Re: Crashes on X7SPE-HF with em

2010-08-28 Thread Philipp Wuensche
Philipp Wuensche wrote: It just now started running the kernel without IPSEC and ALTQ. Here we go again, this time it crashed with IPSEC and ALTQ disabled, crashdump looks different this time though. GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software,

Re: 8.1-PRERELEASE: CPU packages not detected correctly

2010-08-28 Thread Andriy Gapon
Oops, the patch had a small mistake. I've put it here now, just in case I'll want to fix/cleanup anything else: http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/intel-cpu-topo.diff on 28/08/2010 23:22 Andriy Gapon said the following: So, here is my take on the problem. The attached patch is against sources in

Re: 8.1-PRERELEASE: CPU packages not detected correctly

2010-08-28 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 28/08/2010 01:02 Andriy Gapon said the following: BTW, it may be not that hard. It seems that 0x4 topology building involves knowing the masks and we already have that data (just interpreted differently), and APIC IDs of the CPUs and it seems that we also have that. We don't need to bind

ACPI Warning: Optional field Pm2ControlBlock has zero address

2010-08-28 Thread Dan Langille
This this something to be concerned about: ACPI Warning: Optional field Pm2ControlBlock has zero address or length: 0x/0x1 (20100331/tbfadt-655) -- Dan Langille - http://langille.org/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: ACPI Warning: Optional field Pm2ControlBlock has zero address

2010-08-28 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 04:35:58PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: This this something to be concerned about: ACPI Warning: Optional field Pm2ControlBlock has zero address or length: 0x/0x1 (20100331/tbfadt-655) CC'ing freebsd-acpi. OS version is unknown. -- | Jeremy Chadwick

Re: ACPI Warning: Optional field Pm2ControlBlock has zero address

2010-08-28 Thread Dan Langille
On 8/28/2010 8:30 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 04:35:58PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: This this something to be concerned about: ACPI Warning: Optional field Pm2ControlBlock has zero address or length: 0x/0x1 (20100331/tbfadt-655) CC'ing freebsd-acpi. OS

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

2010-08-28 Thread Rick C. Petty
Hi. I'm still having problems with NFSv4 being very laggy on one client. When the NFSv4 server is at 50% idle CPU and the disks are 1% busy, I am getting horrible throughput on an idle client. Using dd(1) with 1 MB block size, when I try to read a 100 MB file from the client, I'm getting