Re: LSI SAS 3108 RAID Controller

2016-02-03 Thread Zara Kanaeva
Thank you for all responds. set hw.mfi.mrsas_enable=1 in Loader prompt did the work. The useful information for this problem can be found here: http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2014-July/128703.html Regards, Z.K. Zitat von Zara Kanaeva :

Re: LSI SAS 3108 RAID Controller

2016-02-03 Thread krad
Just a sanity check 1st. Are you going to be using zfs or ufs? If zfs you probably want the reflash the card the the relevant HBA firmware rather the the raid firmware. This will expose the disks nativly which is best for zfs. Sorry if this isn't appropriate for you but I would thought I would

Re: 10.2-RELEASE-p12 pf+GRE crashing

2016-02-03 Thread Matthew Grooms
On 2/3/2016 4:56 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: All, I recently upgraded a pair of 10.0-RELEASE firewalls in the hope that I could avoid the local patching required to keep it up and running. Unfortunately, it crashes whenever I reload my pf firewall rule set. If I remove the GRE tunnel

10.2-RELEASE-p12 pf+GRE crashing

2016-02-03 Thread Matthew Grooms
All, I recently upgraded a pair of 10.0-RELEASE firewalls in the hope that I could avoid the local patching required to keep it up and running. Unfortunately, it crashes whenever I reload my pf firewall rule set. If I remove the GRE tunnel configurations from rc.conf, it happily reloads the

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

2016-02-03 Thread Shane Ambler
On 04/02/2016 05:33, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2016-Feb-03 18:23:13 +1030, Shane Ambler wrote: Any chance you get high wired allocations? A high wired allocation is normal for ZFS - ARC shows up as "wired" memory. Sometimes several times in a day I see the wired amount

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

2016-02-03 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le mer 3 fév 16 à 8:53:13 +0100, Shane Ambler écrivait : > Any chance you get high wired allocations? > > Sometimes several times in a day I see the wired amount shown in top > rise to over 6GB (of 8GB) bringing the system to a crawl. When wired > gets over 7GB the

Re: possible em regression (was Re: svn commit: r294958 - in stable/10: share/man/man4 sys/dev/e1000 sys/dev/ixgb sys/dev/netmap)

2016-02-03 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 2/1/2016 5:27 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:11:29PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> On 1/30/2016 12:26 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: >>> >>> Ah, okay, that at least makes sense. Can you please verify that with >>> the attached patch applied, you have a setup that works out of

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

2016-02-03 Thread Karl Denninger
(Whistling.) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187594 (see if that helps you) On 2/3/2016 10:47, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le mer 3 fév 16 à 8:53:13 +0100, Shane Ambler > écrivait : > >> Any chance you get high wired allocations? >> >> Sometimes

FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report - Fourth Quarter 2015

2016-02-03 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 FreeBSD Project Quarterly Status Report: October - December 2015 The fourth quarter of 2015 saw a great deal of activity for FreeBSD. This is now the third quarter running for which I can say that this is the largest report yet published!

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

2016-02-03 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2016-Feb-03 18:23:13 +1030, Shane Ambler wrote: >Any chance you get high wired allocations? A high wired allocation is normal for ZFS - ARC shows up as "wired" memory. >Sometimes several times in a day I see the wired amount shown in top >rise to over 6GB (of 8GB)

Re: LSI SAS 3108 RAID Controller

2016-02-03 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 2/3/2016 9:20 AM, krad wrote: > > If zfs you probably want the reflash the card the the relevant HBA firmware > rather the the raid firmware. This will expose the disks nativly which is > best for zfs. The version of card I have allows you to expose the individual disks as JBODs out of the

Re: Sanity check: FreeBSD 9.3 binaries on FreeBSD 9.1?

2016-02-03 Thread Alan Amesbury
Alfred Perlstein said: > It's possible they may work, but that is not guaranteed. > > Packages built on 9.1 should work on 9.3. > > Packages built on 9.3 may work on 9.1, but that would only be by chance. OK, it sounds like testing is in order to make sure, but the probability