Hi,
Sorry for crossposting, but this would be really nice to be fixed in
the final release. I just installed one RC2 onto a XenServer 6.1 cluster
but cannot boot with XENHVM kernel. I started a thread on the
freebsd-xen list, which is here:
Dear All,
In the weekend I tried to compile a custom AMD64 8.3 kernel. It started
as a normal buildworld + buildkernel update from 8.3 and it turned out
that without the FREEBSD_COMPAT6 and maybe LIB32 kernel config option
the system won't boot into multiuser. It was mount and something else
Hi,
I had a hard time booting FreeBSD 8.2 on an IBM X3550M3 which is also
an UEFI maniac one. I could only boot FreeBSD from an USB DVD and
install it from there. Maybe some legacy fallback boot options are
availabe for this mobo. I think they have its user manual on their
website.
Dear List,
Does the RELEASE_8.2 or RELENG_8 needs the CVE-2012-2110 fix for
openssl?
Best,
Andras
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hi,
Could you try FreeBSD it on a machine with a chipset like this?
Regards,
Andras
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:40:50 -0400 (EDT), Andy Dills wrote:
Hi there,
Does anybody know if there are plans to support the Intel c602
chipset any
time soon?
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
Hi,
Did you check whether there's newer firmware for the microcloud
mainboards? Does the integrated ctrls are in AHCI mode in the BIOS?
You may also ask Supermicro if it turns out that it's not a FreeBSD
problem, but be prepared that they'll ask for enterprise drives first.
Regards,
Andras
Hi,
And another question, have you tried with other type and vendor of
disks? We saw some strange behavior with specific disks hanged onto a
specific ctrl, but that was with Linux. :)
Andras
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:10:34 +0400 (MSK), Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Dear colleagues,
I've start
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:19:54 +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
Hello All,
I'm unable to complete upgrading 9.0-CURRENT to 9.0-RELEASE from
sources.
'make installworld' fails on installing chpass:
[...]
=== usr.bin/chpass (install)
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 4555 chpass /usr/bin
install -o
Hello,
Currently I'm facing a wierd problem. I should have an environment in a
jail where a PHP script (with pecl-gnupg) is able to sign messages with
PGP. However it turned out, that PGP needs a tty in the jail, which is
available if I use tmux or ssh login to the jail and signing from shell
Hi,
8.3 is on the way IMHO, but anyway RELENG_8 will be supported until
2013 febr 24, by the current status.
Regards,
Andras
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:23:40 -, Steven Hartland wrote:
Currently http://www.freebsd.org/security/ states 8.2
is Estimated EoL July 31, 2012.
Given 9.0 has only
Hi,
You can easily set up FTPS with pure-ftpd, but AFAIK only the
authentication will be secured. This is also called FTP-TLS.
Regards,
Andras
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 06:47:38 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
Not SFTP (which is supported by the sshd) but FTPS is it
supported
by FreeBSD?
This
It would be also nice to see whether compiling the kernel and the world
for the specific machine counts. I think it's an advantage of FreeBSD,
but never could do a benchmark comparing this.
Andras
15.12.2011 12:19 napján Michael Larabel ezt írta:
On 12/15/2011 05:02 AM, Steven Hartland
Dear All,
To anyone who plan to use the machine in the subject and interested in
'what's in box' I made some printout saves. Actually my last FreeBSD
install was a FreeBSD 6.1 (6.2 now, and has a nice 790 days of uptime)
on an Intel branded server.
Printouts from IBM X3550 M3:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:07:04 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 10/31/11 12:04 AM, Gót András wrote:
Dear All,
I'd like to have the following ruleset, for pure-ftpd passive port
range:
(pasv and past mistyping corrected)
---
ftp_pasv_start=X
ftp_pasv_end=Y
rdr on $netif inet proto tcp from
Dear All,
I'd like to have the following ruleset, for pure-ftpd passive port
range:
---
ftp_pasv_start=X
ftp_past_end=Y
rdr on $netif inet proto tcp from any to $internalip port
$ftp_pasv_start:$ftp_past_end - $internalip
pass in quick on $netif proto tcp from any to $internalip port
Dear All,
I'd like to have the following ruleset, for pure-ftpd passive port
range:
(pasv and past mistyping corrected)
---
ftp_pasv_start=X
ftp_pasv_end=Y
rdr on $netif inet proto tcp from any to $internalip port
$ftp_pasv_start:$ftp_pasv_end - $internalip
pass in quick on $netif proto
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:53:09 +0200, geoffroy desvernay wrote:
On 13/09/2011 13:22, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Maciej Jan Broniarz schreef:
Wiadomość napisana przez Jeremy Chadwick w dniu 13 wrz 2011, o
godz.
