On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 16:30 -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi, Sean,
>
> On 2010/06/15 15:10, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?limit_changes=0&view=revision&revision=208361
> >
> > I'm not sure what's up with this update, but
On 06/15/10 22:53, Daniel Braniss wrote:
A similar 'security feature' was introduced sometime ago, wich 'silently'
broke firefox instalation , it refused to allow symlinks in destination
directory, of course the error was ignored by 'make install' so it took
some time later to find out that nothi
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2010/06/15 17:05, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 17:10 -0500, Sean Bruno wrote:
> >> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?limit_changes=0&view=revision&revision=208361
> >>
> >> I'm not sure what's up with this update, but it ho
On Jun 15, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2010/06/15 17:05, Sean Bruno wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 17:10 -0500, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?limit_changes=0&view=revision&revision=208361
>>>
>>> I'm not su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010/06/15 17:05, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 17:10 -0500, Sean Bruno wrote:
>> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?limit_changes=0&view=revision&revision=208361
>>
>> I'm not sure what's up with this update, but it hosed up the defau
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 17:10 -0500, Sean Bruno wrote:
> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?limit_changes=0&view=revision&revision=208361
>
> I'm not sure what's up with this update, but it hosed up the default
> behavior of cpio.
>
> It appears now that -o won't do the same things that it used to:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 03:50:39AM +0400, Artem Kim wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010 03:21:09 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
> > Hmm, why you need link0 flag? The link0 flag is used to force the
> > interface MASTER. Normally this configuration is automatically
> > done during auto-negotiation such tha
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 03:21:09 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> Hmm, why you need link0 flag? The link0 flag is used to force the
> interface MASTER. Normally this configuration is automatically
> done during auto-negotiation such that one is configured as MASTER
> and the other is configured as SLAVE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi, Sean,
On 2010/06/15 15:10, Sean Bruno wrote:
> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?limit_changes=0&view=revision&revision=208361
>
> I'm not sure what's up with this update, but it hosed up the default
> behavior of cpio.
[...]
> We've had to re
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 02:57:01AM +0400, Artem Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 June 2010 21:50:03 you wrote:
> . . .
> > > nas2 # netstat-ndI bge1
> > > Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Idrop Opkts Oerrs Coll Drop
> > > bge1 1500 00:1 b: 78: a3: 3c: 01 418543876 1972918 0 446063237 0
> > > 0 0 bge
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 21:50:03 you wrote:
. . .
> > nas2 # netstat-ndI bge1
> > Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Idrop Opkts Oerrs Coll Drop
> > bge1 1500 00:1 b: 78: a3: 3c: 01 418543876 1972918 0 446063237 0
> > 0 0 bge1 1500 XX.XX.6.12 XX.XX.6.133 890,306 - - 1,076,833 - - -
>
> Ok, I se
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?limit_changes=0&view=revision&revision=208361
I'm not sure what's up with this update, but it hosed up the default
behavior of cpio.
It appears now that -o won't do the same things that it used to:
+ cd /
+ find -x .
+ egrep -v '^\.(/snap|/usr/sup|/boot/kernel/
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 07:09:27AM +0400, Artem Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:03:43 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 07:34:11PM +0400, Artem Kim wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have two routers (HP DL140G3):
> > >
> > > NAS3 FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE # 0: Thu Jun 3 04:13:07 M
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 14:06 -0700, I wrote:
> Thanks for your quick response. I don't need much in terms of
> long-term data reliability on these machines (thus the RAID 0).
> However, if MatrixRAID is unreliably even without further external
> events (like disk problems/changes), I'll turn it
on 15/06/2010 08:34 Masoom Shaikh said the following:
> Hello List,
>
> In continuation to my earlier mail, I am now convinced(nearly) that
> the freezes faced by me are "RAM parity error" indeed.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org/msg70730.html
>
> when using internet via
15 matches
Mail list logo