08.05.2021 2:52, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> i386 kernel uses memory up to 24G since 13.0.
>
> PAE only means that devices that can access full 64bit address are allowed
> to avoid dma bouncing.
Maybe you could tell something on similar topic?
There is FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE r369567 Base12 amd64
30.04.2021 14:30, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
> I installed dns/bind916 on my home server and configured it so it
> worked as both authoritative and recursor. Then I added
> 'nameserver 127.0.0.1' to /etc/resolv.conf and everything worked fine.
>
> But after updating OS from 12.2-RELEASE to
07.04.2021 12:49, Scott Bennett via freebsd-stable wrote:
> At least w.r.t. gvinum's raid5, I can attest that the kernel panics
> are real. Before settling on ZFS raidz2 for my largest storage pool, I
> experimented with gstripe(8), gmirror(8), graid3(8), and graid5(8) (from
>
06.04.2021 15:37, aventa...@fastmail.fm wrote:
> Deprecating base system ftpd does seem to be a good idea, especially for
> FreeBSD users wanting to use their computer
> as a workstation/desktop instead of as a server. I think the argument
> becomes, "who is our target audience?"
> If the
05.04.2021 19:57, Alan Somers write:
> I wouldn't say that anything is "very good" when it has no test suite
> whatsoever.
Many years of employment of ftpd in different environments (sometimes under
heavy load) means something, too.
Maybe even more than synthetic tests.
06.04.2021 1:27, Roger Leigh wrote:
>>> I propose deprecating the ftpd currently included in the base system
>>> before FreeBSD 14, and opened review D26447
>>> (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26447) to add a notice to the man page.
>>> I had originally planned to try to do this before 13.0, but it
On 05.04.2021 06:25, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> Eugene mentioned the convenience of ftpd in the same sentence as ipsec.
> I'm willing to bet those systems have ports installed too.
Ports/packages are great but they are not replacement for solid operating system
with bundled software tested and
04.04.2021 5:09, Karl Dunn wrote:
>> See if the BIOS offers a choice of configuring the controller as SATA
>> instead of RAID. That worked for me on an Inspiron 1180. (It also made W10
>> unbootable - apparently each OS occupies its own universe.)
>
> That worked, precisely as it did for you:
04.04.2021 3:39, Ed Maste wrote:
> I propose deprecating the ftpd currently included in the base system
> before FreeBSD 14, and opened review D26447
> (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26447) to add a notice to the man page.
> I had originally planned to try to do this before 13.0, but it dropped
>
17.02.2021 10:40, Jack L. wrote:
> I've noticed for Dells, you have to set the performance setting to
> "Custom" and OS Control to be able to change the EST.
I've already tried numerous variants of BIOS setting including "Maximum
Performance"
and "Custom" and still, ACPI BIOS does not export
Hi!
We use leased server Dell PowerEdge R640 with latest firmware (BIOS/UEFI)
that does not export ACPI _PSS table, so FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE/amd64 (GENERIC)
est(4) driver does not attach:
est0: numa-domain 0 on cpu0
est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized.
est: cpu_vendor
11.02.2021 6:26, Pete French wrote:
> I have a machine runnign 12-STABLE, which gets its upstream IP address from
> my ISP using DHCP over a cable modem. What I just tried to do was to set the
> MAC address on that interface at boot time, but if I do that then it no
> longer acquires a DHCP
14.01.2021 8:16, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> all my make commands run as time make ...
>
> I just got this result compiling scribus:
>
> 5m19.94s real 1h15m31.76s user5m20.87s sys
>
> I do not know how long it really took but 1h seems far to high. It
> really
15.09.2020 9:42, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> I tried that on my workstation (dual Xeon, lots of RAM) but couldn't get
>> it to compile for i586 - various things kept bailing out.
