On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 7:46:25 AM CET Helge Oldach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stefan Ehmann wrote on Tue, 09 Feb 2021 23:23:32 +0100 (CET):
> > I'm having issues with stale TCP connections after the upgrade from 12.2
> > to
> > 13.0-BETA1.
> >
> > Symptoms:
> > Outgoing TCP connections no longer
11.02.2021 6:26, Pete French wrote:
> I have a machine runnign 12-STABLE, which gets its upstream IP address from
> my ISP using DHCP over a cable modem. What I just tried to do was to set the
> MAC address on that interface at boot time, but if I do that then it no
> longer acquires a DHCP
I have a machine runnign 12-STABLE, which gets its upstream IP address
from my ISP using DHCP over a cable modem. What I just tried to do was
to set the MAC address on that interface at boot time, but if I do that
then it no longer acquires a DHCP address from the upstream.
Is there something
Will it be likely/possible that the dialog processor in the base will be
updated to include the fixes that have already
appeared in the cdialog port?
This has been an issue since day one or 13.0-CURRENT.
Thanks for any assistance that you can provide.
David Boyd.
On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 7:46:25 AM CET Helge Oldach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stefan Ehmann wrote on Tue, 09 Feb 2021 23:23:32 +0100 (CET):
> > I'm having issues with stale TCP connections after the upgrade from 12.2
> > to
> > 13.0-BETA1.
> >
> > Symptoms:
> > Outgoing TCP connections no longer
Hi,
I've used mergemaster for years like this:
1. mergemaster -p after the make installkernel step
2. mergemaster -Ui after the make installworld step
Although I've seen nothing announced making etcupdate mandatory,
I guess etcupdate will be the new way of doing things.
My questions are:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:40:43PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote:
The new ZFS is backwards compatible with the old one. So your 12.2-p3
system will be able to zfs send, and the stable/13 will be able to zfs
recv. You can go the other direction too, if you're careful to create the
new pool using
On 10.02.2021 10:40, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Stefan, Would you check that you have net.inet.tcp.always_keepalive=1,
> and perhaps that net.inet.tcp.keepidle and net.inet.tcp.keepintvl are
> reasonable to ensure that the expected keep alives are running. I don't
> have a FreeBSD 13 to view the
