Re: 9.2-PRE: switch off that stupid Nakatomi Socrates

2013-09-30 Thread Phil Regnauld
Teske, Devin (Devin.Teske) writes: Nice, but how does it handle if a Makefile contains a love target? Right, bmake gives us all the chance to implement love in our own unuque way ;D ^^ Is that halfway between eunuch and unique love ? Yes, it's off topic at this

Re: 9.2-PRE: switch off that stupid Nakatomi Socrates

2013-09-28 Thread Phil Regnauld
Teske, Devin (Devin.Teske) writes: If you work seriously on serious issues long enough... you'll become burned- out. Let me just come right out and say it... I coded it. And thanks, you got me chuckling - nice to see some humor once in a while. To the offended poster:

Re: Musings on ZFS Backup strategies

2013-03-02 Thread Phil Regnauld
Karl Denninger (karl) writes: I think I'm going to play with this and see what I think of it. One thing that is very attractive to this design is to have the receiving side be a mirror, then to rotate to the vault copy run a scrub (to insure that both members are consistent at a checksum

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?

2012-06-01 Thread Phil Regnauld
Daniel Kalchev (daniel) writes: It will sure be interesting to learn what people avoid to use FreeBSD for. * full virtualization I am using VirtualBox in production with HAST + ZVOLs, but we need something like DRBD's dual master mode to be able to do a

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?

2012-06-01 Thread Phil Regnauld
David Magda (dmagda) writes: On Jun 1, 2012, at 09:12, Phil Regnauld wrote: * Gluster For very large FSes, nothing beats it, especially now that 3.3 has been released. Isilon built their OneFS on top of FreeBSD, does that count? :) Panasas too IIRC. Good pointers

Re: kvm virtio performance

2012-05-01 Thread Phil Regnauld
Bane Ivosev (bane.ivosev) writes: hi, anyone test freebsd as guest on kvm with virtio drivers? any expirience? http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-28916.html Cheers, Phil ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Issue with hast replication

2012-03-17 Thread Phil Regnauld
Mikolaj Golub (to.my.trociny) writes: I just tried to reproduce this and failed. For me a new recource was added without problems on reload. Mar 17 20:04:24 kopusha hastd[52678]: Reloading configuration... Mar 17 20:04:24 kopusha hastd[52678]: Keep listening on address 0.0.0.0:7771. Mar

Re: Issue with hast replication

2012-03-13 Thread Phil Regnauld
Mikolaj Golub (to.my.trociny) writes: Ok. So it is send(2). I suppose the network driver could generate the error. Did you tell what network adaptor you had? Not yet. bce0: HP NC382i DP Multifunction Gigabit Server Adapter (C0) mem 0xf400-0xf5ff irq 16 at device 0.0

Re: Issue with hast replication

2012-03-13 Thread Phil Regnauld
Mikolaj Golub (to.my.trociny) writes: What about failed counters like mbuf_alloc_failed_count, dma_map_addr_rx_failed_count, dma_map_addr_tx_failed_count? dev.bce.0.l2fhdr_error_count: 0 dev.bce.0.mbuf_alloc_failed_count: 0 dev.bce.0.mbuf_frag_count: 0

Re: Issue with hast replication

2012-03-12 Thread Phil Regnauld
Phil Regnauld (regnauld) writes: 7) ktrace on the destination dd: fstat(0,{ mode=p- ,inode=5,size=16384,blksize=4096 }) = 0 (0x0) lseek(0,0x0,SEEK_CUR)ERR#29 'Illegal seek' [...] Illegal seek, eh ? Any clues ? The boxes

Re: Issue with hast replication

2012-03-12 Thread Phil Regnauld
Mikolaj Golub (to.my.trociny) writes: It looks like in the case of hastd this was send(2) who returned ENOMEM, but it would be good to check. Could you please start synchronization again, ktrace primary worker process when ENOMEM errors are observed and show output here? Ok, took a

Issue with hast replication

2012-03-11 Thread Phil Regnauld
Hi, I've got a fairly simple setup: two hosts running 9.0-R (will upgrade to stable if told to, but want to check here first), ZFS and HAST. HAST is configured to run on top of zvols configured on each host, as illustrated: FS FS +--+

Re: Issue with hast replication

2012-03-11 Thread Phil Regnauld
Mikolaj Golub (trociny) writes: PR Mar 11 02:02:30 h1 hastd[2282]: [hvol] (primary) Disconnected from tcp4://192.168.1.200. PR Mar 11 02:02:30 h1 hastd[2282]: [hvol] (primary) Unable to write synchronization data: Cannot allocate memory. PR Mar 11 02:02:41 h1 hastd[2282]: [hvol]

Re: gmirror(8) and graid3(8) changes.

2006-03-07 Thread Phil Regnauld
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:28:44PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: Hi. Here you can find patches with changes to gmirror(8) and graid3(8): http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/gmirror.7.patch http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/graid3.patch Hi Pawel,

Re: gmirror(8) and graid3(8) changes.

2006-03-07 Thread Phil Regnauld
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:16:36PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: + +I've been experiencing lockups with gmirror, ATA/SATA on both +i386 and amd64, under severe I/O (very heavily loaded Postgres DB). +This has been on several different machines (remotely located, with +no