Re: dev.cpu.0.freq/dev.cpu.0.freq_levels support on E5v4

2017-01-14 Thread Ultima
Check bios settings. I think this occurs if the c states are set to hardware controlled and not set to software controlled. The setting names and values may may vary depending on the manufacturer. On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > I am have stable/11

Urgente : Banco Itau 30 Horas - Central de Atendimento 0001o28o

2017-01-14 Thread Itau 30 Horas .
___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Mark Martinec
Thanks to all who responded, makes perfect sense now. Paul Mather wrote: The only thing you need on the host is to have the linux kernel module loaded. (You don't need to have any Linux packages installed there.) The default setting in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf is to have NOLINUX=yes

Re: stable/11 debugging kernel unable to produce crashdump

2017-01-14 Thread Mark Johnston
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 06:40:02PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > > I suspect that this is because we only stop the scheduler upon a panic > > if SMP is configured. Can you retest with the patch below applied? > > > > Index: sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c > >

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:11:42 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:07:09 +0100 Mark Martinec > wrote: >> When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a >> command line in a terminal window) I'm noticing

dev.cpu.0.freq/dev.cpu.0.freq_levels support on E5v4

2017-01-14 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
I am have stable/11 and E5v4. I am don't see cpufreq support by sysctl: # sysctl dev.cpu.0 dev.cpu.0.cx_method: C1/hlt dev.cpu.0.cx_usage_counters: 61755 dev.cpu.0.cx_usage: 100.00% last 1us dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C2 dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/1/1 dev.cpu.0.%parent: acpi0 dev.cpu.0.%pnpinfo:

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Paul Mather
On Jan 14, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:07:09 +0100 Mark Martinec > wrote: >> When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a >> command line in a terminal window) I'm noticing occasional

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:07:09 +0100 Mark Martinec wrote: > When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a > command line in a terminal window) I'm noticing occasional streams of > diagnostic: > >ELF binary type "3" not known. > > which seem

kernel ipfw rlock/wlock panic in stable/11

2017-01-14 Thread Eugene Grosbein
_flags = 16842752, lo_data = 0, lo_witness = 0x0}, mtx_lock = 4}, _rm_lock_sx = {lock_object = {lo_name = 0xc0a802a2 "IPFW static rules", lo_flags = 16842752, lo_data = 0, lo_witness = 0x0}, sx_lock = 4}}} Full kgdb script here: http://www.grosbein.net/freebsd/crash/20170114

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 14.01.2017, 12:18, "René Ladan" : > > Op 14 jan. 2017 01:07 schreef "Mark Martinec" < > mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si > >> : > > When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a

kernel ipfw rlock/wlock panic in stable/11

2017-01-14 Thread Eugene Grosbein
_flags = 16842752, lo_data = 0, lo_witness = 0x0}, mtx_lock = 4}, _rm_lock_sx = {lock_object = {lo_name = 0xc0a802a2 "IPFW static rules", lo_flags = 16842752, lo_data = 0, lo_witness = 0x0}, sx_lock = 4}}} Full kgdb script here: http://www.grosbein.net/freebsd/crash/20170114

Re: stable/11 debugging kernel unable to produce crashdump

2017-01-14 Thread Eugene Grosbein
> I suspect that this is because we only stop the scheduler upon a panic > if SMP is configured. Can you retest with the patch below applied? > > Index: sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c > === > --- sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c (revision

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
14.01.2017, 12:18, "René Ladan" : > Op 14 jan. 2017 01:07 schreef "Mark Martinec" > : > > When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a command > line in a terminal window) I'm noticing occasional streams of diagnostic: > >  

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread René Ladan
Op 14 jan. 2017 01:07 schreef "Mark Martinec" : When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a command line in a terminal window) I'm noticing occasional streams of diagnostic: ELF binary type "3" not known. which seem to be related to