On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 12:38:34AM +0100, Ian J Hart typed:
I just had an installworld fail due to this (/rescue).
Given that many people will have chosen the default root size offered
by sysinstall a different build default would seem prudent.
In any case sysinstall needs to be
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:39:41AM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 12:38:34AM +0100, Ian J Hart typed:
I just had an installworld fail due to this (/rescue).
Given that many people will have chosen the default root size offered
by sysinstall a different
On 2009-07-06 09:42, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
#define ROOT_DEFAULT_SIZE 512
IMHO it is not. If you install a kernel with *.symbols present
twice (i.e. kernel and kernel.old contain symbol files), your
root partition will be 95% full.
I'm not sure how you arrive at this
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Dimitry Andricdimi...@andric.com wrote:
On 2009-07-06 09:42, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
#define ROOT_DEFAULT_SIZE 512
IMHO it is not. If you install a kernel with *.symbols present
twice (i.e. kernel and kernel.old contain symbol files), your
root
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:34:41AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
I'm not sure how you arrive at this number; even with -CURRENT (on i386,
with all debug symbols), I could store about 4 complete kernels on such
a filesystem:
$ du -hs /boot/kernel*
122M/boot/kernel
I get about the same on
On 2009-07-06 10:41, Dan Naumov wrote:
atom# uname -a
FreeBSD atom.localdomain 7.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p1 #0: Tue
Jun 9 18:02:21 UTC 2009
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
atom# du -hs /boot/kernel*
205M/boot/kernel
Right, so it's a lot
I'm not sure how you arrive at this number; even with -CURRENT (on i386,
with all debug symbols), I could store about 4 complete kernels on such
a filesystem:
$ du -hs /boot/kernel*
122M /boot/kernel
atom# du -hs /boot/kernel*
205M/boot/kernel
i386: 127 meg
amd64: 208 meg
Hi there Patrick,
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
PMH 7.2-System:
PMH ---
PMH makeoptions DEBUG=-g
PMH
PMH $ du -sk /boot/kernel
PMH 214778 /boot/kernel
PMH
PMH Lots of those files filling /boot/kernel.
PMH
PMH
PMH On a current server with 512 MB /, the
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:46:50AM +0200, Dimitry Andric typed:
On 2009-07-06 10:41, Dan Naumov wrote:
atom# uname -a
FreeBSD atom.localdomain 7.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p1 #0: Tue
Jun 9 18:02:21 UTC 2009
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
On 2009-07-06 11:39, Ruben de Groot wrote:
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
atom# du -hs /boot/kernel*
205M/boot/kernel
Right, so it's a lot bigger on amd64. I guess those 64-bit pointers
aren't entirely free. :)
I'm not sure where the size
Quoting Ian J Hart ianjh...@ntlworld.com:
Is this likely to be hardware? Details will follow if not.
[copied from a screen dump]
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 01
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code = supervisor write data, page not present
instruction
Hi all,
This GCC bug bites us in the Boost regression tests in a number of places.
Uh oh, I've stepped on the one-line fix bomb:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31899
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revrevision=129199
What's funny is that COPYING in the root of that branch is
hi all,
I have a problem with acpi at acer aspire 3613.
While it boot, errors appears.
Here are links for more information. I did like
is written in acpi handbook for freebsd.
I also run iasl command, but nothing changed.
Hi there
.
¿How can I upgrade my ports without having to recompile everything?
.
I allready did
# freebsd-update -r 7.2-RELEASE upgrade install
# reboot
# freebsd-update install
.
But it didn'nt upgrade the ports, so I tryed
# portupgrade -af
but it tried to compile everything
.
I also tried
#
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ishmael F.E.sulfur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there
.
¿How can I upgrade my ports without having to recompile everything?
.
I allready did
# freebsd-update -r 7.2-RELEASE upgrade install
# reboot
# freebsd-update install
.
But it didn'nt upgrade the ports, so
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Michael Protom...@jellydonut.org wrote:
You could use packages provided by the FreeBSD package repositories...
portupgrade -aP
Although those packages will contain the standard port options, which
may differ from your installed ports if you compiled them
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 11:04 -0500, Ishmael F.E. wrote:
Hi there
.
¿How can I upgrade my ports without having to recompile everything?
.
I allready did
# freebsd-update -r 7.2-RELEASE upgrade install
# reboot
# freebsd-update install
.
But it didn'nt upgrade the ports, so I tryed
#
Ralf Folkerts wrote:
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
hello!
i have a strange problem with writing data to my ufs2+su filesystem.
1. i made a 1T gpt partition on my storage server, and formatted it:
newfs -U -m 0 -o time -i 32768 /dev/da1p3a
2. i tried to move data from other servers to this
On Monday 06 July 2009 18:57:26 Tom Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 11:04 -0500, Ishmael F.E. wrote:
Hi there
.
