Hi -
On 15.08.2016, at 19:01, Michael Grimm wrote:
> I recently upgraded from 10.3-STABLE to 11.0-PRERELEASE. Now, I am missing
> those parts in my daily security report regarding pf, e.g.:
>
> example.private pf denied packets:
> +block drop in on ix0 all [
On 10/13/16 5:17 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:06:00PM +0200, Julien Charbon wrote:
>
will give you that trace in the core, and without INVARIANT then it is
better to use dtrace:
$ cat tcp-twstart-dropped.d
fbt::tcp_twstart:entry
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:06:00PM +0200, Julien Charbon wrote:
> >> will give you that trace in the core, and without INVARIANT then it is
> >> better to use dtrace:
> >>
> >> $ cat tcp-twstart-dropped.d
> >> fbt::tcp_twstart:entry
> >> /args[0]->t_inpcb->inp_flags & 0x0400/
> >> {
> >>
Hi Slawa,
On 10/13/16 4:38 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:56:21PM +0200, Julien Charbon wrote:
Something like:
>>>
>>> Yes, thanks!
>>
>> Proposed changes added in the review:
>>
>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8211
>>
>> tell me when you have three days
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:56:21PM +0200, Julien Charbon wrote:
> >> Something like:
> >
> > Yes, thanks!
>
> Proposed changes added in the review:
>
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8211
>
> tell me when you have three days without issue with this change.
>
> >> tcp_detach() {
> >>
> >>
Pete French wrote:
Ok, thats a bit worry if true - but I can confirm that l2arc works fine
under 10.3 on amd64, so what you say about cross-compling might be true.
Am taking an inetrest in this as I have just dpeloyed a lot of machines
which are going to be relying on l2arc working to get
Hi Slawa,
On 10/12/16 5:42 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 05:17:35PM +0200, Julien Charbon wrote:
>
>> I see, thus just for the context: The TCP stack in sys/dev/cxgb*
>> is a
>> TOE (TCP Offload Engine?) TCP stack for Chelsio NICs, it is a
On 12/10/2016 23:18, Peter wrote:
> Details:
> After upgrading 2 machines from 9.3 to 10.3-STABLE, on one of them the
> l2arc stays empty (capacity alloc = 0), although it is online and gets
> accessed. It did work well on 9.3.
>
> I did the following tests:
> * Create a zpool on a stick, with
Ok, thats a bit worry if true - but I can confirm that l2arc works fine
under 10.3 on amd64, so what you say about cross-compling might be true.
Am taking an inetrest in this as I have just dpeloyed a lot of machines
which are going to be relying on l2arc working to get reasobale performance.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aryeh Friedman
Date: Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:59 AM
Subject: Re: 11-RELEASE PL1 doesn't load kernel modules with ZFS-on-Root
To: Kurt Jaeger
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
On 13/10/2016 07:04, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> Please check dmesg(8)
> for more details.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
11 matches
Mail list logo