Re: Missing 12 MFCs

2019-09-26 Thread David Cross
r352752, r352754 <3 Awesome, thank you!! On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:17 PM Ed Maste wrote: > On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 18:30, David Cross wrote: > > > > There are a set of commits in head that have not been pulled into the > > stable/12 branch. Many of these are marked a

Missing 12 MFCs

2019-09-19 Thread David Cross
There are a set of commits in head that have not been pulled into the stable/12 branch. Many of these are marked as MFC (and are quite old). It would be fantastic if they made it into 12.1. All of these I am currently running against 12.0-RELEASE across multiple environments (i386, amd64

Re: Reproducable panic in FFS with softupdates and no journaling (10.3-RELEASE-pLATEST) FOUND IT, including reproduction steps

2016-07-08 Thread David Cross
Ok... I found it. All of the writes go through ffs_write (including VOP_RECLAIM, so my statement that VOP_RECLAIM couldn't handle things that vinvalbuf left behind is obviously incorrect). Sometimes it worked, sometimes it paniced, I started putting more deugging into it and I noticed the

Re: Reproducable panic in FFS with softupdates and no journaling (10.3-RELEASE-pLATEST)

2016-07-07 Thread David Cross
r dependency lists.. I am not sure where those are under all of this.. bo_*? On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:21:20PM -0400, David Cross wrote: > > (kgdb) up 5 > > #5 0x80

Re: Reproducable panic in FFS with softupdates and no journaling (10.3-RELEASE-pLATEST)

2016-07-06 Thread David Cross
at 12:02:00PM -0400, David Cross wrote: > > Oh, whoops; how do I printout the buffer? > > In kgdb, p/x *(struct buf *)address > ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe

Re: Reproducable panic in FFS with softupdates and no journaling (10.3-RELEASE-pLATEST)

2016-07-06 Thread David Cross
Oh, whoops; how do I printout the buffer? On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:30 AM, David Cross <dcrosst...@gmail.com> wrote: > No kernel messages before (if there were I would have written this off a > long time ago); > And as of right now, this is probably the most fsck-ed filesystem

Re: Reproducable panic in FFS with softupdates and no journaling (10.3-RELEASE-pLATEST)

2016-07-06 Thread David Cross
tself On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 10:51:28AM -0400, David Cross wrote: > > Ok.. to reply to my own message, I using ktr and debugging printfs I have > > found the culprit.. but I am still a

Re: Reproducable panic in FFS with softupdates and no journaling (10.3-RELEASE-pLATEST)

2016-07-06 Thread David Cross
portion of the kernel and some pointers would be helpful. On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 2:31 PM, David Cross <dcrosst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, I have been trying to trace this down for awhile..I know quite a bit > about it.. but there's a lot I don't know, or I would have a patch. I have >

Reproducable panic in FFS with softupdates and no journaling (10.3-RELEASE-pLATEST)

2016-07-02 Thread David Cross
Ok, I have been trying to trace this down for awhile..I know quite a bit about it.. but there's a lot I don't know, or I would have a patch. I have been trying to solve this on my own, but bringing in some outside assistance will let me move on with my life. First up: The stacktrace (from a

kern/207069 update with patch

2016-02-23 Thread David Cross
I finally got my way through forth and to the point where I have a working patch; updated ticket with patch and included the testing I had completed. 2 line patch, should be very straightforward to someone familiar with that code. Thanks ___

Outstanding bugs in 10.3-BETA2

2016-02-19 Thread David Cross
Could we get re's comments on: kern/207069, kern/207070, kern/189219, and kern/206231 207069 is the major one for me, it means everytime I installworld I need to remember to re-edit loader.rc or my system will not boot; this is a major regression; this IS going to bite people in an existing

A few outstanding 10.3-BETA2 bugs

2016-02-18 Thread David Cross
I would like to call attention to a number of outstanding bugs with tickets, 2 of them have patches! 1) kern/189219 (ticket has proposed patch, much better than mine) which is a crasher when using dummyney on sparc64.. I've had to maintain a separate kernel patch for >6 months, there's really no