Re: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting

2011-02-01 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Freebsd-stable. You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 10:24:16: And all connections are reset. Before latest commits to driver this system paniced in swi_clock. Now it works without panics, but seems, that problem is not fixed completely. I forgot to give one last pice of information:

Re: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting

2011-02-01 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 01.02.2011 13:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Freebsd-stable. You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 10:24:16: And all connections are reset. Before latest commits to driver this system paniced in swi_clock. Now it works without panics, but seems, that problem is not fixed completely. I

harmless zfs warnings?

2011-02-01 Thread Daniel Braniss
hi, I have one disk, labeled r0 (/dev/mfid0), which i gpart'ed so: =34 1952448445 mfid0 GPT (931G) 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64K) 162 4194304 2 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) 4194466 100663296 3 freebsd-swap (48G) 104857762 1847590717

Re: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting

2011-02-01 Thread Jack Vogel
I don't test POLLING, sounds like its broken, I don't understand why you think you need you need it? This hardware supports MSI why not use it? Jack 2011/1/31 Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org Hello, Freebsd-stable. You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 10:24:16: And all connections are reset.

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-02-01 Thread Attila Nagy
On 01/30/11 12:09, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:27:38PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: On 19 January 2011 16:02, Kostik Belousovkostik...@gmail.com wrote: http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/tmpfs.h.patch I don't think this is a complete solution but it's a start. If you

Re: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting

2011-02-01 Thread Damien Fleuriot
We have tried POLLING here on Intel cards attached to the igb driver (see my post entitled High interrupt rate on a PF box + performance from 27/01/2011. This broke carp *badly* and we switched back to interrupts. You say a single thread eats up a full CPU core, can you post a top to show the

Is /etc/rc.conf scriptable?

2011-02-01 Thread Yue Wu
Hi list, I'm trying to do something to make rc.conf can act conditionally What I want is: 1. List the wireless access points, grep if there is one which bssid is 'bb:bb:bb:bb:bb:bb', if there is, then set ifconfig_wlan0 to the value: inet 192.168.1.111 netmask 255.255.255.0 WPA 2. check

Re: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting

2011-02-01 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Eugene Jack. You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 11:23:23: Eugene wrote: You could give a try to netisr parallelism of RELENG_8 instead of POLLING (and tune interrupt throttling) if your box does not have lots of dynamic interfaces like when using mpd. Jack wrote: I don't test POLLING,

Re: Is /etc/rc.conf scriptable?

2011-02-01 Thread Paul Schenkeveld
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:35:06PM +0800, Yue Wu wrote: Hi list, I'm trying to do something to make rc.conf can act conditionally What I want is: 1. List the wireless access points, grep if there is one which bssid is 'bb:bb:bb:bb:bb:bb', if there is, then set ifconfig_wlan0 to the

Re: Is /etc/rc.conf scriptable?

2011-02-01 Thread Ivan Voras
On 01/02/2011 13:35, Yue Wu wrote: Hi list, I'm trying to do something to make rc.conf can act conditionally Technically, yes it can be done, but you shouldn't. It is in essence a shell script as it is sourced by other shell scripts but that's only because that approach is easiest to

Re: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting

2011-02-01 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 01.02.2011 18:38, Lev Serebryakov wrote: = INTR - ISR.DIRECT=1 Real speed (accroding to Windows'7 report) ~101MiB/s. I've re-created file to flush caches on both sides between trys. netisr queues help to deal with lots of incoming traffic. If you bother about outgoing

Re: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting

2011-02-01 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Eugene. You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 16:52:57: = INTR - ISR.DIRECT=1 Real speed (accroding to Windows'7 report) ~101MiB/s. I've re-created file to flush caches on both sides between trys. netisr queues help to deal with lots of incoming traffic. If you bother about

Re: Is /etc/rc.conf scriptable?

2011-02-01 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Yue Wu vano...@gmail.com (from Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:35:06 +0800): 2. check if bitlbee has been installed, if so, then let bitlbee service start. So I tried with following settings in rc.conf, but all of them failed, i.e., the networking can't be connected and bitlbee service doesn't

Re: Is /etc/rc.conf scriptable?