Note that I use multiple WITHOUT_XXX knobs documented in src.conf(5) to
decrease both
build time and size
14.09.2020 12:08, Charles Lecklider via freebsd-stable wrote:
> On 2020-09-14 04:41, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> Build time for modern FreeBSD version is too gross and needs way too much
>> memory,
>> so I stopped building image for my i586 hardware "in place" qui
14.09.2020 4:30, Charles Lecklider via freebsd-stable wrote:
> On 2020-09-01 03:20, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> CPU: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS (499.91-MHz 586-class CPU)
>> Origin="AuthenticAMD" Id=0x5a2 Family=0x5 Model=0xa Stepping=2
>> Feat
09.09.2020 19:29, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> I'm using sort of FreeBSD ZFS appliance with custom API, and I'm suffering
> from huge timeouts when large (dozens, actually) of concurrent zfs/zpool
> commands are issued (get/create/destroy/snapshot/clone mostly).
>
> Are there any tunables that
01.09.2020 15:23, Andy Farkas wrote:
> Just still wondering what 'assfail' could be.
Short for "assertion fail". Blame ZFS developers.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
01.09.2020 8:35, Andy Farkas wrote:
> My normally very reliable PC now panics in 'assfail+0x1d'
> Any idea why (or what!) this is?
> Imge of panic screen: https://imgur.com/1vRpkgW
You should describe your system: OS version and disk/file system setup,
because the screenshot shows ZFS-related
01.09.2020 6:50, Charles Lecklider via freebsd-stable wrote:
> On 2020-08-31 21:51, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
>> Given that the hardware notes
>> https://www.freebsd.org/releases/11.4R/hardware.html#proc-i386
>> explicitely claim 80486 compatibility, I'd guess this was not a
>> consciuous
01.09.2020 1:00, Charles Lecklider via freebsd-stable wrote:
> Having just trashed my dual Pentium 233 MMX by installing 11.4 I went
> digging to find the cause - and I found it.
>
> As you can see from objdump below, clearly a decision was made that 11.4
> would no longer support anything
29.08.2020 1:59, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>> spkr works just fine in my stable/11 systems. I use it for routers on modern
>> fanless hardware
>> to audio signalling like successfull completition of reboot (going to
>> multi-user mode).
>
> Is this what pfsense/opnsense uses for the “booting
28.08.2020 23:25, Warner Losh wrote:
> I'd like to retire the spkr driver. It was a cute hack before sound cards
> were ubiquitous, but it's not been kept up to date, and it's not clear that
> it still works It is still Giant locked, and though it's not a huge
> effort to do the locking I
14.08.2020 17:46, Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
> Then the question is whether I need openssl libraries from ports, when I
> use that for all ports with DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl due to QT5
> requirements?
>
> If I want to link with openssl from ports, it looks like I anyway need
>
11.08.2020 20:49, Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
> I have since long compiled sendmail in base with SASL using a src.conf
> like this:
>
> # sendmail with SASL required for outgoing SMTP AUTH, see:
> # https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/SMTP-Auth.html
> # depends on port security/cyrus-sasl2
>
27.07.2020 5:16, Joe Clarke wrote:
> About two weeks ago, I upgraded from the latest 11-stable to the latest
> 12-stable. After that, I periodically see the network throughput come to a
> near standstill. This FreeBSD machine is an ESXi VM with two interfaces. It
> acts as a router. It
22.07.2020 20:02, mike tancsa wrote:
>
> On 7/22/2020 1:29 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> 22.07.2020 2:37, mike tancsa wrote:
>>
>>>> Something else special about the setup.
>>>> output of "top -b"
>>>>
>>> ports are right
22.07.2020 2:37, mike tancsa wrote:
>> Something else special about the setup.
>> output of "top -b"
>>
>
> ports are right now being built in a VM, but the problem (zrepl hanging)
> and zfs list -t snapshots taking forever happens regardless
>
> PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES
19.07.2020 21:17, mike tancsa wrote:
> Are there any tweaks that can be done to speed up or improve zfs
> metadata performance ? I have a backup server with a lot of snapshots
> (40,000) and just doing a listing can take a great deal of time. Best
> case scenario is about 24 seconds, worst case,
26.06.2020 1:30, Donald Wilde wrote:
> Here's 'pstat -s' on the i3 (which registers as cpu HAMMER):
>
> Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity
> /dev/ada0s1b 335544320 33554432 0%
> /dev/ada0s1d 335544320 33554432 0%
> Total67108864
25.06.2020 18:42, Donald Wilde wrote:
> Thanks, Kevin! My laptop's BIOS is old enough that it balked when I
> tried to boot from a GPT setup of 12.1R. One Of These Days I'll fix
> that but the MBR works and I needed to move on.
