On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Brett Glass wrote:
Have been following the thread related to SU+J, and am wondering: why is it
considered to be undesirable on SSDs (assuming that they have good wear
leveling)? I have been enabling it on systems with SSDs, hoping that between
the lack of rotating media and
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Karl Denninger wrote:
On 11/3/2012 5:25 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Brett Glass wrote:
Have been following the thread related to SU+J, and
am wondering: why is it
considered to be undesirable on SSDs (assuming
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 17:06 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
Have been following the thread related to SU+J, and am wondering: why is it
considered to be undesirable on SSDs (assuming that
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Christopher Sean Hilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Those machines work very well with both FreeBSD 6 and 7.
If you install FreeBSD 7, remember to enable ULE instead
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Michael wrote:
Hello, i know that you are working on freebsd scheduler, probably this
bug have relation to your work:
After upgrading to Freebsd 7 (from RELENG_6), postgresql coredumps several
times per day. I asked mail list pgsql-bugs and got answer that this
is probably
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I know that RELENG_7 is not considered very near-release, but I thought I'd
give my 2¢ in the hope that I might have a little influence on the
scheduler
development to my benefit.
The switch from RELENG_6 to RELENG_7 went
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I know that RELENG_7 is not considered very near-release, but I
thought I'd
give my 2¢ in the hope that I might have a little influence on the
scheduler
development
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Josh Carroll wrote:
Not to say that any problems that might have developed with SCHED_4BSD
should not be fixed, but you should give SCHED_ULE a try since it brings
benefits even for single CPU systems (e.g. better interactive response).
For my particular work load, 4BSD
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 03:41:55PM -0800, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I plan to MFC all of this lovely stuff for 6.1:
http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/vfsmfc.diff
I'm looking for people who are willing to patch their stable boxes and
test
I plan to MFC all of this lovely stuff for 6.1:
http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/vfsmfc.diff
I'm looking for people who are willing to patch their stable boxes and
test this. This has the following changes in it:
1) Improved debugging with DEBUG_LOCKS via the new stack(9) api.
2)
I'm not able to reproduce the quota deadlocks that were reported. Can
anyone reproduce them on 7.0? I need more specific instructions on how to
reproduce, or more detailed debugging info from someone who can. If you
can reproduce, please add 'options DEBUG_LOCKS' to your kernel. Then get
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:36:23 +0100
From: Godwin Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:49:00 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fixed the build and merged this. Any stable users who can should test
this. I'm very confident in it, but more eyes and users are better.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:18:49AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I am going to MFC phk's filedesc
I am going to MFC phk's filedesc related work in the next few days. This
is required if I am ever to merge the vfs smp changes. I have a patch
available at:
http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/fdesc.patch
I'd appreciate it if anyone who can would test this. It has been running
on current for
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:18:49AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I am going to MFC phk's filedesc related work in the next few days. This
is required if I am ever to merge the vfs smp changes. I have a patch
available at:
http
15 matches
Mail list logo
