On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 06:50:09PM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:26:47 +0200,
Mateusz Guzik mjgu...@gmail.com a ?crit :
Hello,
I'm seeing a panic while trying to build a poudriere repository.
As far I can see it always happens when gam_server is
I'll try it out soon, thanks!
-adrian
On 15 July 2013 14:35, Taku YAMAMOTO t...@tackymt.homeip.net wrote:
This reminds me of my local patch which I wrote and forgot about deep in
the git :)
This hack was required to have working USB ports on X61 after resume,
but I'm not sure whether it's
Nope, no such joy.
What else can I try?
-adrian
On 16 July 2013 02:16, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'll try it out soon, thanks!
-adrian
On 15 July 2013 14:35, Taku YAMAMOTO t...@tackymt.homeip.net wrote:
This reminds me of my local patch which I wrote and forgot about deep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
W dniu 2013-07-12 09:03, Hiroki Sato pisze:
Please let me know if the existing configurations and/or the new
formats do not work. The following is a summary of the supported
rc.conf variables, FYI:
Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote in
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 6:12, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
What is the current, non deprecated way, to configure IP addresses in
rc.conf? Let's say for a dual stack, multi IP box I need to set:
10.0.0.66/28 and 10.0.0.67-78 as aliases and
fdda:5cc1:23:4::1/48 and fdda:5cc1:23:4::2-f as aliases
W dniu 2013-07-16 13:29, Mark Felder pisze:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 6:12, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
What is the current, non deprecated way, to configure IP addresses in
rc.conf? Let's say for a dual stack, multi IP box I need to set:
10.0.0.66/28 and 10.0.0.67-78 as aliases and
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 7:21, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
I'm using ipv4_addrs_em0 now (and ipv6_addrs_em0 with Kimmo Paasiala's
patch), but Hiroki Sato wrote:
hr# IPv4 address range spec. Now deprecated.
hripv4_addr_em0=10.2.1.1-10
So I'm a little confused now :)
As am I...
Hi!
Approx. two years ago there was a thread on -stable about MCA output.
See
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-October/064083.html
for a post from Jeremy Chadwick with a link to a AMD paper on
that topic ?
http://www.amd.com/us/Documents/47644A_ecc_embedded.pdf
which is
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Mark Felder f...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 7:21, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
I'm using ipv4_addrs_em0 now (and ipv6_addrs_em0 with Kimmo Paasiala's
patch), but Hiroki Sato wrote:
hr# IPv4 address range spec. Now deprecated.
hr
Op maandag 15 juli 2013 schreef Alfred Perlstein (alf...@ixsystems.com) het
volgende:
On 7/15/13 7:13 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:48:40AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/15/13 5:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 15.07.2013 08:38, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:19:31 -0500, Kevin Oberman
[1]rkober...@gmail.com wrote:
It didn't. 10.2.1.1-10 syntax did.
I'm not totally clear on this yet -- the entire concept of being able
to do *ranges* is deprecated? Or is it deprecated because it's missing
the CIDR?
Thanks
References
Op maandag 15 juli 2013 schreef Alfred Perlstein
(alf...@ixsystems.com) het
volgende:
On 7/15/13 7:13 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:48:40AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/15/13 5:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 15.07.2013 08:38,
Le Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:05:55 +0300,
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hello,
Thanks Konstantin. I'm trying your patch and that looks better.
poudriere runs since 3 hours now (before the box paniced few minutes
after I start a poudriere bulk)
(I've removed the previous change to
Sato-san,
You have provided a very useful summary of ifconfig parameters for rc.conf.
However, you are missing one example that would provide
clearer understanding. Would you please advise if
ipv4_addr_em0=10.2.1.1-10/32
is deprecated, backward compatible or remains valid into the future?
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 03:14:38 -0700
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Nope, no such joy.
What else can I try?
Maybe sysctl dev.[uoex]hci.*.wake=1 works.
Other than that I have out of my ideas :(...
-adrian
On 16 July 2013 02:16, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'll try it
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:14:36PM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:05:55 +0300,
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com a ?crit :
Hello,
Thanks Konstantin. I'm trying your patch and that looks better.
poudriere runs since 3 hours now (before the box paniced few
16 matches
Mail list logo