>
> We'll get there! :D
gpart is not for GPT, it is for "GEOM
22.06.2020 21:56, Andrea Brancatelli via freebsd-stable wrote:
> I have an old 10.3 machine with sendmail 8.15.2 that's been working ok
> for a long time.
>
> We have a simple mailterable rule that looks like:
>
> schema31.itdbmail-lmtpd[10.33.whatever]
>
> That we use to forward mail
22.06.2020 3:56, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> One of the upstream problems is that there is not really any
> authoritative performance regression log being built up, so it is hard
> to see where such regressions were introduced. Somebody then has to
> spend a lot of time tracking down each and every
15.06.2020 18:10, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> I am running FreeBSD 11.3. Whenever I inserted some 20 year old CD (backups
> on CD-R) which is currently unreadable the system is trying to read the CD
> even after I want to eject it by button in the CD drive or "eject" command.
>
> These messages
14.06.2020 12:21, Donald Wilde wrote:
> Since I am using this mule as a dev system for a server-based
> application, I have no WM or GUI activated. I really would like to
> have the virtual consoles back, and I will gladly learn from what I
> did to mess it up. :D
Can you boot it with
21.05.2020 8:23, Donald Wilde wrote:
> The installation -- whole disk, AUTO, GPT, all options selected --
> downloads everything and appears to match all checksums and complete
> successfully but when I reboot, it goes immediately into the PXE boot,
> failing with no DHCP success. I've tried both
27.05.2020 22:11, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I have a ZFS dataset about 10T of actual size (may be more) that I need to
> send over a very laggy connection. So I'm sending it from the shell-script
> that reattempts to send it after a short timeout, retrieving the send token
>
16.05.2020 16:51, Thomas Zander via freebsd-stable wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can the following be done these days?
> - Encrypted ZFS root pool on RAID-Z
> - Supply the key for the encrypted root pool during boot via USB thumb drive
> - No keyboard is attached to the machine
> - No /boot on the thumb
Hi!
It seems that clang-6 supplied with 11.2 cannot build clang-9 in stable/11 for
i386,
so buildworld is broken. Details are here:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246274
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi!
It seems that clang-6 supplied with 11.2 cannot build clang-9 in stable/9 for
i386,
so buildworld is broken. Details are here:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246274
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
24.04.2020 11:26, Igor Pokrovsky пишет:
> Hello all,
>
> I haven’t been using FreeBSD since 8-STABLE times. Recently I tried to
> install latest 12-STABLE on my old computer.
> But even during initial boot up loader hangs. Eventually I was able to
> proceed with installation after replacing
16.04.2020 16:31, David Marec wrote:
> The manpage and usage output doesn't match.
>
> The manpage tells us that this option should be used alone on the command
> line, as any other command will be discarded.
>
> The usage ouput does not mention the "-r" flag but "cmr" (with a typo).
>
> Both
12.04.2020 23:30, Stefan Bethke пишет:
> Am 12.04.2020 um 18:29 schrieb Eugene Grosbein <mailto:eu...@grosbein.net>>:
>>
>> 12.04.2020 21:57, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>
>>>>> Is there a way, ideally in the loader, to tell the kernel to ignore ada1
>&g
12.04.2020 21:57, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>> Is there a way, ideally in the loader, to tell the kernel to ignore ada1
>>> and/or ahcich5? Or can I force ZFS some other way to ignore the disk? I do
>>> have a spare disk I can use to replace the failed one, but I can't get the
>>> machine into a
12.04.2020 21:37, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> I have a server I don't have physical access to right now, which has a broken
> SATA disk that produces mostly errors (but not entirely).
