On Sun Dec 18 11, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:51:47PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 02:37:52 +, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 13/12/2011 09:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
I observe ULE interactivity slowness even on single core machine
(Pentium
4) in
On Sun Dec 18 11, Alexander Best wrote:
On Sun Dec 18 11, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:51:47PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 02:37:52 +, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 13/12/2011 09:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
I observe ULE interactivity slowness even on
On 12/18/11 03:37, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 13/12/2011 09:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
I observe ULE interactivity slowness even on single core machine
(Pentium 4) in very visible places, like 'ps ax' output stucks in the
middle by ~1 second. When I switch back to SHED_4BSD, all slowness is
gone.
On 17.12.2011 22:47, Randy Bush wrote:
# ATA/SCSI peripherals
devicescbus # SCSI bus (required for ATA/SCSI)
#device ch # SCSI media changers
#device da # Direct Access (disks)
#device sa
Hi,
What Attilllo and others need are KTR traces in the most stripped down
example of interactive-busting workload you can find.
Eg: if you're doing 32 concurrent buildworlds and trying to test
interactivity - fine, but that's going to result in a lot of KTR
stuff.
If you can reproduce it using
# ATA/SCSI peripherals
device scbus # SCSI bus (required for ATA/SCSI)
#device ch # SCSI media changers
#device da # Direct Access (disks)
#device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc)
#device
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 04:43:13PM -0500, Randy Bush wrote:
# ATA/SCSI peripherals
device scbus # SCSI bus (required for ATA/SCSI)
#devicech # SCSI media changers
#deviceda # Direct Access (disks)
#device
With the introduction of FreeBSD 9.x, all ATA devices now use a
translation layer (ATA-CAM), and this is especially so with anything
SATA. I imagine this needs to be documented (in red, bold, etc.) in the
official 9.0-RELEASE documentation, because it's probably going to trip
up others.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 04:43:13PM -0500, Randy Bush wrote:
# ATA/SCSI peripherals
device scbus # SCSI bus (required for ATA/SCSI)
#device ch # SCSI media changers
I would like to see better documentation on labeling file systems and
disks, though. It can be rather confusing between gpart labels,
glabels, and such.
been making me crazy on some systems. and i have one hpt where i used
labels but the controller is s smart it moves dev nums under me.
I have a question. Perhaps soeone can point me to a solution.
I have a server running FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE with one network card running ezjail
My network has two gateways.
The host is running as 10.10.10.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 with gateway 10.10.10.1
The jail must be running 192.168.178.10
Thanks.
My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs = the
benchmark to ensure expected behaviour.
The installation, execut= ion and comparison against the benchmarks in
the article is fairly simple.= br
Note that some tuning may not be relevant or recommended
The trouble is that there's lots of anecdotal evidence, but noone's
really gone digging deep into _their_ example of why it's broken. The
developers who know this stuff don't see anything wrong. That hints to
me it may be something a little more creepy - as an example, the
interplay between
I think you should add device da or device ada option to have some
disks available.
indeed. confirmed.
randy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
14 matches
Mail list logo
