Re: HAST, zfs and local mirroring

2016-06-02 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2016-Jun-02 12:12:35 +0500, "Eugene M. Zheganin" wrote: >differs a lot ? And why should I prefere this overcomplicated scheme >over the geom_mirror, which seems rather simple when comparing. Seems >like I can point HAST to /dev/mirror/whatever device, right ? Because using

vt(4) and HP iLO

2016-06-02 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hi. Recently I've updates some of my HP DL g6 servers to vt(4) console driver. These servers are equipped with lo100i IPMI management device (basically it mimics IPMI). After some time I connected to it's web-interface and opened the Virtual KVM tab, Then I saw this:

Re: HAST, zfs and local mirroring

2016-06-02 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:12:35PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > On 01.06.16 18:23, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > Only FS support changed data bypass FS layer is Files-11 ODS-2 level, > > may be hardware support required. > > > > Can you use ZFS mirror with one vdev local and

unbound and ntp issuse

2016-06-02 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
Default install with local_unbound and ntpd can't be functional with incorrect date/time in BIOS: Unbound requred correct time for DNSSEC check and refuseing queries ("Jul 1 20:17:29 yellowrat unbound: [3444:0] info: failed to prime trust anchor -- DNSKEY rrset is not secure . DNSKEY IN") ntpd

Re: HAST, zfs and local mirroring

2016-06-02 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hi. On 01.06.16 18:23, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > Only FS support changed data bypass FS layer is Files-11 ODS-2 level, > may be hardware support required. > > Can you use ZFS mirror with one vdev local and other vdev by iSCSI? > Every node using separate ZFS pool in this case. If you mean