>
> The disk has two partitions that are part of a zpool each. I can't bring the
> system up with this disk being
12.04.2020 11:41, Chris wrote:
> Sorry for the ling title. But wasn't sure how make my
> question more concise.
> Why did we begin making an initial console "graphics mode"
> by default. My understanding has always been that (Free)BSD
> has been a "Server by default", and a Desktop after an
12.04.2020 2:25, Chris Ross пишет:
>
>> On Apr 11, 2020, at 14:33, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>
>> 12.04.2020 0:36, Chris Ross wrote:
>>
>>> I have a FreeBSD 11.3-STABLE server that is my router, using a ZFS mirror
>>> (of two GPT disks) as it’s
12.04.2020 0:36, Chris Ross wrote:
> I have a FreeBSD 11.3-STABLE server that is my router, using a ZFS mirror (of
> two GPT disks) as it’s disk. It’s many years old, and has only been
> misbehaving like this for a day or so. I’m trying to figure out what’s wrong.
>
> I confirmed that
29.03.2020 1:53, Andrea Brancatelli via freebsd-stable wrote:
> If anyone is interested please feel free to contact me otherwise I'll
> just delete it :-)
What is most recent version of FreeBSD that has this problem with bsnmpd
crashing?
Please rebuild bsnmpd with debugging enabled, if you
21.03.2020 6:41, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> [ This is cross-posted across several mailing lists for maximum visibility.
> Please respect reply-to and keep replies to x...@freebsd.org . Thank you! ]
>
> In order to improve support when using evdev to manage input devices, in
> particular
25.02.2020 4:37, Minoru TANABE wrote:
CC'ing to author of mentioned revision.
> Hi, all.
> I'm 12-stable user.
> My system upgrade from 12.1-stable_r357351(2020-02-01) to
> r358294(2020-02-24).
> After upgrading, I can't input '\', '|', '_' symbol.
>
> I use vt console driver and
23.02.2020 3:01, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that STABLE and CURRENT have base subversion at version 1.10.0.
>
> Why is base svn not updated to last LTS 1.10.6?
You are supposed to install /usr/ports/devel/subversion (1.13.0 at the moment)
for any usage other than updating
19.12.2019 11:21, George Michaelson wrote:
> I tried an install on a new Dell 740, which has dual M2 256GB internal
> SSD on a "Boss" controller. It exposes as AHCI.
>
> It wouldn't recognize these as installable drives as raw devices. If
> you use the Boss to define a virtual drive in RAID-1 it
10.12.2019 23:08, Mark Martinec пишет:
> 2019-12-10 16:35, Marc Branchaud wrote:
>
>> On 2019-12-10 9:18 a.m., Mark Martinec wrote:
>>> Commenting on a thread from 2018-12 and from 2019-09-20, with my solution
>>> to the boot problem at the end, in case anyone is still interested.
>>
>> Thank you
07.12.2019 7:22, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Adding port maintainer to CC:
>> Yes. It works. Thank you very much.
>>
>> I delete manual copied file.
>> I install ports via portsnap.
>> I fetch srcs from ftp.
>> And install ng_ipacct from ports.
>> And optio
07.12.2019 6:03, Eugene Kazarinov wrote:
> Yes. It works. Thank you very much.
>
> I delete manual copied file.
> I install ports via portsnap.
> I fetch srcs from ftp.
> And install ng_ipacct from ports.
> And option VIMAGE in port ng_ipacct was disabled. I dont know why.
> option VIMAGE in
07.12.2019 0:49, Eugene Kazarinov wrote:
> pkg install ng_ipacct install ng_ipacct.ko in /boot/modules/ and it
> doesnt start
>
> if I copy ng_ipacct.ko to /boot/kernel/ it didnt start with error:
> link_elf_obj: symbol tcbinfo undefined
> linker_load_file: /boot/kernel/ng_ipacct.ko -
02.12.2019 20:35, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 02/12/2019 11:27, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> The vast majority of my "destroy" operations are for snapshots, but what
>> I have seen is that, without the "-d", the command does not return until the
>> disk activity of the "destroy" finishes, but with
30.11.2019 0:57, Scott Bennett wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 23:18:37 +0700 Eugene Grosbein
> wrote:
>
>> 28.11.2019 20:34, Steven Hartland wrote:
>>
>>> It may well depend on the extent of the deletes occurring.
