Hey everyone!
This is not really an important issue, I just wanted to find out if anyone had
it on his or her radar.
I have a machine that isn't too powerful and hasn't got a lot of RAM either.
So as an experiment I wanted to compile the world with the option for
conserving space.
On 06.07.2011 01:00, George Kontostanos wrote:
[Promise PDC40718 SATA300 controller]
There are a lot of people I know that have similar issues. It has
caused me to replace 3 disks so far. I am afraid that this controller
should be marked as junk.
Do you have an alternative controller in
On 06.07.2011 01:00, George Kontostanos wrote:
There are a lot of people I know that have similar issues. It has
caused me to replace 3 disks so far. I am afraid that this controller
should be marked as junk.
Just go another crash. This one is different...
--- snip ---
dev = ad16p1.eli, ino
On 01.07.2011 12:18, Tom Evans wrote:
Hey guys! Thanks for all the answers!
I'm sorry, mine take a while. This server is my personal machine which I
work on in my spare time. As it seems, the last few weeks I was getting
very little time to spare. :-/
A serial console is easy enough to set up
On 18.06.2011 19:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
It may be that the kernel is panic'ing and auto-rebooting before he can
see the message in question. I would advocate he put the following
directives in his kernel configuration and rebuild/reinstall kernel and
wait for it to happen again.
I have
On 05.07.2011 17:48, George Kontostanos wrote:
I am not sure if it is the same controller:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=158268
Sure is. Here from my dmesg:
atapci1: Promise PDC40718 SATA300 controller port
0xdc00-0xdc7f,0xe000-0xe0ff mem
On 18.06.2011 18:49, Stefan Bethke wrote:
I have to slightly explain the word crash here: I don't actually
have to hard reset the system myself. My box just does a reboot by
itself. No filesystem is unmounted cleanly and because the machine
isn't really new and powerful fsck takes pretty
On 18.06.2011 19:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Hello Jeremy!
Thanks for your long answer! I'm sorry to have kept you waiting but I
was out of town and turned off all my computers while I was away.
It may be that the kernel is panic'ing and auto-rebooting before he can
see the message in
Hey everybody!
A while back I noticed strange system crashes on my personal file
server. At first I thought they were caused by bad connections. But
after exchanging all the SATA cables, the crashes didn't go away. Then I
started looking around the web.
As it seems there is a problem with
Hi there people!
I guess I really screwed up the rights within my source-tree (and maybe
share too). It all started pretty innocent. :-)
I wanted to encrypt /usr and /var, which are both mounted on dedicated
partions on this machine. There was still one unused partition, which I
will call (and
Kostik Belousov wrote:
BTW, The wired memory goes all over the place in this machine: even
when it's mostly idle it varies between 300 MB and 3.5 GB. That's why
I added 4 more GB.
3.5Gb wired ? Do you run amd64 ?
Does wired memory drops lower after you change the load ?
Either that or
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:28:02 +0100 Christian Baer wrote:
Greetings, people!
Never mind about this thing. Problem was solved. I must have had a mental
blackout today. Resetting the dhcp-leases did the trick.
Regards
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Greetings, people!
I had a strange effect today when I updated to the latest -STABLE (sources
from about 17:00 UTC yesterday, not sure about the time though). After
rebooting for the last time (installworld and mergemaster went before
that), the machine had a new IP. The old one was 192.168.100.9
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:01:48 +0100 (CET) Christian Baer wrote:
supplemental...
I'm having a few problems with Firefox here on this box. As you can see,
Thunderbird seems to work fine.
Ok, that was dumb. I was actually planning to write this with
Thunderbird, so you can't really see
Hello all!
I'm having a few problems with Firefox here on this box. As you can see,
Thunderbird seems to work fine. But Firfox just exits with segmentation
fault (Exit 139) - before anything is ever displayed.
Is this a known problem or do I have to go looking by myself?
I am currently running
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:09:18 +0200 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
The problem is that the Razer Copperhead registers itself as a mouse and
a keyboard. FreeBSD in connection with some mainboards seems to have
problems with that, but you can get a Firmware from Razer that removes
this behaviour.
Can you
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:10:12 -0400 Anish Mistry wrote:
Is there a ukbd in your dmesg? If there is, I'd suggest loading=20
kbdmux.
Yes there is - but only the darn mouse. Not sure if I need a keyboard
multiplexer, since I rather need to *ignore* this keyboard.
Currently there isn't support
Good evening, folks!
A few hours ago I installed FreeBSD on a new machine. This is the only
one I have with a USB-mouse attached (the stated Copperhead) - actually,
it's the only machine I have with any type of mouse attached. :-)
FreeBSD boots fine and also recognizes the mouse correctly:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:33:24 +1300 Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Not of much help to you I'm afraid :-( , but a couple of us see a very
similar error with the SX4060 (PDC20621) - same chip as the SX4000 which
works perfectly for Søren, so I'll be very interested to find out what
is going on with
I mounted ad8 as ro and tried to copy files off that drive. Didn't do
much good, the system still hung up. Because of the -ro I thought it
might be possible to shutdown the system cleanly, but that didn't work
this time either. During shutdown the fushing of the cache fails.
Strangely, this time
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:12:39 + (GMT) Gavin Atkinson wrote:
I'm not sure it was ever 'e'. I'm also confused by what you mean by
dd-mode - the footnote suggests you're talking about dangerously
dedicated mode, but the fact you created a slice and have s1 in all of
your device names
Good morning, everyone!
There seems to have been some changes made concerning the supported
Promise controllers.
I have a SATA TX2Plus (PDC20775 chip). This is a sort of hybrid for SATA
and PATA - it can run two drives of both.
Until today I got this running with a sort of hack I found here:
Hello *!
I am experiencing a very annoying problem when trying to (re-) install
hard drives. This problem has already been described in *.questions and
in two newsgroups (German and English) but sofar I got no response at
all. Now I think it might be because of a change in policy or even a bug.
23 matches
Mail list logo