Re: Intel I210 (igb) sometimes consume all CPU on not-so-big traffic — need help!

Is device polling enabled? - M On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > I still have problems with my E-1220v3 server equipped with Intel I210 > adapter. It can not be loaded more than 100Mbit/s because it is > connection to internet. > > But sometimes

Re: Installer on serial-console-only-embedded system

You need to change /etc/ttys to turn off the virtual consoles and turn on a serial terminal. E.g., ttyv0 /usr/libexec/getty Pc xterm off secure # Virtual terminals ttyv1 /usr/libexec/getty Pc xterm off secure ttyv2 /usr/libexec/getty Pc xterm off secure ttyv3

Re: Serious (ha-ha) bug in 4.9-RELEASE

Brian T. Schellenberger wrote: OTOH, the fact that nobody seems to have noticed until after 4.9 was released is a pretty strong argument that not very many people care--unless of course :-) Ag! It was a stupid fscking idea to make arbitrary changes to something that hadn't really

Re: opie bug or ..?

Forgive the top-post -- I have independently verified this, suggest you open a PR. This is definitely a bug in opiepasswd. It is also present in RELENG_4_8. Regards, Michael Sergey Sysoev wrote: Hi. I have a question related to freebsd opie implementation. I am running 4.9-RELEASE and I've

Re: ipfw2/dummynet + ipfilter not working together ?

Artur Pydo wrote: pipe 1 config bw 125Kbit/s queue 10 pipe 2 config bw 125Kbit/s queue 10 queue 10 config queue 16kByte weight 100 pipe 1 mask all queue 11 config queue 24kByte weight 1 pipe 1 gred 0.02/3/6/0.06 queue 20 config queue 16kByte weight 100 pipe 2 mask all queue 21 config queue

Re: Mail selection options in sysinstall(8).

Tom Rhodes wrote: Due to legal issues, qmail was not added to the selection. Sorry. What legal issues? It seems entirely possible to produce a license-compliant var-qmail package for FreeBSD. It would be nice to offer it as the default MTA. ___

Re: Please confirm: Re: Thank you!

Gerald Combs wrote: This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (TMDA). Even TMDA has shit for brains! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Interference is preventing the card from transmitting, causing packets to accumulate in the outgoing queue. Dummynet queues with RED might help -- changing the behavior from tail dropping to early detection may improve performance. To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: wi0 and mtu setting

David Magda wrote: Evren Yurtesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I wonder how come wi driver doesnt let me to set mtu higher than 1500 even though I know the card supports it? Because the maximum size of the data poriton in a frame for 10Mbit and 100Mbit Ethernet is 1500. That makes no sense

PR 37395 - even with NO_SENDMAIL=true, /usr/sbin/sendmail overwritten

What's the deal with this? This puppy broke a couple of my machines by overwriting /var/qmail/bin/sendmail via the symlink in /usr/sbin. Ack. Pppt. There should be a single switch to disable sendwhale. I'll reiterate that the make.conf switches are no substitute for packagizing the

Re: -STABLE was stable for long time (Re: FreeBSD: Server or DesktopOS?)

Richard Caley wrote: Basicly, you can't have somethign which is stable and which gets fixed quickly, the two aims are in opposition. Something which gets fixed quickly is one definition of stability -- the addition of new features is its opposite. Deciding when a proposed change is defect

Re: Opera for FreeBSD

Doesn't seem to be able to find the jre (/usr/local/jdk1.3.1/jre). Solutions? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message

Re: Brazil time zone file sets DST incorrectly

Christopher Vance wrote: And in case you didn't notice, timezones have nothing to do with security - you should be using NTP and UTC for everything that is tied to security. Back to school for you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of

Re: 4.5 and mpd no buffer space available on high load ??

Andrew Reilly wrote: I ran a script using jot to send ping packets across the link, with sizes varying from 1300 to 2300 bytes, while also watching the link with tcpdump. Only one ping failed (it didn't even get out), with the following error message: ping: sendto: Message too long I

Re: Unable to alias IP's in 4.5

R. David Murray wrote: On Mon, 6 May 2002, Ian wrote: What changed is that the code now enforces that you do it the right way, which is to use 255.255.255.255 as the netmask for the alias IPs. That is, use the normal/proper netmask for the primary IP for that NIC, then use 255.255.255.255 for

Re: FreeBSD security hole?

Mike Meyer wrote: Well, I handle my own mail, and *I* certainly got it. I even chmod'ed /usr/bin/keyinit to close the known hole this bug created. This just occurred to me -- it isn't possible that this is being routed through an MTA whose A and PTR records don't match, is it? To

Re: FreeBSD security hole?

Mike Meyer wrote: Well, I handle my own mail, and *I* certainly got it. I even chmod'ed /usr/bin/keyinit to close the known hole this bug created. I handle my own mail and didn't receive it. Isn't in the mailing list archive, either. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: UDP problems in 4.5-STABLE

Dave Hayes wrote: Nasrudin was driving a friend in his car at a spanking pace. Suddenly, glimpsing a signpost, the friend called out Mulla, we're going in the wrong direction! Why don't you ever think of something good? came the reply. Just look, for instance, at the speed we are going at.

Re: recent networking troubles

Peter Schultz wrote: At system boot I see this message twice: Starting final network daemons:rpc.umntall: 10.0.0.103: RPCPROG_MNT: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to send That's normal -- your pccard stuff probably hasn't settled down yet, but you've got nfs compiled into the kernel

Re: Firewall config non-intuitiveness

Nate Williams wrote: See above. It can easily be done in a more standard way. (One can argue that the '-z' should be the default flag, but so far I've failed to convince Warner of this fact. :) :) Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but the pccard_ether script (when last I looked at

Re: Firewall config non-intuitiveness

Michael Sierchio wrote: Nate Williams wrote: See above. It can easily be done in a more standard way. (One can argue that the '-z' should be the default flag, but so far I've failed to convince Warner of this fact. :) :) Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but the pccard_ether

Re: Multiple Aironet adapters

Stoian Mishinev wrote: I have strange problem, about mount or 2 ago I've tried 2 aironet cards on the same machine running FreeBSD one to our wireless network and the other to my home network with success. How do you define success? Having two transceivers in immediate proximity is