>>>
>>> Have you tried
30.11.2019 15:48, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have RAIDZ1 with five GELI-encrypted SSDs da[2-6].eli (non-boot pool).
>
> I've exported the pool, destroyed da2.eli then successfully imported pool
> back in degraded state.
> Then I've mounted some file systems succe
Hi!
I have RAIDZ1 with five GELI-encrypted SSDs da[2-6].eli (non-boot pool).
I've exported the pool, destroyed da2.eli then successfully imported pool back
in degraded state.
Then I've mounted some file systems successfully but zfs mount for next one
hung on [tx->tx_sync_done_cv]
for 4400
28.11.2019 20:34, Steven Hartland wrote:
> It may well depend on the extent of the deletes occurring.
>
> Have you tried disabling TRIM to see if it eliminates the delay?
This system used mfi(4) first and mfi(4) does not support TRIM at all.
Performance was abysmal.
Now it uses mrsas(4) and
28.11.2019 14:26, Steven Hartland wrote:
> As you mentioned it’s on SSD you could be suffering from poor TRIM
> performance from your devices
> if you run gstat -pd you’ll be able to get an indication if this is the case.
Yes, this box does have problems with poor TRIM performance.
But isn't
28.11.2019 16:38, Pete French wrote:
> On 28/Nov/2019 07:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> 28.11.2019 13:46, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Is it normal that "zfs destroy" for one ZVOL with attribute "used" equal to
28.11.2019 13:46, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it normal that "zfs destroy" for one ZVOL with attribute "used" equal to
> 2112939808 bytes (~2GB)
> takes over two minutes waiting on "tx_sync_done_cv"? The pool is RAID1 over
> five SSDs enc
Hi!
Is it normal that "zfs destroy" for one ZVOL with attribute "used" equal to
2112939808 bytes (~2GB)
takes over two minutes waiting on "tx_sync_done_cv"? The pool is RAID1 over
five SSDs encrypted with GELI
having ZIL and Cache on distinct unencrypted SSD.
11.3-STABLE/amd64 r354667. System
21.11.2019 18:35, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> How do I get boot messages generated by loader itself written to some log
>> after successfull boot?
>> This is generic BIOS-based 11.3-STABLE/amd64 system with syscons console
>> driver.
>>
>> /var/run/dmesg.boot starts with kernel messages without
21.11.2019 17:22, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2019, at 9:51, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> How do I get boot messages generated by loader itself written to some log
>> after successfull boot?
>> This is generic BIOS-based 11.3-STABLE/amd64 sy
Hi!
How do I get boot messages generated by loader itself written to some log after
successfull boot?
This is generic BIOS-based 11.3-STABLE/amd64 system with syscons console driver.
/var/run/dmesg.boot starts with kernel messages without previous lines from the
loader.
Specifically, I need
20.11.2019 16:47, Ronald Klop wrote:
> Thanks for all the advice. I am indeed looking for using jail from the
> non-root user in the host. Jailme sounds like a good solution.
>
> My use case is providing a relatively save way of giving a user the
> possibility to experiment with root rights
18.11.2019 19:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Please point me to right direction for debugging this.
Is it normal that over 1/3rd of 360G total physical RAM is in "Laundry"
category in addition to 173G Wired?
last pid: 20372; load averages: 8.04, 7.73, 7.84
After 2 days of uptime there is a guest that should have only 2GB of RAM but
uses nearly 22G "extra":
# ps -o vsz,rss,command | grep sfile01
29234040 24851428 bhyve: sfile01 (bhyve)
# bhyvectl --vm=sfile01 --get-all | grep -B1 -A1 mem
ID Length Name
0 2048MB sysmem
1 2048KB
16.11.2019 6:24, Xin LI wrote:
> There are several leaks fixed recently, but not all of them were merged back
> to stable/11 (e.g. r341705 which may or may not be related to your issue).
