Re: Help With Custom Disk Layout For New Install

2009-07-09 Thread Adrian Wontroba
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 06:53:31PM -0700, Drew Tomlinson wrote: ... gmirror fails silently (i.e. nothing exists in /dev/mirror). ... I can't speak for the rest of your post but have you got the following in /boot/loader.conf? geom_mirror_load=YES -- Adrian Wontroba It is far better to be

Re: 8.0-BETA1 Source Upgrade breaks NTP configuration

2009-07-09 Thread Vincent Hoffman
John Marshall wrote: Yesterday I source-upgraded a 7.2-RELEASE-p2 test i386 server to 8.0-BETA1. I have just discovered that it broke that server's NTP service. PROBLEM 1 - Existing /etc/ntp.conf overwritten Digging deeper, it looks like it may be due to the fact that this is a new

ZFS - thanks

2009-07-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, all, I just wanted to say a big big thank you to Kip and all the developers who made ZFS on FreeBSD real. And to everyone who provided helpful comments in the last couple of days. I had to delete and rebuild my zpool to switch from a 12-disk raidz2 to two 6-disk ones, but yesterday I could

Re: ZFS - thanks

2009-07-09 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Thu, July 9, 2009 08:25, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hi, all, I just wanted to say a big big thank you to Kip and all the developers who made ZFS on FreeBSD real. And to everyone who provided helpful comments in the last couple of days. I had to delete and rebuild my zpool to switch from

Re: ZFS - thanks

2009-07-09 Thread Dan Naumov
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Nenhum_de_Nosmath...@eternamente.info wrote: On Thu, July 9, 2009 08:25, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hi, all, I just wanted to say a big big thank you to Kip and all the developers who made ZFS on FreeBSD real. And to everyone who provided helpful comments in

Re: ZFS - thanks

2009-07-09 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Thu, July 9, 2009 09:25, Dan Naumov wrote: On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Nenhum_de_Nosmath...@eternamente.info wrote: On Thu, July 9, 2009 08:25, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hi, all, I just wanted to say a big big thank you to Kip and all the developers who made ZFS on FreeBSD real.

Re: ZFS - thanks

2009-07-09 Thread Dan Naumov
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Nenhum_de_Nosmath...@eternamente.info wrote: On Thu, July 9, 2009 09:25, Dan Naumov wrote: On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Nenhum_de_Nosmath...@eternamente.info wrote: On Thu, July 9, 2009 08:25, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hi, all, I just wanted to say a big

Re: ZFS - thanks

2009-07-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hello, On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:17:35AM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: So now we have this setup: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zfsONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/disk100 ONLINE 0

pw groupadd/useradd fail when the nscd cache is used for name/group resolution

2009-07-09 Thread Vlad Galu
I've stumbled upon this while installing postgres. In /etc/nsswitch.conf I had group: cache files compat and passwd: cache files compat. Once I commented them out things started working again. Before the change, this is how it looked like: -- cut here -- [r...@vgalu

Re: ZFS - thanks

2009-07-09 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
Patrick M. Hausen ha scritto: Hello, On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:17:35AM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: So now we have this setup: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zfsONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0

Re: ZFS - thanks

2009-07-09 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hello, On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 03:21:48PM +0200, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: I see a lot of people advicing to use ZFS RAID instead of HW RAID. I'm going to use HP duplicated iSCSI subsystems, which have autonomous RAID, so I'm confused about this advice. Following the ZFS RAID stream,

Re: ZFS - thanks

2009-07-09 Thread Steve Bertrand
Patrick M. Hausen wrote: So we switched to GEOM for mirroring a long time ago for one simple reason: hardware replacement. Amen. Steve smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: ZFS: zpool scrub lockup

2009-07-09 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/07/2009 23:30 Thomas Ronner said the following: Hello, I don't know whether this is the right list; maybe freebsd-fs is more appropriate. So please redirect me there if this isn't the right place. My system (i386, Athlon XP) locks hard when scrubbing a certain pool. It has been

