___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
After updating to 12-STABLE I am getting kernel panics when re-starting the
jail service. Here's a backtrace:
#6 0x8108696f in trap_pfault (frame=0xfe00216682c0,
usermode=, signo=, ucode=)
at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:739
#7 0x81085fb6 in trap
On 2019-09-05 21:25, Warner Losh wrote:
Please file a PR.
Ideally, if you could connect to /var/run/devd.pipe before starting the
scrub and including the output on 10 and 12, that would be great.
Thanks!
Here's the PR:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240411
Hi,
I have this in my devd rules:
notify 10 {
match "system" "ZFS";
match "type""misc.fs.zfs.scrub_start";
action "touch /var/run/scrub_$pool_name; logger -t ZFS 'zpool $pool_name
started scrubbing'";
};
While this is working OK on FreeBSD-10, on
On 05/16/2017 04:26 PM, Eric A. Borisch wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:31 AM, Trond Endrestøl <
trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no> wrote:
I guess you had a /boot/zfs/zpool.cache file referring to the original
zroot pool. Next, the kernel found the vega pool and didn't realise
these two
On 05/16/2017 05:08 PM, Fabian Keil wrote:
Why did you use the -f flag? Unless you can reproduce the
problem without it, it's not obvious to me that this is a
bug.
If you boot from another system, there is no other way to
import a pool than using "import -f". So, I guess it is
part of normal
Fix the e-mail subject
On 05/15/2017 08:09 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hi everybody,
While trying to rename a zpool from zroot to vega,
I ended up in this strange situation:
nik@vega:~ % zfs list -t all
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
vega1.83G 34.7G
Hi everybody,
While trying to rename a zpool from zroot to vega,
I ended up in this strange situation:
nik@vega:~ % zfs list -t all
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
vega1.83G 34.7G96K /zroot
vega/ROOT 1.24G 34.7G96K none
vega/ROOT/default
Hi,
While trying to create a big tar file containing big files, I got this:
root@m4fh1:/home/nik/peter # tar -cf - . | tar -tf - /dev/null
tar: Damaged tar archive
tar: Retrying...
tar: Damaged tar archive
tar: Retrying...
tar: Damaged tar archive
tar: Retrying...
tar: Damaged tar archive
tar:
Hi,
I just noticed that my CPU's frequency doesn't support dropping
below 1200MHz. It used to be able to go down to 150MHz, if I am
not mistaken. I'd like it to go down to 600MHz via powerd, like
it used to go. This is a month's old 10-STABLE.
[nik@moby ~]$ sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq_levels
On 05/22/15 09:42, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
Try changing the options in /boot/device.hints
hint.acpi_throttle.0.disabled=0
hint.p4tcc.0.disabled=0
Thanks Ivan, now it works as it did before!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On 11/22/2012 6:00 AM, Morgan Reed wrote:
Hi All,
Hi,
[snipped content]
Any suggestions here?
A quick one. Could you make a try using ipfw nat instead of natd?
I am not sure about divert socket and natd per jail, but NATing using
ipfw and libalias(which natd uses as well) works.
HTH, Nikos
On 5/31/2012 2:09 PM, Jason Leschnik wrote:
A freebsd-update + portsnap + portupgrade is really quick...
ah, ok!
I even wrote this little script to check for pkg_updating info:
http://leschnik.me/blog/?p=79
Note that if you have many out of date ports this script can take a while to
On 5/31/2012 5:41 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Furthermore, when upgrading the CARP Master firewall, we need to plan
with the Project Manager a failover to the CARP Backup firewall.
Yes, I know about pfsync, yes, we use it, no, it doesn't *instantly*
sync sessions for PF.
A bit offtopic on this
On 10/22/2011 3:04 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 22/10/2011 12:49, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 22.10.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Nikos Vassiliadis:
On 10/21/2011 5:08 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
- VIMAGE and mpd don't like each other, so VIMAGE was out as well
Could you explain please? In my limited
On 10/21/2011 5:08 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
- VIMAGE and mpd don't like each other, so VIMAGE was out as well
Could you explain please? In my limited testing they seem to get along
fine:)
I have also used tun and /usr/sbin/ppp to do ppp over ssh from a vnet
jail to a remote host, admittedly
Hi,
My system have two non-responding processes after some truss(1)ing
i did on them. They seem stopped and do not respond to sigcont.
%ps
PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND
9768 0- I 0:00.12 truss -p 9739
9514 1 Is 0:00.29 -csh (csh)
9739 1 TX+2:06.24 sqlite3
On 9/27/2011 1:10 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
kill -9 your truss processes; the underlying processes which you are
truss'ing will probably resume.
My experience for years has been that truss on FreeBSD is extremely
buggy and cannot be relied upon (case in point). Such is still the case
on
Hi,
A new box I have installed cannot dump core. It seems hung,
I cannot cannot break into the debugger, after calling doadump().
Physical memory: 943 MB
Dumping 60MB:
This is 8.2-RELEASE-p1.
It has this (probably cheap) SATA controller, in case it matters:
atapci1@pci0:0:31:1:
On 2/21/2011 11:30 PM, Etienne Robillard wrote:
KLD ipfw.ko: depends on libalias - not available or version mismatch
linker_load_file: Unsupported file type
Try a:
touch sys/netinet/ipfw/*.c sys/netinet/libalias/*.c
env NO_CLEAN=1 make kernel
Does this fix the problem?
