megamgr on 6.1?

2006-05-09 Thread Brian Szymanski
kernel 21 0xc4bc2000 1a000linux.ko Brian Szymanski Software and Systems Developer Media Matters for America [EMAIL PROTECTED] aim: xbrianskix ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable

Re: megamgr on 6.1?

2006-05-09 Thread Brian Szymanski
I've tried... (and I know for a fact that TERM=xterm works on my linux machines)... Any ideas? Cheers, Brian Brian Szymanski wrote: Hi... I saw this in the 6.1 release notes and eagerly upgraded: The amr(4) driver now supports ioctl(2) requests necessary for Linux LSI MegaRaid tools

Re: megamgr on 6.1?

2006-05-09 Thread Brian Szymanski
On Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:31 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote: Oh, duh, it's been so long since I used linux binary emulation that I forgot all about brandelf... Thanks Michael! ... But now that the binary is properly branded, I get a different error: Error opening terminal: xterm. I

Re: megamgr on 6.1?

2006-05-09 Thread Brian Szymanski
PS - mknod c 254 /compat/linux/dev/megadev0 (which is what the device is under linux) doesn't help :( On Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:31 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote: Oh, duh, it's been so long since I used linux binary emulation that I forgot all about brandelf... Thanks Michael

Re: megamgr on 6.1?

2006-05-09 Thread Brian Szymanski
kldload amr_linux did the trick for me, thanks! Cheers, B Boris Samorodov writes: | On Tue, 9 May 2006 12:37:43 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote: | PS - mknod c 254 /compat/linux/dev/megadev0 (which is what the device is | under linux) doesn't help :( | | I't only my imho, use

Re: well-supported SATA RAID card?

2006-03-12 Thread Brian Szymanski
be happy to raise any other issues you may be seeing. Aside from the that we have had good experiences with Areca card. Steve - Original Message - From: Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] After not having much success with the hptmv driver for highpoint's rocketraid 1820A, I'm

well-supported SATA RAID card?

2006-03-10 Thread Brian Szymanski
good luck with? I've been happy with the megaraid series on linux at my job, but I'm wondering if the management utilities are there on freebsd, etc. Thanks in advance... Brian Szymanski Software and Systems Developer Media Matters for America [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: well-supported SATA RAID card?

2006-03-10 Thread Brian Szymanski
case, I'm actually shooting for reliable and (relatively) cheap :) Fast is nice but I don't much care, so the megaraids look slightly better than this product, but thanks for the tip anyway :) Brian Szymanski Software and Systems Developer Media Matters for America [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: well-supported SATA RAID card?

2006-03-10 Thread Brian Szymanski
Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Brian Szymanski Software and Systems Developer Media Matters for America [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 202.243.9007 work: 202.756.4128 home: 202.470.2578 skype: xbrianskix aim

Re: gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-12 Thread Brian Szymanski
to gvinum on 6-STABLE without a dump/restore? I probably won't do this out of paranoia, but am curious if it's possible. Thanks again and cheers, Brian Brian Szymanski Software and Systems Developer Media Matters for America [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd

Re: gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-11 Thread Brian Szymanski
there is no correlation between gvinum l output and whether the system panics or is happy when I run gvinum create again. Would I have better luck compiling gvinum into the kernel instead of loading the module? What do other folks who have successful config's do? Thanks in advance, Brian Brian Szymanski Software

gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-10 Thread Brian Szymanski
, to stick with 4.x and some early 5.x releases b/c vinum is critical for me... Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Brian Szymanski Software and Systems Developer Media Matters for America [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http

boot0/BIOS problem...

2005-05-30 Thread Brian Szymanski
...) Thanks in advance, Brian Szymanski Software and Systems Developer Media Matters for America [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

iTE IT8212 card/ata problems

2004-12-30 Thread Brian Szymanski
it in hardware-i386.html, but generic ata cards have worked for me in the past - was I just been getting lucky before? Thanks for any ideas. Cheers, Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

dump/restore with ufs2

2004-12-28 Thread Brian Szymanski
this mean my snapshots are being overwritten on the target disk? And if so, that's a good thing, right? Cheers, Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable

Re: vinum raid 5

2004-11-30 Thread Brian Szymanski
Brian == Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brian Actually I experienced a number of bugs with vinum in 5.3 that Brian proved fatal to a root vinum install (in fact, everything on Brian the second ATA channel was marked down after every reboot if I Brian recall correctly). I had

Re: graid3 - requirements or manpage wrong?

2004-11-26 Thread Brian Szymanski
? is it with 5.3? Could I expect 5.2.1 to work? Pardon the barrage of questions, but it would take me hours to test each case, so if anyone knows, drop me a line. Thanks! Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: graid3 - requirements or manpage wrong?

2004-11-26 Thread Brian Szymanski
Brian == Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That is not completely fair for vinum I've been running vinum now for the better of 3-4 years, and even with a set of very flaky seagate IDE drives I never lost a byte. Vinum has served me well, and I trust gvinum will get

Re: graid3 - requirements or manpage wrong?

2004-11-25 Thread Brian Szymanski
appreciate someone sending me a link to where I can read more. Cheers, Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 5.3 on Intel 386 ?

2004-11-25 Thread Brian Szymanski
/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gvinum raid 5 (was re: graid3)

2004-11-25 Thread Brian Szymanski
AN UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY: ufs: /dev/gvinum/big (/home) Automatic file system check failed; help! Pulling power on the RAID0/RAID1 arrays I have does what I expect it to do... Anyone have any idea what's going on here? Cheers, Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED

DEAD THREAD: What OS are you? fun

2004-11-22 Thread Brian Szymanski
This thread needs to die. The speed of light has nothing to do with this mailing list, period. Let this be the last post to it. Thank you! Cheers, Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gregory Bond [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Rob wrote: : : You'd

portupgrade crash on 4.9-stable

2004-11-17 Thread Brian Szymanski
- everytime I cvsup portupgrade wants to generate an INDEX.tmp before it doesn anything... But the real problem is the segfault with ruby, which can be reliably reproduced ad infinitum. Any ideas? Thanks in advance. -- Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] I prefer pgp encrypted email: keyid

Re: portupgrade crash on 4.9-stable

2004-11-17 Thread Brian Szymanski
Administrator Zoology Department University of British Columbia Ph.: 604-822-3882 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 17-Nov-04, at 1:21 PM, Brian Szymanski wrote: Hi, I'm having a problem with portupgrade on 4.9: # portupgrade -f sudo\* Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please

ad0 vs. ad0s1 (was Re: vinum troubles on 5.3)

2004-11-12 Thread Brian Szymanski
. Recovery is trivial when drive C or D goes. Since drives C and D form one raid-5 volume together, just chuck both drives and replace the makeshift drive with a new 200G drive. I am aware of and don't care about the performance hit. Cheers, Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED

vinum troubles on 5.3

2004-11-11 Thread Brian Szymanski
to accomplish the same thing (Raid5 over two disks and 2 half sized disks concatenated together?) or a similar result? Any help would be most appreciated. Cheers, Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

setting kern.ngroups

2003-03-18 Thread Brian Szymanski
with no success, and am working my way down to 16, but I'm not sure if I trust the kernel that I might get by compiling in such a way... Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for reading, Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd

Re: setting kern.ngroups

2003-03-18 Thread Brian Szymanski
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 11:53:00AM -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 11:10, Brian Szymanski wrote: I'm having some trouble setting the (read-only) sysctl value kern.ngroups. Raising the maximum number of groups requires changes all over the place; even if you