RE: serious packet routing issue causing ntpd high load?

2011-11-03 Thread Li, Qing
. In any case, I can reproduce the issue consistently and just trying to get a few uninterrupted hours to get it done. --Qing From: Alexander V. Chernikov [melif...@freebsd.org] Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 6:43 AM To: Steven Hartland Cc: Li, Qing

RE: serious packet routing issue causing ntpd high load?

2011-10-11 Thread Li, Qing
[mailto:kill...@multiplay.co.uk] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 2:51 AM To: Li, Qing; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: li...@multiplay.co.uk Subject: Re: serious packet routing issue causing ntpd high load? - Original Message - From: Li, Qing qing...@bluecoat.com RTM_MISS: Lookup

RE: serious packet routing issue causing ntpd high load?

2011-10-05 Thread Li, Qing
Hi, RTM_MISS: Lookup failed on this address: len 184, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, flags:DONE locks: inits: sockaddrs: DST ::A.B.C.D Would it be possible for you to email me what exactly does ::A.B.C.D map into WRT your system or infrastructure ? And are you able to share your ifconfig -a

RE: IPv6 / ndp taking a long time to resolve in this weeks STABLE

2011-04-13 Thread Li, Qing
I haven't modified the ndp related code for quite a long time, but recently have seen some postings regarding incomplete ndp entries (still catching up on emails). Changes committed in the past year or so were related to locking and memory leak, not functional updates. I have seen this issue

Re: upd: 7.2-8.1 many networks trouble flowtable

2010-11-24 Thread Li, Qing
I am the main author of this paper you referenced in your email. The main discussion and focus of my paper was on the design and work done to separate L2 and L3 for both IPv4 and IPv6 to facilitate the elimination of GIANT lock in the networking subsystem, thus achieving high parallelism.

RE: upd: 7.2-8.1 many networks trouble flowtable

2010-11-24 Thread Li, Qing
as we speak. In addition, we are considering other enhancements for the routing code. Cheers, -- Qing From: Andrey Groshev [mailto:gre...@yartv.ru] Sent: Wed 11/24/2010 4:04 AM To: Li, Qing Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upd: 7.2-8.1 many

RE: upd: 7.2-8.1 many networks trouble flowtable

2010-11-24 Thread Li, Qing
snip Here's an example of where disabling the flowtable solved a user's problem in October 2010: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=18301 snip Additionally I remember 2 or 3 posts to mailing lists here discussing how bgpd was taking up 100% CPU (or specifically an entire CPU

RE: if_rtdel: error 47 (netgraph or mpd issue?)

2010-09-08 Thread Li, Qing
I am working with Mike offline. -- Qing -Original Message- From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:m...@sentex.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:35 AM To: Vlad Galu Cc: Li, Qing; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_rtdel: error 47 (netgraph or mpd issue?) At 11:30 AM 9/8/2010

RE: if_rtdel: error 47

2010-09-01 Thread Li, Qing
Hi, Without seeing your mpd link configuration, I am guessing the IP address of all of the local end points of your ppp links is the same IP address. If that's the case, the error message is harmless. The reason being, for ppp links and in pre 8.0 release, if you try pinging the local end IP

RE: if_rtdel: error 47

2010-09-01 Thread Li, Qing
Hi, Thanks for looking! Yes, they are the same. However, I dont see this error on the other box which does not have ipv6 negotiation on the line (set bundle enable ipv6cp). Only since enabling ipv6 negotiation and oddly enough only after a few days did the error start

RE: patch: bad ipv6 neighbor solicitation

2009-12-15 Thread Li, Qing
Thanks for reporting back. I asked you for a routing table dump in my previous email, would you mind emailing it to me privately? -- Qing -Original Message- From: Tom Pusateri [mailto:pusat...@bangj.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:28 PM To: Li, Qing Cc: freebsd

RE: patch: bad ipv6 neighbor solicitation

2009-12-15 Thread Li, Qing
...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Li, Qing Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:46 PM To: Tom Pusateri Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: patch: bad ipv6 neighbor solicitation Thanks for reporting back. I asked you for a routing table dump in my previous email, would you mind

net/mpd5, ppp, proxy-arp issues

2009-12-15 Thread Li, Qing
Hi, Recently there have been several reports regarding issues with ppp, mpd5 and proxy-arp configuration over the ppp links. I read through the various postings and the problems seem to be: 1. Unable to add proxy-arp entries for the remote ppp clients. 2. Log showing ifa_add_loopback_route:

RE: IPv6 - bad neighbor solicitation messages

2009-12-14 Thread Li, Qing
Please email me your routing table privately, but I am suspecting the following temporary patch would fix your issue. Please give it a try and report back. http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/nd6-ns.diff -- Qing -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org

patch: bad ipv6 neighbor solicitation

2009-12-14 Thread Li, Qing
apply the patch and report back. Thanks, -- Qing -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Li, Qing Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 3:00 PM To: Dennis Glatting; JASSAL Aman Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org Subject: RE

RE: proxy arp and MPD in RELENG_8

2009-12-11 Thread Li, Qing
it supports to. Please give it a try and report back. Thanks, -- Qing -Original Message- From: Li, Qing Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 10:31 PM To: Li, Qing; Mario Pavlov; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd- curr...@freebsd.org Subject: RE: proxy arp and MPD in RELENG_8 Hi

RE: IPv6 - bad neighbor solicitation messages

2009-12-10 Thread Li, Qing
I haven't made any significant changes in the IPv6 code for 3 months now. Could you please get a packet capture and email it to me? Thanks, -- Qing From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org on behalf of Tom Pusateri Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 7:15 PM To:

RE: proxy arp and MPD in RELENG_8

2009-12-10 Thread Li, Qing
-curr...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- curr...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Li, Qing Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:04 PM To: Mario Pavlov; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd- curr...@freebsd.org Subject: RE: proxy arp and MPD in RELENG_8 Let me look into this issue and work

RE: proxy arp and MPD in RELENG_8

2009-12-09 Thread Li, Qing
Let me look into this issue and work with you offline. I have been quite busy with day job and just starting to slowly resume my FreeBSD work. -- Qing -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org on behalf of Mario Pavlov Sent: Wed 12/9/2009 11:01 AM To:

RE: NFS issues on 8.0-BETA4

2009-09-12 Thread Li, Qing
Hi Doug, Simply adding -o udp to my mount command made the NFS mount work correctly. Qing, would it be beneficial to attempt the patch in light of these findings? Have you tried the patch that I sent you privately? Does it work for you? Thanks, -- Qing

RE: NFS issues on 8.0-BETA4

2009-09-11 Thread Li, Qing
I cannot sucessfully mount exports from the NFSv3 server on the 8.0-BETA4 client. All works well with 7.2 clients. The strange thing is, the directory in which I mount the nfs filesystem disappears, and I get an error when I attempt to access the directory. This may be a known

RE: 8.0-BETA3/IPv6: route: bad keyword: cloning

2009-09-04 Thread Li, Qing
Upon booting an 8.0-BETA3 system with IPv6 enabled, I saw this in the console boot output: route: bad keyword: cloning usage: route [-dnqtv] command [[modifiers] args] This looks like it's from line 1062/1063 of /etc/network.subr v1.195.2.4. This system is not an IPv6 router, so do

RE: 8.0-BETA3/IPv6: route: bad keyword: cloning

2009-09-04 Thread Li, Qing
...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Li, Qing Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 11:15 AM To: Jeff Blank; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: RE: 8.0-BETA3/IPv6: route: bad keyword: cloning Upon booting an 8.0-BETA3 system with IPv6 enabled, I saw

RE: 8.0-BETA1 - for the record - different paths followed by IPv4 and IPv6 for 'local' connections

2009-07-22 Thread Li, Qing
-Original Message- From: Henri Hennebert [mailto:h...@restart.be] Sent: Sat 7/11/2009 3:09 AM To: Li, Qing Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-BETA1 - for the record - different paths followed by IPv4 and IPv6 for 'local' connections Li, Qing wrote

RE: 8.0-BETA1 - for the record - different paths followed by IPv4 and IPv6 for 'local' connections

2009-07-12 Thread Li, Qing
The patch has been committed, svn revision 195643. Thanks, -- Qing -Original Message- From: Henri Hennebert [mailto:h...@restart.be] Sent: Sat 7/11/2009 3:09 AM To: Li, Qing Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-BETA1 - for the record - different

RE: 8.0-BETA1 - for the record - different paths followed by IPv4 and IPv6 for 'local' connections

2009-07-10 Thread Li, Qing
Hi, Please try patch-7-10 in my home directory http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/ and let me know how it works out for you. I thought I had committed the patch but turned out I didn't. On 8.0-BETA1 there is an assymetry: netstat -rn display 192.168.24.1 link#3 no entry for