Monday, December 31, 2012, 12:40:47 PM, you wrote:
That's what I was afraid I would hear. Recently, I was informed by SF.NET,
that my account would be upgraded, and all the projects I have, which all
use CVS, would be upgraded to SVN (which renders them useless). When I
asked why, they told
Hello Zoran,
Monday, December 31, 2012, 8:33:43 AM, you wrote:
I'm quite happy to see 9.1 out and want to ask polite and
benevolent question:
regarding times on the site, are iso and img files the same
as 2 weeks ago? To remind noble readers. I installed on my
computers what was release at
On 01/01/2013 07:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:05:11AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 01/01/2013 01:49, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote:
On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote:
I have a Tinderbox that I just
On 01/01/2013 07:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:05:11AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 01/01/2013 01:49, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote:
On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote:
I have a Tinderbox that I just
On 01/01/2013 07:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:05:11AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 01/01/2013 01:49, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote:
On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote:
I have a Tinderbox that I just
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski tak...@takeda.tk wrote:
That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
decide to switch to git, since despite its benefits that is a huge
change, and would definitely be hard for people to adjust.
Just In Case:
FreeBSD has no
On 12/31/12, Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs wrote:
I'm quite happy to see 9.1 out and want to ask polite and
benevolent question:
regarding times on the site, are iso and img files the same
as 2 weeks ago? To remind noble readers. I installed on my
computers what was release at that time and got
On 01-01-13 15:55, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski tak...@takeda.tk wrote:
That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
decide to switch to git, since despite its benefits that is a huge
change, and would definitely be hard for people to
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:39:44PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 01/01/2013 07:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:05:11AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 01/01/2013 01:49, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote:
On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, Dominic
Greetings
I will be upgrading my main desktop system from 8-stable to 9-stable
this week and am quite confused with regards to Clang vs GCC. I have
complete backups and will be doing a complete re-install.
I have seen several different examples of what to put
into /etc/src.conf and
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 15:44:16 +0100, Robert travelin...@cox.net wrote:
Greetings
I will be upgrading my main desktop system from 8-stable to 9-stable
this week and am quite confused with regards to Clang vs GCC. I have
complete backups and will be doing a complete re-install.
I have seen
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 06:44:16AM -0800, Robert wrote:
...
I will be upgrading my main desktop system from 8-stable to 9-stable
this week and am quite confused with regards to Clang vs GCC. I have
complete backups and will be doing a complete re-install.
I have seen several different
On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski tak...@takeda.tk wrote:
That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
decide to switch to git, since despite its benefits that is a huge
change, and would definitely be hard for people to
On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski tak...@takeda.tk wrote:
That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
decide to switch to git, since despite its benefits that
On 1/1/13 12:19 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski tak...@takeda.tk wrote:
That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
decide to switch to
Hello Alfred,
Tuesday, January 1, 2013, 12:17:17 PM, you wrote:
Just In Case:
FreeBSD has no plans to switch to get in either the short or long
term. We will however offer git repositories and first-class cousins
via git.freebsd.org and github.
Are you sure? Most of the diffs developers
On 1/1/13 12:51 PM, Derek Kulinski wrote:
Hello Alfred,
Tuesday, January 1, 2013, 12:17:17 PM, you wrote:
Just In Case:
FreeBSD has no plans to switch to get in either the short or long
term. We will however offer git repositories and first-class cousins
via git.freebsd.org and github.
Hello Kevin,
Monday, December 31, 2012, 2:39:15 PM, you wrote:
All of that said, I still use CVS for on thing, RANCiD. (It is a
system for managing router and switch configurations).It can use
either CVS or SVN, but I keep the data is CVS as there is considerable
advantage to being able to
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
git-svn is somewhat problematic:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/GitWorkflow - Using git-svn (FreeBSD committers
only) -
Things to keep in mind:
*
Never git merge branches, unless you know what you're doing.
*
Accordingly, I configured /etc/src.conf to read:
CC=clang
CXX=clang++
CPP=clang-cpp
WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=yes
This has worked for me as well, but I am not familiar with
'WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS'. Why did you add that and what does it do?
Thanks
Mark
___
Am 31.12.2012 21:40, schrieb Chris H:
IM(NS)HO; SVN is an inferior RCS created so Windows users wouldn't feel
left out.
No, and it has nothing to do with Windows. CVS does work on Windows.
SVN 1.5 or newer is CVS done right, if you want the server-client split
model, and can waive the
Am 01/01/13 23:46, schrieb Mark van Dijk:
Accordingly, I configured /etc/src.conf to read:
CC=clang
CXX=clang++
CPP=clang-cpp
WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=yes
This has worked for me as well, but I am not familiar with
'WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS'. Why did you add that and what does it do?
Thanks
Mark
(..) I am not familiar with
'WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS'. Why did you add that and what does it do?
WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS = yes makes the new libc++ being built. It can be used
with LLVM/CLANG by setting explicitely
CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++ -std=c++11
in /etc/src.conf for being used
Hello,
I have been in a trouble about my NFS server for a long time. The
symptom is that it stops working in one or two weeks after a boot. I
could not track down the cause yet, but it is reproducible and only
occurred under a very high I/O load.
It did not panic, just stopped
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Matthias Andree mand...@freebsd.org wrote:
Am 31.12.2012 21:40, schrieb Chris H:
IM(NS)HO; SVN is an inferior RCS created so Windows users wouldn't feel
left out.
No, and it has nothing to do with Windows. CVS does work on Windows.
SVN 1.5 or newer is CVS
Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have been in a trouble about my NFS server for a long time.
The symptom is that it stops working in one or two weeks after
a boot ... It did not panic, just stopped working---while it
responded to ping, userland programs seemed not working ...
On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski tak...@takeda.tk wrote:
That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
decide to switch to git, since despite its benefits that
Hi,
Thank God! I'd hate to think that after unwinding years accumulated
CVS process, to rewind it for SVN, only to have to do it again for
GIT, just seems a bit masochistic.
do not worry. It will come.
Seriously, I do not understand many changes especially when there is a
system in place
On 1 January 2013, at 21:16, Chris H wrote:
On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski tak...@takeda.tk wrote:
That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
decide
Hello Doug,
Tuesday, January 1, 2013, 9:30:14 PM, you wrote:
Thank God! I'd hate to think that after unwinding years accumulated
CVS process, to rewind it for SVN, only to have to do it again for GIT,
just seems a bit masochistic.
Is the cvs code going away?
I'm not in any way FreeBSD dev,
On 1/1/13 9:30 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 1 January 2013, at 21:16, Chris H wrote:
On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski tak...@takeda.tk wrote:
That said I would totally understand you
Hi,
the last batch of changes to bge caused the ipmi to stop working on a
Sun Fire X2200 M2, and
bge0: Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet Controller, ASIC rev. 0x009003 mem
0xfdff-0xfdff,0xfdfe-0xfdfe irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci6
bge0: CHIP ID 0x9003; ASIC REV 0x09; CHIP REV
On 2013-Jan-01 21:30:14 -0800, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
Is the cvs code going away?
There has been some discussion about removing CVS from the base system
now it is no longer used. No concensus was reached, so it's not going
away immediately (and would not be removed from 9.x or earlier
33 matches
Mail list logo