It seems that fix deals with virtio-scsi but all guest systems use virtio-net
and ahci-hd here.
16.11.2019 6:24, Xin LI wrote:
> There are several leaks fixed recently, but not all of them were merged back
> to stable/11 (e.g. r341705 which may or may not be related to your issue).
>
> Personally, I'd recommend updating to 12.x for new features as they are being
> actively developed and
15.11.2019 13:08, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Recently I did routine source upgrade from 11.2-STABLE/amd64 to 11.3-STABLE
> r354667
> that went without any problem. After less than 2 days of uptime it paniced
> and failed to reboot (hung),
> screenshot is here: ht
15.11.2019 13:08, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Recently I did routine source upgrade from 11.2-STABLE/amd64 to 11.3-STABLE
> r354667
> that went without any problem. After less than 2 days of uptime it paniced
> and failed to reboot (hung),
> screenshot is here: ht
Hi!
Recently I did routine source upgrade from 11.2-STABLE/amd64 to 11.3-STABLE
r354667
that went without any problem. After less than 2 days of uptime it paniced and
failed to reboot (hung),
screenshot is here: http://www.grosbein.net/freebsd/zpanic.png
It did not panic with 11.2-STABLE but
Hi!
After 1 day and 11 hours of host's uptime I observe significant leak of bhyve
instances RSS:
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIMEWCPU COMMAND
8 root 34 200 60320M 58866M kqread 21 62.0H 692.35% bhyve:
sappdev (bhyve)
5546 root 26 20
09.11.2019 19:45, Scott Bennett wrote:
> The rest of this message was posted a little while ago to the
> freebsd-questions list by mistake. It was intended for freebsd-stable,
> so I am posting it here now after posting a brief apology on the other
> list.
> I have had to waste a great
09.11.2019 19:45, Scott Bennett пишет:
> The rest of this message was posted a little while ago to the
> freebsd-questions list by mistake. It was intended for freebsd-stable,
> so I am posting it here now after posting a brief apology on the other
> list.
> I have had to waste a great
17.10.2019 12:37, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> just trying out 12,1 on a DELL PowerEdge R710, and I see:
> ...
> Oct 16 22:52:12 store-08 kernel: bce3: bce_pulse(): Warning: bootcode thinks
> driver is absent! (bc_state = 0x0023600E)
> Oct 16 22:52:13 store-08 kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response
11.10.2019 18:57, Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
>> Can you show the output of file /usr/bin/uname ?
>
> $ uname -aKU
> FreeBSD P142.sics.se 11.3-STABLE FreeBSD 11.3-STABLE #9 r353280: Mon Oct 7
> 22:16:02 CEST 2019 r...@p142.sics.se:/storage/obj/usr/src/sys/X250 amd64
> 1103500 1103500
>
> no
30.09.2019 3:11, Pete French wrote:
> Its a bit worrying to me that this can happen, especially in userland.
>
> Any opinions or things people would ike me to check ?
netstat -p tcp -ss
tcpdump -i $interface -npvs0 icmp or 'tcp[tcpflags] & (tcp-rst) != 0'
31.07.2019 22:30, mike tancsa wrote:
> While moving a pair of ZFS disks from an *very* old motherboard to a new
> one, I ran into an odd problem I had not seen before. The box was
> running just fine RELENG_10 from FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #18 r279918 on 10yr
> old MB. Boots normally and expected
CC'ing Alexander Motin who comitted the change.
20.07.2019 1:21, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> I recently upgraded several file servers from 11.2 to 11.3. All of
> them boot from a ZFS pool called "tank" (the data is in a different
> pool). In a couple of instances (which caused me to have to take
19.07.2019 3:13, Karl Denninger wrote:
> FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE #2 r349024M: Thu Jun 13 18:01:16 CDT 2019
> k...@newfs.denninger.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/KSD-SMP
>
> Note -- no patches of any sort in the ZFS code; I am NOT running any of
> my former patch set.
