without any problem, so I really do not understand why this part of the
drm code was not MFC'd into the RELENG_6 branch. Is there any reason for
doing so?
Thanks, Laci
- --
László Károly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Altaic StudiesEgyetem str. 2
Total1082279 2101
Laci
- --
László Károly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Altaic StudiesEgyetem str. 2.
University of Szeged H-6722 Szeged, Hungary
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/869D81C5
Fingerprint: 1E61 3205
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:03:30 -0800 Sam Leffler wrote:
László Károly wrote:
Boris Samorodov wrote:
I've had 6.0-STABLE as of jan-2006. Yesterday it was upgraded to
current 6.1-PRERELEASE (tag=RELENG_6). The hardware is HP
of debugging should I do to find up what's up?
Good question ;-): how to debug a system which practically does not
react but runs?
Thanks.
Me too.
- --
László Károly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Altaic StudiesEgyetem str. 2.
University of Szeged
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sam Leffler wrote:
László Károly wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hi!
I've had 6.0-STABLE as of jan-2006. Yesterday it was upgraded to
current 6.1-PRERELEASE (tag=RELENG_6). The hardware is HP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:03:30 -0800 Sam Leffler wrote:
László Károly wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boris Samorodov wrote:
I've had 6.0-STABLE as of jan-2006. Yesterday it was upgraded to
current
ID 3-00, 3 buttons
psm0: config:, flags:0008, packet size:4
psm0: syncmask:08, syncbits:00
Is there any solution for this problem?
Best, Laci
- --
László Károly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Altaic StudiesEgyetem str. 2.
University of Szeged
for solving this problem?
Thanks, Laci
- --
László Károly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Altaic StudiesEgyetem str. 2.
University of Szeged H-6722 Szeged, Hungary
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/869D81C5
Fingerprint: 1E61 3205 8F5A 87E7 1269 3396 1C63
/nc6120/xorg-6.8.2-i810.patch
Best, Laci
- --
László Károly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Altaic StudiesEgyetem str. 2.
University of Szeged H-6722 Szeged, Hungary
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/869D81C5
Fingerprint: 1E61 3205 8F5A 87E7 1269
supported by
x11-servers/xorg-server-snap. However it does not work well with either
graphics/dri-devel or dri from cvs (as of today).
Any idea?
Best, Laci
- --
László Károly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Altaic StudiesEgyetem str. 2.
University of Szeged
pci0: display at device 2.1 (no driver attached)
If I have drm loaded after boot time (by X.org) there will be agpgart
but no dri/cardX...
Best, Laci
- --
László Károly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Altaic StudiesEgyetem str. 2.
University of Szeged
://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80396 (Problem Report
kern/80396 : [agp] i915 AGP not supported).
Best, Laci
- --
László Károly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Altaic StudiesEgyetem str. 2.
University of Szeged H-6722 Szeged, Hungary
PGP
=pinsys
Best, Laci
- --
László Károly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Altaic StudiesEgyetem str. 2.
University of Szeged H-6722 Szeged, Hungary
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/869D81C5
Fingerprint: 1E61 3205 8F5A 87E7 1269 3396 1C63 F9FF 869D
object libc.so.6 not found, required by nppdf.so]
why is that?
and what is exactly that i should do.
I am using FreeBSD 5.4 Stable
thank you
Have you edited /etc/libmap.conf? It is needed for linuxpluginwrapper.
Best, Laci
- --
László Károly [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Olsson wrote:
| I recently upgraded from 5.2.1-p{something} to 5.3-p5. The system
| seems fine after the upgrade, but I have one problem.
|
| The reason for the upgrade to 5.3 was to be able to compile
| OpenOffice, but when I tried to do that I
15 matches
Mail list logo