Interesting about the drivers - I will look into that tomorrow, I could be on
an older version. I started down that path a little while ago, but when pkng
wasn't quite ready, I just reverted to the old ways/ommands that seemed to
work.
Here is the dump of the requested commands. I will point o
To follow-up:
I installed 9.1-RELEASE last night, then went and cvsup'ed to the latest that
RELENG_9 would give me.
Everything is completely stock, I have not modified any config files other than
filling out the setup questions (hostname, em0 set to DHCP, added a base user
so I can ssh to it)
I was already starting to load up a fresh 9.1-STABLE box for other testing, I
will also create a stock box (no changes anywhere) and let it idle for a few
days to see if the problem is still there.
I'll report back either way in the next few days with results.
If I still have problems, I will
Hello,
I've updated the PR on this via bug track email (hopefully, it bounced my
first email) , but I thought I should bring it to the attention of the list as
it's still happening, and the original PR was from March 2012.
The PR is here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165903&cat=
de for the laggport do I have these problems.
How can I help Jack (or others) diagnose and test this further?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Forgeron
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 7:01 PM
To: free
I have a few systems with Intel X520-DA2 PCIe network cards (10 Gig).
The problem I've been running into is with a fresh 9.0-STABLE or 9.0-RELEASE
install. I can't get a LACP connection established over the ix0 and ix1 ports.
It's showing COLLECTING and DISTRIBUTING, but not ACTIVE.
I've notic
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Boris Kochergin
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:51 PM
To: Chris Forgeron
Cc: freebsd-stable
Subject: Re: ZFS - hot spares : automatic or not?
>After a cursory glance at their fault-management infrastructure, I
>noticed that it
Interesting, I was just testing Solaris 11 Express's ability to handle a pulled
drive today. It handles it quite well. However, my Areca 1880 drive (arcmsr0)
crashes when you reinsert the drive.. but that's another topic, and an issue
for Areca tech support..
..back to the point:
Solaris runs
>> On 6 January 2011 22:26, Chris Forgeron wrote:
>> > You know, these days I'm not as happy with SSD's for ZIL. I may blog about
>> > some of the speed results I've been getting over the last 6mo-1yr that
>> > I've been running them with Z
4 gig of memory for the cost of a 60 gig
SSD, and it will trounce the SSD for speed.
I'd put your SSD to L2ARC (cache).
-Original Message-
From: Damien Fleuriot [mailto:m...@my.gd]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:20 AM
To: Artem Belevich
Cc: Chris Forgeron; freebsd-stable@fre
essage-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Damien Fleuriot
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 5:55 PM
To: Chris Forgeron
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ZFS - moving from a zraid1 to zraid2 pool with 1.5tb disks
Well actually.
First off, raidz2 and raidz1 with copies=2 are not the same thing.
raidz2 will give you two copies of parity instead of just one. It also
guarantees that this parity is on different drives. You can sustain 2 drive
failures without data loss.
raidz1 with copies=2 will give you two copies of al
l: ch...@acsi.ca
2070 Oxford Street, Suite 100, Halifax NS B3L-2T2
Tel: 902-425-2686 Fax: 902-484-7909
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Forgeron
Sent: December-31-10 6:01 PM
To: freebsd-stable@freebs
BTW, I'm noticing the removal of vfs.zfs.zil_disable as well - It's not listed
as a sysctl when I check vfs.zfs, but I see it's still in the source code;
In usr/src/sys/cddl/ :
# grep -r zil_disable *
cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zil.h.orig:extern int
zil_disable;
cddl/contrib/
BTW, just passing on that my Dell T710 which would Kernel panic under
8.1-RELEASE randomly between 10 minutes-2 days, no longer does this under
8.1-STABLE. I was running it with 2 of the new Intel 6 core Xeon's - X5660
Under 8.1.-RELEASE FreeBSD didn't recognize the processor, and I guess that'
15 matches
Mail list logo
