Re: ACPI support?

2009-01-09 Thread Krassimir Slavchev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Thanks for your reply! Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:12:05 +0200 Krassimir Slavchev kra...@bulinfo.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, I have had a problem detecting the network card on

Re: igb on a Nehalem system, buildworld stats

2009-01-09 Thread Mars G Miro
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Mars G Miro s...@anarchy.in.the.ph wrote: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I am at Intel you know, and even we don't seem to have any systems with 82576 down in my group here. The way link works I can be about 99.9% sure

Re: possibility of a severe flaw in the logic of FreeBSD's kernel handling multiple host bridges ...

2009-01-09 Thread Manfred_Knick
Robert Noland schrieb: I'm really not sure that I am the best person to try and tackle this, Hi, Robert, thank you very much for your reply! but it does fall somewhere near me... Can you send me a pciconf -lv. You are welcome! Well, as stated in the reports, I'm prepared to help with

Re: igb on a Nehalem system, buildworld stats

2009-01-09 Thread Jack Vogel
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Mars G Miro s...@anarchy.in.the.ph wrote: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Mars G Miro s...@anarchy.in.the.ph wrote: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I am at Intel you know, and even we don't seem to have any systems

Re: igb on a Nehalem system, buildworld stats

2009-01-09 Thread Mars G Miro
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Mars G Miro s...@anarchy.in.the.ph wrote: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] If you have a back to back connection to another NIC on Port 0, no switch, does it still autoneg to 100? Connected back to back w/

Re: igb on a Nehalem system, buildworld stats

2009-01-09 Thread Mars G Miro
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] If you have a back to back connection to another NIC on Port 0, no switch, does it still autoneg to 100? Connected back to back w/ another box w/ a GigE NIC, it now does 1000baseTX: igb0:

Re: Lock enabling onboard lan (Attansic L1 GbE) on 7.1-PRERELEASE

2009-01-09 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:36:54AM +0100, Barbara wrote: [...] I've tried all the thing you've suggested with the same result. I've disabled LAN Option ROM, but it seems that I don't have the other options you mentioned. I've downloaded and burned the 7.1-RELEASE dvd and tried to

Re: kernel dump with 7.1-RELEASE

2009-01-09 Thread Daniel Bond
Hi, I'm assuming you configured a a dump-device in rc.conf, but just in case, here are the options: db ~ grep dump /etc/defaults/rc.conf [...@gonzales] dumpdev=AUTO# Device to crashdump to (device name, AUTO, or NO). dumpdir=/var/crash #

Re: NIC for VLAN

2009-01-09 Thread Daniel Bond
Hi, BCE-based cards looks good on paper, but it's firmware is of poor quality compared to BGE-based cards. The BCE-cards could sink 1.48Mpps, but it ftq drops 800Kpps, and the host sees 600Kpps. TX is ~800Kpps (according to sephe). That said, I'm using dot1q vlan trunks on both bce and bge

more marvell marvels

2009-01-09 Thread Danny Braniss
hi, the mb is asus P5K-VM, the onboard nic is, acccording to pciconf: ms...@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x81f81043 chip=0x436411ab rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)' device = '88E8056 Yukon PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller'

Re: more marvell marvels

2009-01-09 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:48:24PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: hi, the mb is asus P5K-VM, the onboard nic is, acccording to pciconf: ms...@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x81f81043 chip=0x436411ab rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology

Re: more marvell marvels

2009-01-09 Thread Danny Braniss
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:48:24PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: hi, the mb is asus P5K-VM, the onboard nic is, acccording to pciconf: ms...@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x81f81043 chip=0x436411ab rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo

Re: Big problems with 7.1 locking up :-(

2009-01-09 Thread Guy Helmer
Pete French wrote: I have a number of HP 1U servers, all of which were running 7.0 perfectly happily. I have been testing 7.1 in it's various incarnations for the last couple of months on our test server and it has performed perfectly. So the last two days I have been round upgrading all our

Re: Big problems with 7.1 locking up :-(

2009-01-09 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 09:49 AM 1/9/2009, Guy Helmer wrote: RAID controller with a pair of mirrored drives connected. Each one has both ethernets connected, bundled using lagg and LACP. I can't tell whether my situation is related, but I am seeing lockups on SMP Supermicro servers with both older (NetBurst-ish)

Re: Big problems with 7.1 locking up :-(

2009-01-09 Thread Pete French
Are you using the same disk controller as Peter ? Do both of you run with quotas on the file system ? By lockup, do you mean it doesnt respond to the network either or just anything that needs disk IO ? I dont think he can be using yhe same controller, as mine is an embedded HPO unit. they

Re: Big problems with 7.1 locking up :-(

2009-01-09 Thread Guy Helmer
Pete French wrote: Are you using the same disk controller as Peter ? Do both of you run with quotas on the file system ? By lockup, do you mean it doesnt respond to the network either or just anything that needs disk IO ? I dont think he can be using yhe same controller, as mine is an

Re: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

2009-01-09 Thread Cristiano Deana
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Brian Duke br...@box201.com wrote: #make -j4 buildworld; make -j4 buildkernel; make installkernel Use instead make -j4 buildworld make buildkernel make installkernel If any of your commands failed you were unable to know. i suppose it failed building kernel.