2011-02-01 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 2/1/11 1:35 PM, Yue Wu wrote: Hi list, I'm trying to do something to make rc.conf can act conditionally What I want is: 1. List the wireless access points, grep if there is one which bssid is 'bb:bb:bb:bb:bb:bb', if there is, then set ifconfig_wlan0 to the value: inet

Re: nfsd hung on ufs vnode lock

2011-02-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, January 31, 2011 5:29:24 pm John Hickey wrote: On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:00:29PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: (kgdb) vprint vp 0xd417633c: tag none, type VBAD usecount 0, writecount 0, refcount 1 mountedhere 0x0 flags (VI_DOOMED) lock type ufs: UNLOCKED with 1 pending

ZFS hanging with simultaneous zfs recv and zfs umount -f

2011-02-01 Thread Luke Marsden
Hi FreeBSD-{stable,current,fs}, I've reliably been able to cause the ZFS subsystem to hang under FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE under the following conditions: Another server is sending the server an incremental snapshot stream which is in the process of being received with: zfs send -I $OLD

ZFS hanging with simultaneous zfs recv and zfs umount -f

2011-02-01 Thread Luke Marsden
Hi FreeBSD-{stable,current,fs}, I've reliably been able to cause the ZFS subsystem to hang under FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE under the following conditions: Another server is sending the server an incremental snapshot stream which is in the process of being received with: zfs send -I $OLD

em0 lock up / hangs (WAS: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting)

2011-02-01 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Eugene. You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 15:38:33: Eugene wrote: You could give a try to netisr parallelism of RELENG_8 instead of POLLING (and tune interrupt throttling) if your box does not have lots of dynamic interfaces like when using mpd. Jack wrote: I don't test POLLING, sounds

Re: 8-STABLE/amd64 semi-regular crash with kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled in process 12 (swi4: clock)

2011-02-01 Thread Adam McDougall
On 01/20/11 03:05, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Eugene. You wrote 19 января 2011 г., 12:50:25: Yes, I've missed it's PRERELEASE already. Backtrace points to the problem in em_local_timer() fixed in CURRENT 7 days ago, take a look:

Re: 8-STABLE/amd64 semi-regular crash with kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled in process 12 (swi4: clock)

2011-02-01 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Adam. You wrote 1 февраля 2011 г., 21:59:31: Did it help the problem? I think I saw a related panic today so I'm going to try updating past the time this was MFC'ed to 8 which I think was Sat Jan 22 01:34:08 2011 UTC (10 days, 17 hours ago). Thanks. It doesn't crash anymore, but my

Issues with ar0(Host Raid) adaptec after upgrade to 8.2

2011-02-01 Thread Colin Legendre
Hey All, I'm having an odd issue, and the only thing I can imagine is that there has been a major change between 8.1 and 8.2. Using the 8.1 kernel everything is dandy. But when I try to use a newly compiled kernel from 8.2(GENERIC) I have no luck. Root will not mount. Here are relevant

Re: KERN - mfi driver for Dell raid h200 on r210 servers

2011-02-01 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Damien Fleuriot: As requested, find below the output of a verbose boot. Thanks to Damien and his machine, we have seen that in RAID mode, the mps driver, backported from current (backported as in, drop the mps directory in the 8.2 tree) is not able to see the RAID array.

Re: Issues with ar0(Host Raid) adaptec after upgrade to 8.2

2011-02-01 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:34:18PM -0500, Colin Legendre wrote: Hey All, I'm having an odd issue, and the only thing I can imagine is that there has been a major change between 8.1 and 8.2. Using the 8.1 kernel everything is dandy. But when I try to use a newly compiled kernel from

Re: Issues with ar0(Host Raid) adaptec after upgrade to 8.2

2011-02-01 Thread Colin Legendre
On 2/1/2011 6:22 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:34:18PM -0500, Colin Legendre wrote: Hey All, I'm having an odd issue, and the only thing I can imagine is that there has been a major change between 8.1 and 8.2. Using the 8.1 kernel everything is dandy. But when I try

panic in tmpfs_valloc_vp() in 8-STABLE r217160

2011-02-01 Thread Glen Barber
Hi, I know tmpfs(5) is experimental on FreeBSD, but it seems to be enabled for ports-mgmt/tinderbox-devel, which probably not too coincidentally had just started a build before the machine panic'd. uname: FreeBSD orion 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #8 r217160: Sat Jan 8 14:17:44 EST

Re: panic in tmpfs_valloc_vp() in 8-STABLE r217160

2011-02-01 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:18:28PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: Hi, I know tmpfs(5) is experimental on FreeBSD, but it seems to be enabled for ports-mgmt/tinderbox-devel, which probably not too coincidentally had just started a build before the machine panic'd. uname: FreeBSD orion

Re: panic in tmpfs_valloc_vp() in 8-STABLE r217160

2011-02-01 Thread Glen Barber
On 2/1/11 7:56 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Any advice on how I can help provide further information would be appreciated. At this time do not mix tmpfs with ZFS: http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/stable/2011-01/msg00344.html Thanks for the info. Cheers, -- Glen Barber