On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 08:38:04PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
> 2018-08-04 19:01, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > I think running "zpool list" is adding a lot of noise to the output.
> > Could you retry without doing that?
>
> No, like I said previously, the "zpool list" (with one defunct
> zfs pool) *i
2018-08-04 19:01, Mark Johnston wrote:
I think running "zpool list" is adding a lot of noise to the output.
Could you retry without doing that?
No, like I said previously, the "zpool list" (with one defunct
zfs pool) *is* the sole culprit of the zfs memory leak.
With each invocation of "zpool l
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:11:42PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
> More attempts at tracking this down. The suggested dtrace command does
> usually abort with:
>
>Assertion failed: (buf->dtbd_timestamp >= first_timestamp),
> file
> /usr/src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_