Re: IPv6 works on em0 () but not on em1 () - what's wrong?,IPv6 works on em0 () but not on em1 () - what's wrong?

Hello Hiroki, Wednesday, January 11, 2017, 2:43:28 AM, you wrote: > What happens by typing the following command? > % ping6 ff02::1%em1 % ping6 ff02::1%em1 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) fe80::225:90ff:fe24:6bf8%em1 --> ff02::1%em1 16 bytes from fe80::225:90ff:fe24:6bf8%em1, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64

General question about 1GB vs 10GB NIC's

I want to build a router that has 2 x 500mb/s radio ISP facing, 2 x 500mb/s radio's facing another site, plus a 1gb/s link to the LAN. I plan to plug everything into a switch so I can have redundant routers. So my question is should I go with 5 x 1GB NIC's or 2x10GB NIC's on the motherboard.

Re: IPv6 works on em0 () but not on em1 () - what's wrong?,IPv6 works on em0 () but not on em1 () - what's wrong?

Lev Serebryakov wrote in <58756dde.5000...@freebsd.org>,<58756dde.5000...@freebsd.org>: le> le> I have MoBo (Supermicro X9SCL-F) with two 1G NICs, first one (em0) is le> based on 82579LM, and second one (em1) is based on 82574L. le> le> When I'm using em0 with simple

IPv6 works on em0 () but not on em1 () - what's wrong?

I have MoBo (Supermicro X9SCL-F) with two 1G NICs, first one (em0) is based on 82579LM, and second one (em1) is based on 82574L. When I'm using em0 with simple config: ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.134.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 9000" ifconfig_em0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv" everything works

Re: Cannot update system from 11-RELEASE-p2 to 11-RELEASE-p6

2017-01-07 23:38 GMT+01:00 Holger Kipp : > Dear Fernando, > > > On 7 Jan 2017, at 23:27, Fernando Herrero Carrón > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am seeing a strange behaviour. I run freebsd-update fetch: > > > > % sudo freebsd-update fetch > > Password:

Re: [RFC/RFT] projects/ipsec

Hi All, I ported the changes from projects/ipsec to stable/11 branch. So, if it is more suitable for testing, please, welcome. You can checkout the sources from github: https://github.com/bu7cher/freebsd/tree/stable/11 Also I made the standalone patch:

Vestibular SENAI 2017/1 - Oportunidade de 50% de desconto no 1º semestre para ex-aluno SENAI

___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

objcopy on 11-STABLE vs 10-STABLE

I run an iscsi setup booting using ixpe, which I build on the FreeBSD server. the last few steps of the build do this: objcopy -O binary -R .zinfo bin/ipxe.pxe.tmp bin/ipxe.pxe.bin objcopy -O binary -j .zinfo bin/ipxe.pxe.tmp bin/ipxe.pxe.zinfo This runs fine on 10-STABLE, but on

intel 10gbe nic bug in 10.3 - no carrier

Hello everyone, we're trying to tackle a rare bug that is very hard to debug. Our 10.3-RELEASE servers can panic boot and subsequently can come up without network (2x - no carrier). We've seen this on 10.3-RELEASE-p0 we have never seen this before. root@storage ~ # pciconf -lv | grep -B3