12:33:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:43:29AM +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz
wrote:
I'm having
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:39:50 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 07:15:26AM +0200, G??t Andr??s wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:16:54 -0700, Xin LI wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:45 PM, G??t Andr??s and...@antiszoc.hu
wrote:
Dear All,
I'd like to install FreeBSD onto az IBM
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:03:05 +0200, Gót András wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:39:50 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 07:15:26AM +0200, G??t Andr??s wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:16:54 -0700, Xin LI wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:45 PM, G??t Andr??s and...@antiszoc.hu
Dear All,
I'd like to install FreeBSD onto az IBM X3550 M3 which looks like UEFI
only. Is it possible to have FreeBSD amd64 get working on it or should I
forget it? :(
Regards,
Andras
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:16:54 -0700, Xin LI wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Gót András and...@antiszoc.hu
wrote:
Dear All,
I'd like to install FreeBSD onto az IBM X3550 M3 which looks like
UEFI only.
Is it possible to have FreeBSD amd64 get working on it or should I
forget
Hi,
What type of card is this? We've just ordered an IBM x3550m3, that also
LSI based RAID IMHO.
Are you sure that all disks and connections are OK?
Andras
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:43:29 +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some trouble with LSI MegaRAID on FreeBSD
Hi,
I think it's enough to have 2 parity drives with raidz2. If a drive fails
another two has to fail for data loss. However, keep in mind that raid (in
any form) is not instead of backups.
I have a setup where a 8TB RAID5 is the main backup and serves as file
server for not important things AND
On Hét, Február 15, 2010 9:39 pm, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org
wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After
On Hét, Február 15, 2010 10:15 pm, Dan Naumov wrote:
A C2Q CPU makes little sense right now from a performance POV. For
the price of that C2Q CPU + LGA775 board you can get an i5 750 CPU and
a 1156 socket motherboard that will run circles around that C2Q. You
would lose the ECC though, since
On Sze, Február 10, 2010 11:55 am, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:27:53AM +0100, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 05:28:57 Dan Langille wrote:
Boris Kochergin wrote:
Peter C. Lai wrote:
On 2010-02-09 06:37:47AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
Charles
Hi,
Do you have any news about 8.1? :)
Regards,
Andras
On Csü, Január 7, 2010 2:54 am, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
DĹ#65533;a 7.1.2010 2:21, Oliver Pinter wrote / napĂsal(a):
and who is 7.3 ;)
ah, good catch, of course I meant FreeBSD 7.3. Sorry for that. My mind
just got a little confused
On Pén, Július 31, 2009 2:06 pm, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess 6.4 - 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ??
It is already fixed.
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195987
On Pén, Július 31, 2009 4:44 pm, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
helge.old...@atosorigin.com wrote:
Willem,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote on Friday, July 31, 2009 2:07 PM:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
With a 6.4 of last night
So I guess
Hi,
From 6.2 it's part of the main kernel. As I know IPMI works fine on
X2100M2 machines. On these you've to forget the ipmi console, because once
bge(4) loads it blocks the bridge that the ipmi uses for remote console.
There was a patch for an older bge(4) driver, but on the 6.2 i couldn't
patch
On Hét, Augusztus 6, 2007 10:03 am, Nicolas Szalay wrote:
Le lundi 06 aoĂťt 2007 Ă 09:40 +0200, GĂłt AndrĂĄs a ĂŠcrit :
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
From 6.2 it's part of the main kernel. As I know IPMI works fine on
X2100M2 machines. On these you've to forget the ipmi console, because
once bge(4)
Hi,
So. The simple question is: Why FreeBSD has securelevel 0 if init sets it
to 1, if it sees at boot that the level is 0? :) It's OK that it's in the
manual, but there are two default ways to set securelevel at boot time
also. I don't really get the point of this forced 0 to 1 changing.
We'd
On Sze, Április 4, 2007 3:21 pm, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We're using gmirror on our sun fire x2100 and FreeBSD 6.1-p10. Some
days ago I found this in the logs:
Apr 1 02:12:05 x2100 kernel: ad6: WARNING - WRITE_DMA48 UDMA ICRC
error (retrying request)
33 matches
Mail list logo
