The system that I built had 5 x 72GB SCA SCSI drives. Just to keep my
own sanity, I decided that I'd configure the fdisk partitioning
identically
across all of the drives. So that they all have a 1GB slice and and a
71GB
slice.
The drives all have identical capacity, so the second 71GB sli
Hi guys,
I've just got my patch for nscd backport for 6.4-p4 tested and woring fine.
You can find it here: http://valqk.com/nscd_fbsd_6/
I hope it's useful for someone.
cheers,
valqk.
Anton - Valqk написа:
> I've been searching in the mailist archives and never found this, so
> I'm reposting for
> Message: 14
> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 20:59:10 +0200
> From: Lorenzo Perone
> Subject: Re: cvsup.de.FreeBSD.org out of sync? (was: "make buildkernel
> KERNCONF=GENERIC fails")
> To: Peter Jeremy
> Cc: sta...@freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <4783d483-da04-4363-8b40-baa826f2b...@yellowspace.net>
>
Please try applying this change to your tree and let me know.
Thanks,
Kip
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=193110
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Henri Hennebert wrote:
> Kip Macy wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
>>>
>>> I will be MFC'ing
Is the idea behind leaving 1GB unused on each disk to work around the
problem of potentially being unable to replace a failed device in a
ZFS pool because a 1TB replacement you bought actually has a lower
sector count than your previous 1TB drive (since the replacement
device has to be either of ex
I built a system recently with 5 drives and ZFS. I'm not booting off
a ZFS root, though it does mount a ZFS file system once the system has
booted from a UFS file system. Rather than dedicate drives, I simply
partitioned each of the drives into a 1G partition, and another
spanning the rem
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2009 16:13:12 -0700
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> You should be able to grab the file from HEAD and run it on
>> RELENG_[67] without any problems. I will MFC it as rapidly as
>> possible.
>
> FWIW, today I upgraded a machine from 7.1-stable (dated 2009-01-11
Hey
I am not entirely sure if this question belongs here or to another
list, so feel free to direct me elsewhere :)
Anyways, I am trying to figure out the best way to configure a NAS
system I will soon get my hands on, it's a Tranquil BBS2 (
http://www.tranquilpc-shop.co.uk/acatalog/BAREBONE_SERV
Am Fri, 15 May 2009 12:05:47 -0400
schrieb John Baldwin :
> On Friday 15 May 2009 11:38:00 am Martin wrote:
> > Am Fri, 15 May 2009 11:09:20 -0400
> > schrieb John Baldwin :
> >
> > > x/i please. The /i decodes it as an instruction so I can see
> > > which registers it was attempting to derefere
As reported in the PR, the problem happens with a checkout of RELENG_7_2.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=i386/134986
I have just tested a checkout of RELENG_7 (STABLE) and in this case
make installworld succeeds.
--
fernan
___
freebsd-stabl
This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be
displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message
correctly.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take advantage of new fea
Ruben Lara wrote:
Hi all!
I just installed postfix, after build world without sendmail
If i try to send mail i get:
mail# mail aaa
Subject: a
a
.
EOT
mail# mail: /usr/sbin/sendmail: No such file or directory
Event with WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=yes in /etc/src.conf, make installworld must
create thi
13 matches
Mail list logo