Nikos
On 2/4/2011 2:35 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Even if I can't concatenate my 2 lagg interfaces into a failover one
over the 2 switches, the new setup will still be an improvement.
Did you consider using STP? Are these switches RSTP capable?
You could create a low priority bridge acting as leaf
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
root filesystem is remounted read write only for some configuration
changes, then remounted back to read only.
Does this work reliably for you? I tried doing the remounting trick,
both for root and /usr, back in the 4.x time frame. And could never
get it to work -
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 01:15:18 Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hello list!
When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK:
-
bs1% uname -a
FreeBSD bs1.sp34.ru 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun May 25
20:15:26 MSD 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BSM
Hi,
While loading snd_ich, the kernel prints the message on the subject.
I haven't noticed any problems; Is it something to worry about?
That's on 7-STABLE and the hardware is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:31:5: class=0x040100 card=0xe0018086 chip=0x24d58086
rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
vendor =
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 16:56:00 Brett Glass wrote:
At 08:40 AM 10/31/2007, Alexander Motin wrote:
Brett Glass wrote:
ng_nat is part of 6-STABLE
I've checked, and there is indeed a version there. But it's a
much older version without many useful option flags. ng_car
is not there
On Monday 29 October 2007 00:22:34 Brett Glass wrote:
I would like to request that some useful work on networking be MFCed
from -CURRENT to -STABLE in time for the release of FreeBSD 6.3. In
particular, I'd like to see some of the Netgraph nodes which are new or
which have seen extensive
On Monday 24 September 2007 20:58, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand is why timer rate on each cpu is 1995? I have
set it to 1000, not 1995 or 2000. I have seen it showing 2000 on
another box.
So
1) why not 1000?
DOUBLING
I can only make assumptions about the doubling, and I
On Tuesday 25 September 2007 12:13, Artem Kuchin wrote:
I have dual CPU with HT. If i turn on HT (and it does help in my case)
it shoud 2000 int x4 = 8000 ints per second. SO, i have saved 200
int/second from NIC and got myself 8000 ints/second from timer.
This kind of load(200intrs/s) earns
On Sunday 17 June 2007 00:24, Artem Kuchin wrote:
Maybe someone can englighten me when
inode change time changes? What must be done
with file to change it (except writing to it)?
stat(2) would be very enlightening in this context.
I tried chmoding - it does not affect inode time.
chmod
Redirecting from @net to @stable. Please,
remove @net from future mails.
On Monday 28 May 2007 11:54, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On Monday 28 May 2007 10:57, Julian Elischer wrote:
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On Tuesday 22 May
On Friday 25 May 2007 15:05, Stephen Clark wrote:
We have a person that is testing the both system inhouse surfing out
over the internet on our T1 link and he complains that he is consistently
seeing the 6.1 version being much slower than the
4.9 version (on the same hardware).
FreeBSD cannot
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 14:47, Richard wrote:
Hi there!
I am looking for a solution for a small problem regarding a high
availability setup.
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
IP-adresses and I am able to see that a
'/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server
Hello,
In my 6.2-PRERELEASE(one month old approximately) truss gets stuck exiting
when trying to truss a non existing file. I think the problem is not in truss
itself.
But I have not the skills to find it. So, will a build with updated sources
help?
Is there anybody else with the same problem?
On Thursday 16 November 2006 14:14, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 12:26:32PM +0300, Oleg Dambaev wrote:
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hello,
In my 6.2-PRERELEASE(one month old approximately) truss gets stuck exiting
when trying to truss a non existing file. I think
On Monday 16 October 2006 16:54, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I need to 'kldunload -f drm' in order to go into suspend to ram
with my thinkpad (suspend works fine with dri disabled).
Unfortunately, despite the claims of the manpage the '-f' flag
does not alter the behaviour of the kldunload tool.
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 16:53, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On Monday 16 October 2006 16:54, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I need to 'kldunload -f drm' in order to go into suspend to ram
with my thinkpad (suspend works fine with dri disabled).
Unfortunately, despite the claims
On Friday 06 October 2006 07:57, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 00:40:14 +0200
Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now my question what can I do ? Are there any kind of technics to
_downgrad_ a STABLE ?
Hi Albert,
this was discussed in -questions@ on September 27th.
On Thursday 06 July 2006 22:46, Anton Nikiforov wrote:
Dear all.
[snip]
That means that in case some service (provided by jail managed by
freevrrpd) will be accessed from outside - i cannot be sure what host
will answer the request.
You have vrrp on jails and carp on the host system?
That's
On Monday 15 May 2006 15:00, gareth wrote:
hi, this box has had far too many hard reboots, but can anyone shed some
light on whether this's inconsistent? i boot into single user mode,
everything is mounted read-only,
run fsck and fix all the partitions. rerunning fsck shows no more
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 16:50, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
I know 4.9 is ancient history, but unfortunately we have several
thousand sites installed. We are in the process of moving to 6.1 when it
is released.
Right now I have an immediate problem where we are going to install two
40 matches
Mail list logo