Broken loader on 7.1-STABLE?

2009-01-09 Thread Reuben
Good morning everyone, I was wondering if anyone else was seeing loader (v1.02) break after updating from 7.1-RELEASE to 7.1-STABLE. After performing the prescribed updating procedure (via the handbook), the system will go through the normal steps and after the boot menu will present the

Medical database Vidal

2009-01-09 Thread Harald Weis
When mounting a (cd9660) CD-ROM of the medical database Vidal in order to try an installation with wine, I've discovered that I cannot see two files (visible under Windows), setup.exe and some .ini file the full name of which I have forgotten now, while I can perfectly see the merlin-vcd-data.zip

Re: ACPI support?

2009-01-09 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:01:33 +0200 Krassimir Slavchev kra...@bulinfo.net wrote: I have found that thread. FWIW, I started a new thread[1] on freebsd-mobile, to update the status now after FreeBSD 7.1 has been released The problem may be with allocating resources by ACPI PCI-PCI bridge. There

Re: Medical database Vidal

2009-01-09 Thread Ben Morrow
In article 20090109184126.ga2...@pollux2.free.local.net you write: When mounting a (cd9660) CD-ROM of the medical database Vidal in order to try an installation with wine, I've discovered that I cannot see two files (visible under Windows), setup.exe and some .ini file the full name of which I

New snd_hda import and very low mixer volume

2009-01-09 Thread Eugene Grosbein
Hi! I've just upgraded from 7.1-PRERELEASE to 7.1-STABLE via source upgrade and divcovered that my sound stopped working. I was aware about recent HDA driver update and tried to switch hw.snd.default_unit back and forth but that did not help. Finally I've realised that's just mixer values

Re: Big problems with 7.1 locking up :-(

2009-01-09 Thread Robert Blayzor
On Jan 8, 2009, at 8:58 PM, Pete French wrote: I have a number of HP 1U servers, all of which were running 7.0 perfectly happily. I have been testing 7.1 in it's various incarnations for the last couple of months on our test server and it has performed perfectly. I noticed a problem with

Re: Big problems with 7.1 locking up :-(

2009-01-09 Thread Pete French
Since ULE is now default in 7.1 and not in 7.0, perhaps you can try that? Actually you might be on to something there one of the main differences between out test GL360 and the live ones is that the test one has less cores in it, and is under less load. So multiprocessing problems may

mini itx from via - acpi issues on 7.1R

2009-01-09 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, I'm running 7.1R (tried 8.0-CURRENT also) on a via mini itx (dmesg bellow) and if I load acpi module, I have no lan. it appears, I can set IP, even the led would blink when I ping. but no signal of bits on the other pc whatsoever. tcpdump sees nothing in both endpoints. if acpi is not

Lock enabling onboard lan (Attansic L1 GbE) on 7.1-PRERELEASE

2009-01-09 Thread Barbara
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:36:54AM +0100, Barbara wrote: [...] I've tried all the thing you've suggested with the same result. I've disabled LAN Option ROM, but it seems that I don't have the other options you mentioned. I've downloaded and burned the 7.1-RELEASE dvd and tried

Re: Big problems with 7.1 locking up :-(

2009-01-09 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 1:58 AM + 1/9/09, Pete French wrote: I have a number of HP 1U servers, all of which were running 7.0 perfectly happily. I have been testing 7.1 in it's various incarnations for the last couple of months on our test server and it has performed perfectly. So the last two days I have been

Re: Big problems with 7.1 locking up :-(

2009-01-09 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 2:39 PM -0500 1/9/09, Robert Blayzor wrote: On Jan 8, 2009, at 8:58 PM, Pete French wrote: I have a number of HP 1U servers, all of which were running 7.0 perfectly happily. I have been testing 7.1 in it's various incarnations for the last couple of months on our test server and it has

Re: mergemaster broken -- take 2

2009-01-09 Thread Mike Lempriere
Thanks everyone for the advice -- I got it working this time just fine. Works much better when one follows the directions accurately instead of by memory -- the bottom line is that this time I remembered to jot down the commands before heading downtown to the machine rack room where there's

Re: 2 (very old) bugs?

2009-01-09 Thread Doug Barton
Yannick Cadin wrote: Hi everybody, Is someone can confirm me that there are 2 bugs never fixed: - first in the stat command. Only with the -x option. If you execute stat -x on /tmp or /usr/bin/passwd parameters for example, the numeric representation of mode is wrong. The special bits are

Re: mergemaster broken -- take 2

2009-01-09 Thread Doug Barton
Mike Lempriere wrote: Thanks everyone for the advice -- I got it working this time just fine. Works much better when one follows the directions accurately instead of by memory. W00t! :) -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___

Re: mergemaster broken -- take 2

2009-01-09 Thread Ben Morrow
In article 496819f...@vintners.net you write: cvsup -g -L 2 -h cvsup10.freebsd.org | tee /root/cvsup-090108.out make buildworld | tee /root/make-buildworld-090108.out make kernel KERNCONF=GENERIC | tee /root/make-kernel-090108.out You know about script(1) I take it? It makes keeping a