¿How can I upgrade my ports without having to recompile everything?
.
I allready did
# freebsd-update -r 7.2-RELEASE upgrade install
# reboot
# freebsd-update install
Quoting Ian J Hart ianjh...@ntlworld.com:
Is this likely to be hardware? Details will follow if not.
[copied from a screen dump]
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 01
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code = supervisor write data, page not present
instruction
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:30:01PM +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote:
Hi all,
This GCC bug bites us in the Boost regression tests in a number of places.
Uh oh, I've stepped on the one-line fix bomb:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31899
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:45:45PM +0400, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Ralf Folkerts wrote:
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
hello!
i have a strange problem with writing data to my ufs2+su filesystem.
1. i made a 1T gpt partition on my storage server, and formatted it:
newfs -U -m 0 -o time -i 32768
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB i have a strange problem with writing data to my ufs2+su filesystem.
KB
KB 1. i made a 1T gpt partition on my storage server, and formatted it:
KB newfs -U -m 0 -o time -i 32768 /dev/da1p3a
KB
KB 2. i tried to move data from other servers to
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:45:45PM +0400, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
i have a huge amount of small files on the source systems, as you can
see they have about 20 million files and almost each of them is jpeg or
gif. afaik, there are no sparse files at all.
i still cannot
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB KB My guess that it is due to fragmentation.
KB KB As an experiment, try to create 1-byte file. Does it work on the
filesystem
KB KB in described state ?
KB
KB Doesn't UFS store one-byte (or several-bytes, like PID file) file
entirely in
KB
Hello,
I running 7.2-RELEASE i386 and i seem to have some problems with my system.
hw.realmem does not report correctly the memory.
Anybody know whatis the problem ?
lsg ~ # sysctl -a | grep hw.*mem
hw.physmem: 4214419456
hw.usermem: 3941974016
hw.realmem: 603979776
hw.firewire.fwmem.speed: 2
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:15:46AM +0400, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:45:45PM +0400, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
i have a huge amount of small files on the source systems, as you can
see they have about 20 million files and almost each of them is
I have the kernel compiled with PAE option but anyway, the system report
only 600 MB ram
lsg ~ # sysctl -a | grep hw.*mem
hw.physmem: 4214419456
hw.usermem: 3997806592
hw.realmem: 603979776
hw.firewire.fwmem.speed: 2
hw.firewire.fwmem.eui64_lo: 0
hw.firewire.fwmem.eui64_hi: 0
On 2009-07-06 22:57, Amza Marian wrote:
I have the kernel compiled with PAE option but anyway, the system report
only 600 MB ram
...
hw.realmem: 603979776
...
lsg ~ # grep memory /var/run/dmesg.boot
real memory = 4898947072 (4672 MB)
avail memory = 4117958656 (3927 MB)
This looks like a
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:39:04AM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:46:50AM +0200, Dimitry Andric typed:
Right, so it's a lot bigger on amd64. I guess those 64-bit pointers
aren't entirely free. :)
I'm not sure where the size difference comes from. I have some
Thank you sir.
Is there any solution for this issue ? (because applications does not work
correctly. - like mysql.)
(sorry for my english.)
- Original Message -
From: Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com
To: Amza Marian t...@unixteacher.org
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent:
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:15:46AM +0400, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:45:45PM +0400, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
i have a huge amount of small files on the source systems, as you can
see they have about 20 million files and
Ishmael F.E. wrote:
[...]
.
so, ¿how can I upgrade the ports?
unfortunatley I don't have time to compile my 64bit system
Have you looked at the -PP option of portupgrade?
I don't know how portmaster handles upgrades using packages only.
HTH,
Philipp
Dan Langille wrote:
On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:22:06PM +0300, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
trouble with onboard re(4) was resolved in -CURRENT and -STABLE,
but storms are not bound to ethernet only. storm may appear on
The first public test build of the FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE test cycle is now
available, 8.0-BETA1. Through the next week or so more information
about the release will be posted but here is the current target schedule
for the other 'major events':
BETA2: July 13, 2009
BETA3: July
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
portsnap update, /var/log/messages shows the following:
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom kernel: spin lock 0x80b3edc0 (sched lock
1) held by 0xff00017d8370
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
portsnap update, /var/log/messages shows the following:
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom kernel: spin lock
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Raoatti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
portsnap update, /var/log/messages shows the following:
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Raoatti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
portsnap update, /var/log/messages shows the following:
Jul 7
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:16 -, pj wrote:
Ishmael F.E. wrote:
[...]
.
so, ¿how can I upgrade the ports?
unfortunatley I don't have time to compile my 64bit system
Have you looked at the -PP option of portupgrade?
I don't know how portmaster handles upgrades using packages only.
You could
40 matches
Mail list logo
