FreeBSD_stable_10 - Build #1750 - Fixed

2015-10-08 Thread jenkins-admin
FreeBSD_stable_10 - Build #1750 - Fixed: Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_stable_10/1750/ Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_stable_10/1750/changes Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_stable_10/1750/console Change summaries: 289

FreeBSD_stable_10 - Build #1749 - Failure

2015-10-08 Thread jenkins-admin
FreeBSD_stable_10 - Build #1749 - Failure: Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_stable_10/1749/ Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_stable_10/1749/changes Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_stable_10/1749/console Change summaries: 2

Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance

2015-10-08 Thread Rick Macklem
Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi, > > I've now MFC'ed r287775 to 10-stable and 9-stable. I hope this will > resolve the issues with m_defrag() being called on too long mbuf chains > due to an off-by-one in the driver TSO parameters and that it will be > easier to maintain these parameters in the fu

Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance

2015-10-08 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi, I've now MFC'ed r287775 to 10-stable and 9-stable. I hope this will resolve the issues with m_defrag() being called on too long mbuf chains due to an off-by-one in the driver TSO parameters and that it will be easier to maintain these parameters in the future. Some comments were made tha