Re: FreeBSD on 64MB memory

2018-02-12 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
> On Feb 11, 2018, at 9:19 PM, Eugene Grosbein <eu...@grosbein.net> wrote: > > 12.02.2018 11:56, Ask Bjørn Hansen пишет: >> Hi, >> >> I have an old Soekris system with 64MB memory that I upgraded from 10.3 to >> 11.1 recently. Since then it’s started

FreeBSD on 64MB memory

2018-02-11 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
Hi, I have an old Soekris system with 64MB memory that I upgraded from 10.3 to 11.1 recently. Since then it’s started hanging every few days. Today I happened to have a “top” instance running on the serial console. The system is minimally responsive to the network (ICMP and CARP are working,

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-BETA2 Now Available

2016-07-24 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
> On Jul 24, 2016, at 20:32 , Brandon Allbery wrote: > > Quoting the announcement (although this should really have been earlier than > it was): Ah, indeed. Thank you Brandon. Yes, I was looking for it and missed it after skimming over the “Vagrant stuff” heading. Ask

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-BETA2 Now Available

2016-07-24 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
freebsd-update gives me the “The update metadata is correctly signed, but failed an integrity check.” error, is that expected or is there something wrong with my system? Ask # freebsd-update -r 11.0-BETA2 upgrade Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching metadata

Re: panic: kmem_malloc(8192): kmem_map too small: 39460864 total allocated

2013-01-24 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Jan 24, 2013, at 0:48, Ask Bjørn Hansen a...@develooper.com wrote: Hi everyone, I upgraded my NanoBSD image from 9.0 (from May 2012) to 9.1 from a few days ago. Booting the new image on a pcEngines Alix board it panics with a kmem_map too small error when mounting the disk. Any

panic: kmem_malloc(8192): kmem_map too small: 39460864 total allocated

2013-01-24 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
Hi everyone, I upgraded my NanoBSD image from 9.0 (from May 2012) to 9.1 from a few days ago. Booting the new image on a pcEngines Alix board it panics with a kmem_map too small error when mounting the disk. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? Ask Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ada0s2a

Re: panic: kmem_malloc(8192): kmem_map too small: 39460864 total allocated

2013-01-24 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Jan 24, 2013, at 1:16, Göran Löwkrantz goran.lowkra...@ismobile.com wrote: Search for cam clt kmem in the lists. I had to add kern.cam.ctl.disable=1 on a Soekris box with 9.1. Thanks Göran; that did indeed fix it. Michael Moll sent me the same solution off-list and a link to

freebsd-update mergemaster options

2012-12-10 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
Hi, On an 8.2 box, I run freebsd-update -r 8.3-RELEASE upgrade I am getting hundreds of files with conflicts like: current version # $FreeBSD: src/etc/auth.conf,v 1.6.32.1.4.1 2010/06/14 02:09:06 kensmith Exp $ === # $FreeBSD: src/etc/auth.conf,v 1.6.32.1.8.1 2012/03/03 06:15:13 kensmith

Re: 8.3-PRERELEASE and ATA_CAM

2012-05-13 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Apr 6, 2012, at 0:48, Daniel Braniss wrote: with the latest svn, I can't compile kernel with options ATA_CAM: ... linking kernel.debug ata-disk.o(.text+0x93): In function `ad_init': /r+d/stable/8.3/sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.c:389: undefined reference to `ata_setmode' I ran into this,

Re: Can't read a full block, only got 8193 bytes.

2012-02-23 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:10, Artem Belevich wrote: [...] Can't read a full block, only got 8193 bytes. That's probably just a side effect of ZFS checksum errors. ZFS will happily read the file until it hits a record with checksum. If redundant info is available (raidz or mirror), ZFS will

Can't read a full block, only got 8193 bytes.

2012-02-18 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
Hi everyone, We're recycling an old database server with room for 16 disks as a backup server (our old database servers had 12-20 15k disks; the new ones one or two SSDs and they're faster). We have a box running FreeBSD 8.2 with 7 disks in a ZFS raidz2 (and a spare). It's using an older

openbgpd / openospf / carp / vlan (on 7.2) trouble

2010-05-25 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
Hi, Since upgrading from openbgpd 4.5 to 4.7 (tried 4.6, too with bad results) openbgpd doesn't work on my vlan interface. I have two routers (10.0.100.2 and .3). That network is on vlan2; with carp2 running .1. Running .3 on 4.6 or 4.7 makes it immediately lose it's route to the 100.0/24

CARP + VLAN = kernel dump

2006-12-14 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
Hi, If I enable carp on a vlan interface in rc.conf the kernel goes boom. This is 6.2-RC from a couple of weeks ago. (IIRC then I had the same problem setting up carp on a bridge'd interface). I'm configuring it like this: ifconfig_vlan2=inet 10.50.0.3/24 vlan 202 vlandev sis2

Re: Running large DB's on FreeBSD

2006-11-12 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Oct 24, 2006, at 7:27 AM, Vivek Khera wrote: I believe the front-end application is MySQL dependent, but what is so much better about PostgreSQL? I understand that it has some more advanced features, but if they are not used, then what is the advantage? (I really like the InnooDB

Re: bootmgr on pc engines wrap board

2006-11-02 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Nov 1, 2006, at 3:48 PM, spoggle wrote: You can prove it by running boot0cfg with the -o nopacket option on the CF card. Whee - that worked, thank you! - ask -- http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

bootmgr on pc engines wrap board

2006-11-01 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
Hi, bootmgr hangs on the PC Engines WRAP board. It's been brought up before on the small@ list (IIRC), but with no solution. It hangs just after 1 FreeBSD 2 FreeBSD I have a stack of the WRAP boards I was going to use for the NTP Pool, but I really want to use a nanobsd style

Re: bootmgr on pc engines wrap board

2006-11-01 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Nov 1, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote: Have you set the bootloader to use serial? Set -h in /boot.config Yes. (the nanobsd build process does that by default, echo -h ${NANO_WORLDDIR}/boot.config ) - ask -- http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/

[panic] running tcpdump panics 6.0-p4 with panic: mutex Giant not owned at /usr/src/sys/net/bpf.c:1407

2006-02-22 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
Hi, If I run: tcpdump -n -i sis0 makes my kernel panic with panic: mutex Giant not owned at /usr/src/sys/net/bpf.c:1407 It doesn't happen if I tcpdump an inactive interface. FWIW there was a similar issue a couple years ago in the if_sis driver panic: mutex Giant not owned at