On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote:
Hello Pyun,
On this new server, I cannot get more than ~280kByte/s up/downstream out of
re(4) without any tweaking.
re0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
On Sat, 06.11.2010 at 23:19:33 -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote:
Hello Pyun,
On this new server, I cannot get more than ~280kByte/s up/downstream out of
re(4) without any tweaking.
re0:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:24:21PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Sat, 06.11.2010 at 23:19:33 -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote:
Hello Pyun,
On this new server, I cannot get more than ~280kByte/s up/downstream out
Just for the archives, the version of
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2010-November/022058.htmlhttp://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2010-November/022058.html
fixes this particular problem on this particular version of the em
nic for me on RELENG_8. The motherboard
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:24:21PM +0100, Ulrich Sp??rlein wrote:
On Sat, 06.11.2010 at 23:19:33 -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ulrich Sp??rlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote:
Hello Pyun,
On this new server, I cannot get more than ~280kByte/s up/downstream out
Just to report back on this - I just tried the patches from last week,
which fixed the sending of the keepalives in the different
thread, but my original issue (the sychronisation speed) remains
I'm afraid - so much for the theory that the corruption was causing
the speed decrease. It's obviously
