mon May 5
28 matches
Mail list logo
