Re: FreeBSD 11 : running blacklistd needed for 520.pfdenied?

2016-10-13 Thread Michael Grimm
Hi - On 15.08.2016, at 19:01, Michael Grimm wrote: > I recently upgraded from 10.3-STABLE to 11.0-PRERELEASE. Now, I am missing > those parts in my daily security report regarding pf, e.g.: > > example.private pf denied packets: > +block drop in on ix0 all [

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-10-13 Thread Julien Charbon
On 10/13/16 5:17 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:06:00PM +0200, Julien Charbon wrote: > will give you that trace in the core, and without INVARIANT then it is better to use dtrace: $ cat tcp-twstart-dropped.d fbt::tcp_twstart:entry

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-10-13 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:06:00PM +0200, Julien Charbon wrote: > >> will give you that trace in the core, and without INVARIANT then it is > >> better to use dtrace: > >> > >> $ cat tcp-twstart-dropped.d > >> fbt::tcp_twstart:entry > >> /args[0]->t_inpcb->inp_flags & 0x0400/ > >> { > >>

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-10-13 Thread Julien Charbon
Hi Slawa, On 10/13/16 4:38 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:56:21PM +0200, Julien Charbon wrote: Something like: >>> >>> Yes, thanks! >> >> Proposed changes added in the review: >> >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8211 >> >> tell me when you have three days

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-10-13 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:56:21PM +0200, Julien Charbon wrote: > >> Something like: > > > > Yes, thanks! > > Proposed changes added in the review: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8211 > > tell me when you have three days without issue with this change. > > >> tcp_detach() { > >> > >>

Re: ZFS l2arc broken in 10.3

2016-10-13 Thread Peter
Pete French wrote: Ok, thats a bit worry if true - but I can confirm that l2arc works fine under 10.3 on amd64, so what you say about cross-compling might be true. Am taking an inetrest in this as I have just dpeloyed a lot of machines which are going to be relying on l2arc working to get

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

2016-10-13 Thread Julien Charbon
Hi Slawa, On 10/12/16 5:42 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 05:17:35PM +0200, Julien Charbon wrote: > >> I see, thus just for the context: The TCP stack in sys/dev/cxgb* >> is a >> TOE (TCP Offload Engine?) TCP stack for Chelsio NICs, it is a

Re: ZFS l2arc broken in 10.3

2016-10-13 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 12/10/2016 23:18, Peter wrote: > Details: > After upgrading 2 machines from 9.3 to 10.3-STABLE, on one of them the > l2arc stays empty (capacity alloc = 0), although it is online and gets > accessed. It did work well on 9.3. > > I did the following tests: > * Create a zpool on a stick, with

Re: ZFS l2arc broken in 10.3

2016-10-13 Thread Pete French
Ok, thats a bit worry if true - but I can confirm that l2arc works fine under 10.3 on amd64, so what you say about cross-compling might be true. Am taking an inetrest in this as I have just dpeloyed a lot of machines which are going to be relying on l2arc working to get reasobale performance.

Fwd: 11-RELEASE PL1 doesn't load kernel modules with ZFS-on-Root

2016-10-13 Thread Aryeh Friedman
-- Forwarded message -- From: Aryeh Friedman Date: Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:59 AM Subject: Re: 11-RELEASE PL1 doesn't load kernel modules with ZFS-on-Root To: Kurt Jaeger On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:

Re: 11-RELEASE PL1 doesn't load kernel modules with ZFS-on-Root

2016-10-13 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 13/10/2016 07:04, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > Please check dmesg(8) > for more details. -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to