Hi.
Maybe different problem (as mav@ noted) with Garrett's but related to
parallel-mounting.
*For Garrett's problem, +1 with Trond. For myself, I incorporate
drive type and No. in pool name to avoid collision between 2
physical drives (one working, and one emergency) in the same host.
Hi,
I am not sure how the original description leads to conclusion that
problem is related to parallel mounting. From my point of view it
sounds like a problem that root pool mounting happens based on name, not
pool GUID that needs to be passed from the loader. We have seen problem
like that
