Re: ue1 and ue2 swinging

2016-09-05 Thread Eric A. Borisch
On Sunday, September 4, 2016, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 00:00:38 -0500 > "Eric A. Borisch" > wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Eric A. Borisch > wrote: > > > On Saturday, September 3, 2016, Nenhum_de_Nos < > math...@eternamente.info > > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On Fri

Re: unionfs bugs, a partial patch and some comments [Was: Re: 1-BETA3 Panic: __lockmgr_args: downgrade a recursed lockmgr nfs @ /usr/local/share/deploy-tools/RELENG_11/src/sys/fs/unionfs/union_vnops.c

2016-09-05 Thread Rick Macklem
Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: >Bezüglich Rick Macklem's Nachricht vom 18.08.2016 02:03 (localtime): >> Kostik wrote: >> [stuff snipped] >>> insmnque() performs the cleanup on its own, and that default cleanup isnot >>> suitable >for the situation. I think that insmntque1() would betterfit >>> your

Re: AIO not working on NFS share - ? Regression

2016-09-05 Thread Jim Ohlstein
Hello, On 09/05/2016 04:34 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 02:26:30PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote: Just to get your webserver out of the picture, could you please try running the aio test suite on an NFS share? Do it like this: $ cd /usr/tests/sys/aio $ export TMPFS=/path/t

Re: AIO not working on NFS share - ? Regression

2016-09-05 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 02:26:30PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote: > Just to get your webserver out of the picture, could you please try > running the aio test suite on an NFS share? Do it like this: > $ cd /usr/tests/sys/aio > $ export TMPFS=/path/to/some/nfs/share > $ kyua test By default, unsafe aio

Re: AIO not working on NFS share - ? Regression

2016-09-05 Thread Alan Somers
Just to get your webserver out of the picture, could you please try running the aio test suite on an NFS share? Do it like this: $ cd /usr/tests/sys/aio $ export TMPFS=/path/to/some/nfs/share $ kyua test -Alan On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > Hello, > > For sometime now we'

AIO not working on NFS share - ? Regression

2016-09-05 Thread Jim Ohlstein
Hello, For sometime now we've used a backend (non-internet accessible) server to generate static content that is shared via NFS to a front-end server for internet access. Both machines use ZFS exclusively. The webserver is nginx and we had AIO set to on, with the AIO module built into the ke

Jenkins build is back to stable : FreeBSD_stable_10 #377

2016-09-05 Thread jenkins-admin
See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-05 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 11:50:28AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > How to interoperable with USB stack (I am beware USB keyboard may be > > locked)? > > I've just done serial console, so I'm not sure. I think that it works... IPMI or hardware? > >> I've seen this at Netflix on one variant of our

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-05 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:14:59AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: >> > >> >> On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa O

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-05 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:14:59AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > >> On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >> > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-05 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > >> On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >> > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). >> > Under high network load and may be addtional conditional sy

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-09-05 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). > > Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system go to > > unresponsible state -- no reaction to network and