>
>
12.06.2019 12:17, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
>>> The Samba 4 ZFS is from https://wiki.freebsd.org/Samba4ZFS (which I wrote..)
You should correct this page and change the line for /etc/fstab
and use non-zero value for fsck pass number.
___
12.06.2019 12:17, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
>> Please show your /etc/fstab line for this UFS-inside-ZVOL and your changes
>> to rc.d/fsck.
>> Your logs do not show that fsck is started so I presume some mistake in the
>> /etc/fstab.
>> Maybe you forgot that it needs non-zero sixth field.
>
> The
12.06.2019 8:04, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a small UFS partition that is the sysvol for Samba 4 (otherwise it
> doesn't work due to ACL issues).
>
> I found that I usually have to manually fsck it on a bad reboot, even if I
> have fsck_y_enable so I added a hack to /etc/rc.d/fsck
01.06.2019 19:57, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 01.06.2019 19:04, Nenhum_de_Nos wrotr:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I replaced a faulty disk from a gmirror some time ago. The array had two
>> 1TB disks and I got one 2TB disk there. Now I replaced the second one and
>> tried to grow
01.06.2019 19:04, Nenhum_de_Nos wrotr:
> Hi,
>
> I replaced a faulty disk from a gmirror some time ago. The array had two
> 1TB disks and I got one 2TB disk there. Now I replaced the second one and
> tried to growfs it. No good for me.
First you need to resize the mirror itself with "gmirror
20.05.2019 9:14, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2019, 6:59 PM Paul Mather, wrote:
>
>> On May 19, 2019, at 9:46 PM, tech-lists wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> context is 12-stable, zfs, bhyve
>>>
>>> I have a zvol-backed bhyve guest. Its zvol size was initially 512GB
>>> It needed to be
08.05.2019 3:23, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
> I'm misunderstand what in my configuration can result core dumps a running
> daemon...
> I'm attached a sample racoon.conf. Can You check for possible problems?
> Also on one host I got a crash in another function:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x0024717f in
09.04.2019 7:00, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
>> My guess (given that only ada1 is reporting a blocksize mismatch) is that
>> your disks reported a 512B native blocksize. In the absence of any override,
>> ZFS will then build an ashift=9 pool.
[skip]
> smartctl 7.0 2018-12-30 r4883 [FreeBSD
26.03.2019 14:26, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> I have a FreeBSD 11.1 box with 2 public IPs that has two tunnels to another
> FreeBSD box with 1 public IP. One of these tunnels is working, the other
> isn't. Long story short: I have some experience in ipsec tunnels setup. and I
> supposed that
18.03.2019 17:22, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> That said, did anybody considered ignoring NO_VGA FACP flag on Silvermonts
> only ? Or even better, gather SMBIOS identifications for affected BIOSes
> and ignore the flag for them ?
Is SMBIOS-bases blacklisting reliable considering future BIOS
18.03.2019 0:34, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Can anybody provide an example of machine where the flag is set but VGA
> works ? For me, it is set on headless NUC when there is no monitor
> attached, and then BIOS does not configure framebuffer at all.
17.03.2019 21:58, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Huh? A simple *filesystem copy* managed to force a 16Gb system into
> requiring page file backing store?
>
> I was able to complete the copy by temporarily adding the swap space
> back on (where it would be when the move was complete) but that
>
Hi!
Since 11.2-RELESE, default console driver vt(4) checks ACPI table for presence
of VGA in the system.
It does not initialize console (no input, no output) if ACPI states there is no
VGA adapter.
There are PRs describing many cases when VGA is present but ACPI lies
and we have a regression
28.02.2019 23:18, Lee Damon wrote:
> I have three old FBSD 10 boxes that I need to upgrade. Ordinarily I do this
> by building a new box with the latest OS then migrating services and data.
> Unfortunately I don't have that option this time, the upgrade has to happen
> in-place. My plan is to
1 - 100 of 587 matches
Mail list logo
