Le Mon, 23 Sep 2013 23:31:41 +0300,
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hello,
...
Ok This has been mfced to 9.2-STABLE. But I still see this panic
with 9-2/STABLE of today (Revision : 255811). This may be better
because before the box paniced within minutes and now within
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 09:44:27AM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Mon, 23 Sep 2013 23:31:41 +0300,
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com a ?crit :
Hello,
...
Ok This has been mfced to 9.2-STABLE. But I still see this panic
with 9-2/STABLE of today (Revision : 255811). This
Le Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:29:09 +0300,
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hello,
...
Ok This has been mfced to 9.2-STABLE. But I still see this panic
with 9-2/STABLE of today (Revision : 255811). This may be better
because before the box paniced within minutes and now
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:47:38AM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:29:09 +0300,
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com a ?crit :
Hello,
...
Ok This has been mfced to 9.2-STABLE. But I still see this panic
with 9-2/STABLE of today (Revision : 255811).
Konstantin Belousov wrote this message on Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 15:14 +0300:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:47:38AM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:29:09 +0300,
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com a ?crit :
Hello,
...
Ok This has been mfced to
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:45:17AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
I'd like to understand why you think protecting these functions w/
the _DETACHED check is correct... In kern_event.c, all calls to
f_detach are followed by knote_drop which will ensure that the knote
is removed and free, so no
Hello Jack, list,
I've been dealing with a nagging problem for a day now and decided to ask a
quick question here.
Basically I am building a brand new FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE router which has a
dual port fiber NIC (X520-SR2 10GbE Dual-Port Server Adapter (82599ES)
10GBASE-SR - LC). The network card