Re: ZFS: zpool scrub lockup

2009-07-09 Thread Thomas Ronner
Hi Andriy, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 08/07/2009 23:30 Thomas Ronner said the following: Hello, I don't know whether this is the right list; maybe freebsd-fs is more appropriate. So please redirect me there if this isn't the right place. My system (i386, Athlon XP) locks hard when scrubbing a

Re: ZFS: zpool scrub lockup

2009-07-09 Thread Thomas Ronner
Thomas Ronner wrote: Hi Andriy, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 08/07/2009 23:30 Thomas Ronner said the following: Hello, I don't know whether this is the right list; maybe freebsd-fs is more appropriate. So please redirect me there if this isn't the right place. My system (i386, Athlon XP) locks

Re: ZFS: zpool scrub lockup

2009-07-09 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 09/07/2009 20:21 Thomas Ronner said the following: I put the following in my kernel config: # debugging options KDB options DDB options GDB options BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER options INVARIANTS options INVARIANT_SUPPORT options WITNESS

Re: ZFS: zpool scrub lockup

2009-07-09 Thread Thomas Ronner
Andriy Gapon wrote: For watchdog to fire it first needs to be enabled, e.g. by starting watchdogd. Try to run /etc/rd.d/watchdogd onestart before zfs start and then wait for about 16 seconds (default timeout). I tried this. When only running 'watchdog' (without starting the daemon) it enters

Re: FreeBSD 8.0-BETA1 Available

2009-07-09 Thread Andreas Tobler
Ken Smith wrote: On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 22:01 +0200, Andreas Tobler wrote: I was successful in installing the image, although, a few packages did not install. I did a kern developer package. I guess the packages are missing on the .img? Correct, no packages with BETA1. It's probably the

process stuck in umtxn

2009-07-09 Thread Mikhail T.
Hello! I noticed, that my build of KDE4 ports got suspiciously quiet... Pressing Ctrl-T shows: load: 0.01 cmd: automoc4 78507 [umtxn] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 3552k According to gdb, the process' stack is: #0 0x000800d9620a in __error () from /lib/libthr.so.3 #1 0x000800d95f0c in

pppoe on a VLAN interface issues (RELENG_7)

2009-07-09 Thread Mike Tancsa
I wanted to share a DSL modem that is in bridge mode between two FreeBSD boxes that make use of many VLANs on a pair of em interfaces. In other words, I cant dedicate a physical interface to just using the DSL. Normally, when creating vlans, I like to create them as so /sbin/ifconfig

Re: process stuck in umtxn

2009-07-09 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 09), Mikhail T. said: I noticed, that my build of KDE4 ports got suspiciously quiet... Pressing Ctrl-T shows: load: 0.01 cmd: automoc4 78507 [umtxn] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 3552k According to gdb, the process' stack is: #0 0x000800d9620a in __error () from

Re: ZFS - thanks

2009-07-09 Thread Andrew Snow
Patrick M. Hausen wrote: You cannot escape the poor write performance of RAID 5 and comparable setups with or without hardware. No matter how much you cache, one time a block must be written to disk. ZFS RAIDZ works differently: It is based on variable-sized blocks written to the disks based

smbfs panic when lost connection or unmount --force

2009-07-09 Thread Oliver Pinter
Hi all! It is a kernel panic, when force unmount the smbfs volume or lost the connection with the samba server. -- Thes OS is: kern.ostype: FreeBSD kern.osrelease: 7.2-STABLE kern.osrevision: 199506 kern.version: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #4: Sat Jun 27 21:44:32 CEST 2009

Re: smbfs panic when lost connection or unmount --force

2009-07-09 Thread Attilio Rao
2009/7/10 Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.com: Hi all! It is a kernel panic, when force unmount the smbfs volume or lost the connection with the samba server. -- Thes OS is: kern.ostype: FreeBSD kern.osrelease: 7.2-STABLE kern.osrevision: 199506 kern.version: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #4:

ahmad syarifudin added you as a friend on Boxbe

2009-07-09 Thread ahmad syarifudin
Boxbe | Contact Request I use Boxbe to manage my inbox. I think Boxbe can help you, too! Here's the link: [1]https://www.boxbe.com/register?tc=211772005_1203235125 -ahmad Please do not reply directly to this email. This message was sent at the request of