[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2010-08-22 04:42:19 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-08-22 04:42:19 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-08-22 04:42:19 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-08-22 04:43:06 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-08-22 04:43:06 - /usr/b

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2010-08-22 04:37:21 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-08-22 04:37:21 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-08-22 04:37:21 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-08-22 04:38:09 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-08-22 04:38:09 - /usr/b

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2010-08-22 03:13:44 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-08-22 03:13:44 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-08-22 03:13:44 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-08-22 03:14:41 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-08-22 03:14:41 - /usr

Re: 8.1R ZFS almost locking up system

In the last episode (Aug 21), Tim Bishop said: > I've had a problem on a FreeBSD 8.1R system for a few weeks. It seems > that ZFS gets in to an almost unresponsive state. Last time it did it > (two weeks ago) I couldn't even log in, although the system was up, this > time I could manage a reboot bu

8.1R ZFS almost locking up system

I've had a problem on a FreeBSD 8.1R system for a few weeks. It seems that ZFS gets in to an almost unresponsive state. Last time it did it (two weeks ago) I couldn't even log in, although the system was up, this time I could manage a reboot but couldn't stop any applications (they were likely hang

Re: i5 boards and ichwd

Speaking of ichwd, has anyone gotten ichwd to work with Intel's S3420GPC boards? http://www.intel.com/p/en_US/support/highlights/server/s3420gp is...@pci0:0:31:0: class=0x060100 card=0x34ec8086 chip=0x3b148086 rev=0x05

Re: ichwd causes freeze instead of reset

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:09:04PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > Am 21.08.2010 um 23:02 schrieb Andriy Gapon: > > > on 21/08/2010 23:33 Stefan Bethke said the following: > >> Hi, > >> > >> somewhat foolishly, I activated watchdogd and ichwd on a remote box, and > >> while testing it (by suspendin

Re: ichwd causes freeze instead of reset

Am 21.08.2010 um 23:24 schrieb Mike Tancsa: > At 05:09 PM 8/21/2010, Stefan Bethke wrote: > >> I guess what I'm looking for is some confirmation that ichwd is working >> properly on this particular hardware: Asus Pundit P4 P5G41 with a G41 >> chipset. >> > > Dont know about that particular MB

Re: ichwd causes freeze instead of reset

At 05:09 PM 8/21/2010, Stefan Bethke wrote: I guess what I'm looking for is some confirmation that ichwd is working properly on this particular hardware: Asus Pundit P4 P5G41 with a G41 chipset. Dont know about that particular MB implementation, but I have a number of various ICH7 based bo

Re: ichwd causes freeze instead of reset

Am 21.08.2010 um 23:02 schrieb Andriy Gapon: > on 21/08/2010 23:33 Stefan Bethke said the following: >> Hi, >> >> somewhat foolishly, I activated watchdogd and ichwd on a remote box, and >> while testing it (by suspending watchdogd), apparently the watchdog >> triggered. But instead of resetting

Re: ichwd causes freeze instead of reset

on 21/08/2010 23:33 Stefan Bethke said the following: > Hi, > > somewhat foolishly, I activated watchdogd and ichwd on a remote box, and > while testing it (by suspending watchdogd), apparently the watchdog > triggered. But instead of resetting, the machine does not react anymore on > the serial

ichwd causes freeze instead of reset

Hi, somewhat foolishly, I activated watchdogd and ichwd on a remote box, and while testing it (by suspending watchdogd), apparently the watchdog triggered. But instead of resetting, the machine does not react anymore on the serial console. I will have to wait until Monday to get physical acce

Re: daily run output 800.scrub-zfs fixups

On 08/21/2010 15:50, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:17:08 -0400 jhell wrote: > >> >> Hi Alexander, >> >> Attached is a fix for one problem and one slight overlook for >> 800.scrub-zfs. >> >> The first & second change was probably just an oversight but none the >> less they bo

Re: daily run output 800.scrub-zfs fixups

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:17:08 -0400 jhell wrote: > > Hi Alexander, > > Attached is a fix for one problem and one slight overlook for > 800.scrub-zfs. > > The first & second change was probably just an oversight but none the > less they both give a false impression of actions taken. > > Change1

Re: NFS stalling on 8.1-STABLE

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:54:04AM -0700, Mark Morley wrote: > On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 23:35:50 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick > wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:35:49AM -0700, Mark Morley wrote: > >> I have five front end web servers that all mount their content from > >> the same server via NFS. If I s