l problem with sysinstall needing to re-scan devices to see the
drives (but that's a sysinstall bug, see the other thread for details).
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mai
n devices. Never needed that across
thousands of installs (dating to 2.2.8), and didn't even know it existed.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
onfirmed the behavior with the SATA set to IDE, AHCI,
and RAID modes. (The drives were recognized as da0 and da1 during bootup
in all three modes, but not by sysinstall.)
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
free
Hi there,
Does anybody know if there are plans to support the Intel c602 chipset any
time soon?
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On May 12, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Andy Dills wrote:
> > I'm working on getting p0f integrated with amavisd-new. Everything is
> > great, with the exception that I can't get the neccessary commands to
>
g to do with redirecting stdout and stderr to
another script which is then shoved into the background?
How do I work around this?
(BTW, FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #2: Wed May 12 13:28:18 EDT 2010)
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
_
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 10:16 AM 8/6/2008, Andy Dills wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to setup pptpd to enable VPN connections. This worked well in
> > all versions of FreeBSD prior to 7.
>
> I would turf pptpd and look at mpd51 from the ports. It is far
;t really an option, and #1 isn't clear to me. I tried a couple of
different configurations and the interface never seems to get set
correctly.
Suggestions?
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
freebsd-st
mselves now if not for the customers
> at this stage.
Oh, they have them for the customers. They just don't want to upgrade
their routers.
> There is a reasonable chance that this mail will leave here
> over IPv6 for some of the recipients. It will almost
>
want an option
> to take IPV6 out ?
>
> I am genuinely piuzzled - why isn't "ipv6_enabled="NO" sufficient ? That's
> what I do on IPv4 networks and it works fine for me.
That's actually a good point. I've had a hard time shedding my "trim
every
nt technological motivation, and
given the significant potential for optimization of existing IPv4 space
both via technology and financial incentive, I see a minimum of five years
before IPv6 is common.
In the meantime, I'd like to only enable IPv6 on IPv6 enabled networks.
Andy
be bound to lo0.
No worries regardless, netmasks are a common source of misunderstanding
and confusion. In a routing context, the subnet mask does indeed affect
every address within the subnet, however when binding addresses to an
interface, the subnet mask merely controls which addresses are reac
ndeed configured rbldns to serve
multiple zones. Or just bind the additional loopback instances
BTW, /etc/netstart is a nice shortcut to avoid fatfingering an ifconfig.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
freebs
n creating the 127.0.0.2 (etc) interfaces
on lo0?
On 7.0-R, I just ifconfig'ed 127.0.0.2 as an alias to lo0 with a subnet
mask of 255.255.255.255, and I was able to bind/listen/accept on it with
no problem.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
#x27;
in_proto.o(.data+0x130): undefined reference to `sctp_drain'
in_proto.o(.data+0x134): undefined reference to `sctp_usrreqs'
Is this intended and/or a known issue?
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
e said for version maturity in
general.
I was hoping to wait for 6.4-R before jumping to the 6 line, but 6.2 is
looking pretty solid for my purposes, so it seems like a great time to
start migrating. I'm curious if anybody else is planning to migrate a
large number of 4-STABLE boxes to 6-ST
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Scott Long wrote:
> Doug White wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Andy Dills wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'm trying to get a Supermicro 6024H-32R setup with 6.1, but I'm
> > > discovering that the Adaptec SAS AIC9410 controller isn&
the mpt
driver...is anybody using this in production?
I'd prefer to use FreeBSD, but I'm guessing I'm going to need to do SuSE
for this box, which Adaptec provides drivers for.
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
_
18 matches
Mail list logo
