Re: 50% of packets lost only on local interfaces

2005-02-07 Thread Jos M. Fandio
José M. Fandiño wrote: Chris wrote: Have tested on 3 boxes. yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't believe it but it happens. I ever thought it would be possible. Finally, I found the culprit: CFLAGS= \ 100% of the transmited traffic is received COPTFLAGS=

Re: 50% of packets lost only on local interfaces

2005-02-07 Thread Jos M. Fandio
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote: Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote: Chris wrote: Have tested on 3 boxes. yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't believe it but it happens. I ever thought it would be

Re: 50% of packets lost only on local interfaces

2005-02-01 Thread Jos M. Fandio
Chris wrote: Have tested on 3 boxes. yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't believe it but it happens. I ever thought it would be possible. The weirdest is that it worked in 5.3-RELEASE and some time later, whilst I was tracking -stable, aplications began to fail

50% of packets lost only on local interfaces

2005-01-31 Thread Jos M. Fandio
Hello, It sounds weird but tcp/ip traffic directed to _local_ interfaces, and only _local_ interfaces, always cause 50% of packets lost. Of course there isn't packet filters activated. I'm running -stable (the last update was this past weekend) There is another report like this: