Re: 12.1 release symbol incompatibility? [disregard report]

2019-09-19 Thread Sean Bruno
On 2019-09-19 00:21, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 03:05:34PM -0600, Sean Bruno wrote: >> If one installs 12.1 and tries to run a 12.0 release package (postgresql >> server for instance), it fails due to a missing symbol: >> >> # service postgre

12.1 release symbol incompatibility?

2019-09-18 Thread Sean Bruno
If one installs 12.1 and tries to run a 12.0 release package (postgresql server for instance), it fails due to a missing symbol: # service postgresql start /usr/local/bin/pg_ctl: Undefined symbol "stat@FBSD_1.5" I think this is a bug as we are supposed to support this kind of thing, right?

Re: efi and serial console

2019-07-19 Thread Sean Bruno
On 2019-07-19 13:58, mike tancsa wrote: > I installed a RELENG12 snapshot from July 11th and having a hard time > getting serial console to work. In the past, I would have something > simple like > > > ttyu0   "/usr/libexec/getty std.115200  vt100   on secure > > in /etc/ttys > > and in

Re: r334229 breaks build kernel

2018-05-27 Thread Sean Bruno
On 05/27/18 00:18, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > Looks simple mis-merge. > On hunk 1, original (head) r323831 has "hz / isc->quanta" at 2nd arg, > while r334229 (stable/11) has "hz / isc->quanta1". > > r334228 and before had "hz / isc->quanta - 1", so missingly removed > " - " instead of " - 1". > >

Re: ftpd in base

2018-05-20 Thread Sean Bruno
On 05/20/18 05:49, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > context: 11.2-BETA2 #0 r333924/amd64 > > I'm trying to get chrooted ftpd (in base) to write files uploaded to the > user dir as mode 666 (umask 111). I have a line in inetd.conf that looks > like this: > > ftp stream tcp nowait  root

Re: Silent data corruption on em(4) interfaces

2015-08-24 Thread Sean Bruno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/20/15 02:57, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: Hello! I got silent data corruption when transferring data via em(4) interface on 10.2-STABLE r286912. 1. I got broken large file transferred via ftp (MD5 checksum mismatched); 2. I got disconnects

Re: Possible Error in the FreeBSD 10.2 Release Notes/Man page for TCP

2015-08-12 Thread Sean Bruno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/12/15 15:43, Glen Barber wrote: On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 03:41:21PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On 08/12/15 15:15, Glen Barber wrote: On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:09:31PM -0500, dweimer wrote: I was reading through the Release notes, and decided

Re: Possible Error in the FreeBSD 10.2 Release Notes/Man page for TCP

2015-08-12 Thread Sean Bruno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/12/15 15:15, Glen Barber wrote: On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:09:31PM -0500, dweimer wrote: I was reading through the Release notes, and decided to enable net.inet.tcp.pmtud_blackhole_detection in my test environment. It appears that the

Re: Device timeout from mfi(9) while booting 9.2-RELEASE

2013-10-04 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 18:27 +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote: mfi0: 14299 (boot + 4s/0x0020/info) - Firmware version 3.190.05-1669 mfi0: 14300 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Package version 23.7.0-0029 mfi0: 14301 (boot + 5s/0x0020/info) - Board Revision Does it make sense then, to take a survey and

Re: Intel 10Gb network card

2013-09-10 Thread Sean Bruno
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 09:25 +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote: no man ix, no mention of /dev/ix%d in man ixgbe If you have a moment, can you submit a diff on this fact? It seems REALLY confusing to me. Sean signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [ATH] 9.2-PRERELEASE and wlan0 device disconnection

2013-08-17 Thread Sean Bruno
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 17:42 +0530, Tj wrote: (Sorry emailed from wrong address, re emailing) Hi, I just upgraded to 9.2-PRERELEASE from 9.1-RELEASE, I have not had this problem before with any version of freebsd however. I have an ATHEROS card (AR928X according to pciconf), things go fine

Re: bce and Warning: bootcode thinks driver is absent.

2013-07-26 Thread Sean Bruno
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 11:55 -0400, Larry Baird wrote: Recently under amd64 and 9.1-STABLE I am seeing issues with the bce driver. Message is Warning: bootcode thinks driver is absent. After this message, the box appears to be wedged. After rebooting, it got the same message during fsck. So

Re: Intel 82574 issue reported on Slashdot

2013-02-11 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 10:16 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: For those that may have run across the story on Slashdot about this NIC, here is our statement: Recently there were a few stories published, based on a blog post by an end-user, suggesting specific network packets may cause the Intel®

[stable 9]devd parse.y change

2012-10-09 Thread Sean Bruno
Bah, found a nit when buildworlding stable/9 on pc-bsd9 that Bruce pointed out 6 months ago? http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.current/142170 I'll patch this if there are no objections? Index: sbin/devd/parse.y === ---

stable/9 compile on pc-bsd9

2012-10-08 Thread Sean Bruno
this doesn't make any sense to me, but a buildworld seems to fail on pc-bsd9, but not on freebsd9. I wonder what's going on here? === usr.sbin/zzz (installincludes) -- stage 4.2: building libraries

Re: stable/9 panic Bad tailq NEXT(0xffffffff80e52660-tqh_last) != NULL

2012-10-02 Thread Sean Bruno
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 05:47 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: Can you add extra printfs to see where exactly attach is failing? I would start with the attach routine in sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib_pci.c: hrm ... interesting side effects. After adding my printf's I don't hit the panic any more.

Re: stable/9 panic Bad tailq NEXT(0xffffffff80e52660-tqh_last) != NULL

2012-10-02 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 14:06 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, October 02, 2012 3:05:30 pm Sean Bruno wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 05:47 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: Can you add extra printfs to see where exactly attach is failing? I would start with the attach routine in sys/dev

Re: stable/9 panic Bad tailq NEXT(0xffffffff80e52660-tqh_last) != NULL

2012-09-27 Thread Sean Bruno
pcib7: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 19 at device 28.7 on pci0 panic: Bad tailq NEXT(0x80e52660-tqh_last) != NULL cpuid = 0 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x37 panic() at panic+0x1d8 rman_init() at

Re: stable/9 panic Bad tailq NEXT(0xffffffff80e52660-tqh_last) != NULL

2012-09-27 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 10:52 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: pcib7: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 19 at device 28.7 on pci0 panic: Bad tailq NEXT(0x80e52660-tqh_last) != NULL cpuid = 0 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a kdb_backtrace

Re: Issue with igb and lagg (was Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd)

2012-09-12 Thread Sean Bruno
igb+lagg worked for us on 8.3. Haven't tried it since moving to 9.0 and 9-STABLE on those three boxes. igb+lagg doesn't work for him on 9.0. Although, I don't recall if non-LACP options were tried earlier in this thread, or if it's just the LACP mode that's failing. If one mode

Re: [stable 9] panic on reboot: ipmi_wd_event()

2012-08-02 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 13:34 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, August 01, 2012 6:48:48 pm Sean Bruno wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 05:53 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: Index: vfs_subr.c === --- vfs_subr.c (revision

Re: [stable 9] panic on reboot: ipmi_wd_event()

2012-08-01 Thread Sean Bruno
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 05:53 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: Index: vfs_subr.c === --- vfs_subr.c (revision 238969) +++ vfs_subr.c (working copy) @@ -1868,8 +1868,11 @@ sched_sync(void) continue;

Re: Regression in stable for ThinkPad T520 with Intel GPU (Sandybridge) between June 22 and July 18

2012-07-27 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:35 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: I will shortly spend a bit of time tracking down the breakage more closely, but my 9-Stable system of June 22 runs fine. After an update on about July 10, I noted that it would hang after Xorg was started, but usually worked. After an

dell r420/r320 stable/9

2012-07-26 Thread Sean Bruno
For the time being I had to revert the following from my stable/9 tree. Otherwise I would get a kernel panic on shutdown from ipmi(4). http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=237839 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=221121 I suspect that the ipmi device isn't

Re: Broadcom NetXtreme bcm5720 in the 9.1 beta

2012-07-25 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:46 -0700, Hiroki Sato wrote: Peter Feger magick...@gmail.com wrote in CAD_3y4wAPp+8ZSveB6mbOF7M1Ne-zAvz4Uf=vv9quohuu23...@mail.gmail.com: ma I just got done installing FreeBSD-9.0 on a Dell R720. I can tell you ma that none of the broadcom products will work.

Re: Broadcom NetXtreme bcm5720 in the 9.1 beta

2012-07-25 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 17:44 -0700, Jurgen Weber wrote: yes, it is only the NIC's I want/need. I have an Intel card in it right now, but its just a single port the onboard NIC's would be a nice to have. The raid worked out of the box for me, please remember 9.1beta thou. Thanks For the

Re: Broadcom NetXtreme bcm5720 in the 9.1 beta

2012-07-24 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 12:16 -0700, Peter Feger wrote: I just got done installing FreeBSD-9.0 on a Dell R720. I can tell you that none of the broadcom products will work. There is no driver that I have been able to find. I wound up having to replace them with Intel nics. I used the i350

[stable 9] panic on reboot: ipmi_wd_event()

2012-07-20 Thread Sean Bruno
Working on the Dell R420 today, got most of it working, even the broadcom ethernet cards! However, I get the following when I reboot the system: Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...4 Sleeping thread (tid 100107, pid 9) owns a non-sleepable lock KDB: stack backtrace of thread 100107: sched_switch()

Re: stable/9 panic Bad tailq NEXT(0xffffffff80e52660-tqh_last) != NULL

2012-07-20 Thread Sean Bruno
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 02:39 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 13/07/2012 19:31 Sean Bruno said the following: Well this is new. I haven't a clue what Dell has done on this R620, but this popped up today after I did a boat load of BIOS updates and tried to install stable/9 from our yahoo tree

stable/9 panic Bad tailq NEXT(0xffffffff80e52660-tqh_last) != NULL

2012-07-13 Thread Sean Bruno
Well this is new. I haven't a clue what Dell has done on this R620, but this popped up today after I did a boat load of BIOS updates and tried to install stable/9 from our yahoo tree. If anyone sees the obvious solution here, I'd love to figure it out. found- vendor=0x14e4, dev=0x165f,

Re: bge problems in RELENG_9, bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting

2012-07-13 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 12:06 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:59 -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: I grabbed these updates and applied them cleanly to stable/9 on a Dell R620 with a quad port BCM5720, I still see watchdog timeouts and reset indications. I am able to ping

Re: bge problems in RELENG_9, bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting

2012-07-12 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:59 -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: I grabbed these updates and applied them cleanly to stable/9 on a Dell R620 with a quad port BCM5720, I still see watchdog timeouts and reset indications. I am able to ping out of the box for a short amount of time before the

Re: Recommendation for Hyervisor to host FreeBSD

2012-07-10 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 04:43 -0700, Pete French wrote: So, my work surprise for a Thursday morning is an urgent requirement to see if we can run a set of FreeBSD machines under virtualised servers. I have not done this before personally, but I notice from post here that it doesnt seem uncommon,

Re: bge problems in RELENG_9, bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting

2012-07-09 Thread Sean Bruno
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 18:01 -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: here is a WIP version at the following URL. http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/bge/if_bge.c http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/bge/if_bgereg.h http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/bge/brgphy.c I have a couple of positive feedbacks but

Re: Network unavailable when booting directly to FreeBSD.

2012-06-21 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 12:05 -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; I noticed a regression from 9.0 and I cannot boot directly FreeBSD and access the network. Unfortunately I cannot recall the exact commit where this started happening. uname -a FreeBSD pcbsd-8555 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE

Re: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470

2012-06-14 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:25 -0700, Vladimir Vasilenko wrote: Hello. Can I use this video card with FreeBSD? If yes so, where I can driver download? Best regards, Vladimir Vasilenko vladi...@shumbely.com I don't know if anyone responded to your question here. I suspect that the latest

Re: FreeBSD and IPMI how-to (was Re: su problem)

2012-06-14 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 18:27 -0700, Matthew X. Economou wrote: Daniel Braniss writes: just for the record, serial on 8.x works fine! the device naming has changed from sio to uart, and maybe some features. We use it on all our servers, even redirecting it where possible via

Re: [stable 9] broken hwpstate calls

2012-06-06 Thread Sean Bruno
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 16:02 -0700, Jung-uk Kim wrote: Buy me a Bulldozer and I'll fix it for you! :-P Since I have one (FX-8150), do you want me to expose it to the internet and let you play with it? Sean ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Support for Intel 82599ES?

2012-06-01 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 10:45 -0700, Rick Miller wrote: BCM5720 I haven't gotten this working on my Dell R620 via bge(4), but we are actively working on it. Sean ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: bash 4.2 patchlevel 28

2012-05-31 Thread Sean Bruno
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 20:19 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:07:55PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: Noted that the following syntax is broken somewhere between 4.2 patchlevel 10 and 28. I'm sure its because we shouldn't be doing that over here at big purple, but we do

Re: Dell R620 Ethernet Ordering

2012-05-28 Thread Sean Bruno
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 13:52 -0700, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: Incidentally, does the broadcom driver in either 8 or 9 work for anyone? When I try to use an 8 or 9 compiled in the past week I get unusable networking that bounces up and down. I'm using an R620 with the quad-port broadcom

[stable 9]Dell R620 Ethernet Ordering

2012-05-27 Thread Sean Bruno
I'm trying to understand the newbus and acpi interactions on this Dell R620 that result in the Broadcom adapter board being probed backwards or just plain out of order in comparison to the connector layout and the linux tg3 driver. We seem to be detecting PCI0:2:0 before PCI0:1:0. This seems

stable/9 sandybridge reboot panic

2012-05-25 Thread Sean Bruno
Dell R620, getting pretty reliable panics here everytime I reboot. http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/sandybridge_reboot_panic.txt Sean ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To

Re: stable/9 sandybridge reboot panic

2012-05-25 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 14:04 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: Dell R620, getting pretty reliable panics here everytime I reboot. http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/sandybridge_reboot_panic.txt Sean ___ Verbose console boot ... interesting stuff

ports devel/tkcvs

2012-05-24 Thread Sean Bruno
Probably doing something wrong, but when I install tkcvs to get tkdiff on my box, the only thing it does is fire up and display a wish window. Did I do it wrong? :-) sean pkg_info |grep ^tk tk-8.5.11 Graphical toolkit for Tcl tk-wrapper-1.1_1Shell wrapper for wish (Tk)

bash 4.2 patchlevel 28

2012-05-24 Thread Sean Bruno
Noted that the following syntax is broken somewhere between 4.2 patchlevel 10 and 28. I'm sure its because we shouldn't be doing that over here at big purple, but we do ... and its a PITA. I'm bisecting to find out what is going on. test: VARIABLE=$(uname) bash: command substitution: line 3:

Re: bash 4.2 patchlevel 28

2012-05-24 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 13:07 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: Noted that the following syntax is broken somewhere between 4.2 patchlevel 10 and 28. I'm sure its because we shouldn't be doing that over here at big purple, but we do ... and its a PITA. I'm bisecting to find out what is going

Re: bash 4.2 patchlevel 28

2012-05-24 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 13:14 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 13:07 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: Noted that the following syntax is broken somewhere between 4.2 patchlevel 10 and 28. I'm sure its because we shouldn't be doing that over here at big purple, but we do ... and its

Re: [stable 9] broken hwpstate calls

2012-05-22 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 09:18 -0700, Jung-uk Kim wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-05-18 01:32:09 -0400, Sean Bruno wrote: Looks like my AMD box isn't quite working correctly with regards to P-states.I noted this repeating periodically: hwpstate0: set freq

Re: [stable-9] Touchpad mouse stopped working

2012-05-17 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 04:01 -0700, A.J. Fonz van Werven wrote: After moving from 9.0-RELEASE to 9-STABLE yesterday, the touchpad mouse on my netbook stopped working. When I do # /etc/rc.d/moused onestart the pointer appears and can be moved for a second or two, then it stops responding. Any

[stable 9] broken hwpstate calls

2012-05-17 Thread Sean Bruno
Looks like my AMD box isn't quite working correctly with regards to P-states.I noted this repeating periodically: hwpstate0: set freq failed, err 6 I noted these errors when setting the hwpstate verbose systctl on: May 17 22:28:32 Alice kernel: hwpstate0: set freq failed, err 6 May 17

Re: ATI Radeon 4250 in Dual Head Config?

2012-04-24 Thread Sean Bruno
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 08:29 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: My xorg.conf foo is pretty weak today. Does anyone have an ATI 4250 in a dual head config? I'd be interested in looking over your xorg.conf. Sean I note that xrandr just works now with this card after updating my ports of xorg

ATI Radeon 4250 in Dual Head Config?

2012-04-16 Thread Sean Bruno
My xorg.conf foo is pretty weak today. Does anyone have an ATI 4250 in a dual head config? I'd be interested in looking over your xorg.conf. Sean p.s. Mine at the moment, that doesn't work very well: http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/4250_xorg_conf.txt

Re: [stable-ish 9] Dell R815 ipmi(4) attach failure

2012-03-30 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 09:29 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:48:39 pm Sean Bruno wrote: Noting a failure to attach to the onboard IPMI controller with this dell R815. Not sure what to start poking at and thought I'd though this over here for comment. -bash-4.2

Re: [stable-ish 9] Dell R815 ipmi(4) attach failure

2012-03-30 Thread Sean Bruno
This is the relevant bits: Handle 0x2600, DMI type 38, 18 bytes IPMI Device Information Interface Type: KCS (Keyboard Control Style) Specification Version: 2.0 I2C Slave Address: 0x10 NV Storage Device: Not Present Base Address: 0x0CA8 (I/O)

[stable-ish 9] Dell R815 ipmi(4) attach failure

2012-03-29 Thread Sean Bruno
Noting a failure to attach to the onboard IPMI controller with this dell R815. Not sure what to start poking at and thought I'd though this over here for comment. -bash-4.2$ dmesg |grep ipmi ipmi0: KCS mode found at io 0xca8 on acpi ipmi1: IPMI System Interface on isa0 device_attach: ipmi1

Re: FreeBSD 9.0 release - memstick installation fails

2012-03-02 Thread Sean Bruno
You may want to try playing around with BIOS settings regarding USB. Sean On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 13:01 -0800, Kai Gallasch wrote: Hi list. Trying to install 9.0 release with a USB stick. I use FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img At first the bootup looks promising, but in the end it

Re: Odd reboot problems with 9.0-RELEASE i386

2012-01-19 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:06 -0800, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote: Hi all, I recently upgraded my 8.2-RELEASE box to 9.0-RELEASE using the old-fashioned cvsup way. I've run into a really strange situation. Everything went smoothly with the upgrade. I then deleted all my installed ports and

panic in bios32 ... stable/7

2012-01-18 Thread Sean Bruno
This probably applies to all releases, but for now I'm concentrating on stable/7. We have beta Dell r720 (12g) gear in the office and I suspect a broken EFI wrapped BIOS thing here, but freebsd definitely panics on startup. OK boot -v KDB: debugger backends: ddb KDB: current backend: ddb SMAP

Re: FreeBSD at Amazon EC2 status

2012-01-03 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 09:07 -0800, Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi lists, What´s is the current state of FreeBSD running on Amazon EC2 ? Is this stable ? Looking at Colin's status page (http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/) looks like there´s no active development on that. Does

Re: (Possible fix for sbp(4)) Re: Comment out sbp driver from GENERIC

2011-11-01 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 06:16 -0700, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: Dnia 18-10-2011 o 14:12:56 Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org napisał(a): On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek wkos...@freebsd.czest.pl wrote: Commenting a driver out is almost always a bad idea and should be done

Re: em0 hangs without any messages like Watchdog timeout only down/up reset it.

2011-03-10 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 03:03 -0800, Pete French wrote: I havent investigated far enough yet to see if this is the same problem, but I am also seeing hangs on em0 when under heavy load. This is 8-STABLE from the 17 at around 3pm. em0@pci0:0:25:0:class=0x02 card=0x281e103c

Re: kpanic on install 32GB of RAM [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-10-23 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 12:06 -0700, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:50:03AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 05:48 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 20/10/2010 21:28 Sean Bruno said the following: I guess, I could replace the kernel on the CD and have them

Re: kpanic on install 32GB of RAM [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-10-22 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 02:46 -0700, Ivan Voras wrote: On 10/21/10 21:06, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:50:03AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 05:48 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 20/10/2010 21:28 Sean Bruno said the following: I guess, I could replace

Re: kpanic on install on HP DL980/580

2010-10-22 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 12:06 -0700, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:50:03AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 05:48 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 20/10/2010 21:28 Sean Bruno said the following: I guess, I could replace the kernel on the CD and have them

Re: kpanic on install 32GB of RAM [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-10-21 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 05:48 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 20/10/2010 21:28 Sean Bruno said the following: I guess, I could replace the kernel on the CD and have them reburn it? That should work. BTW, here I described yet another way of building custom recovery/installation CDs that I use

Re: kpanic on install 32GB of RAM [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-10-20 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 06:01 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 1:16:07 am Andriy Gapon wrote: on 19/10/2010 06:11 Wilkinson, Alex said the following: Will it work something like http://freshmeat.net/projects/mcelog/ ? jhb has a port of this, yes. The relevant

Re: kpanic on install 32GB of RAM [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-10-20 Thread Sean Bruno
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 11:11 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 20/10/2010 21:05 Sean Bruno said the following: HP testers report that 7 nor 8 install without the kernel 'insta-panicing' across all CPUS at the same time. I'm going to ask that they try the latest 9 snap shot and then kill

Re: kpanic on install 32GB of RAM [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-10-20 Thread Sean Bruno
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 11:20 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 20/10/2010 21:16 Sean Bruno said the following: Huh ... did I miss it? I'm willing to try a lot. Perhaps then :-) This was my post: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.stable/72450/focus=72515 It had a link to a parallel

Re: kpanic on install 32GB of RAM

2010-10-18 Thread Sean Bruno
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:29 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 16/10/2010 02:41 Andriy Gapon said the following: on 15/10/2010 19:04 Sean Bruno said the following: So, trying to get a massively overpowered HP box up with 7.3 amd64 version up and running. I can't tell at the moment

Re: kpanic on install 32GB of RAM

2010-10-17 Thread Sean Bruno
We've successfully installed RHEL 5u4 on it, I'll fire that up and post the boot output shortly. Sean Perhaps this is something as simple as a hardware failure? HP DL980 looks sick, but I'm not sure. Here's the hardware logs, from the iLO on the box as screen scraping on the console is

Re: kpanic on install 32GB of RAM

2010-10-16 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:38 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:30 -0700, Boris Kochergin wrote: On 10/15/10 12:27, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:04:53AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: So, trying to get a massively overpowered HP box up with 7.3 amd64

Re: kpanic on install 32GB of RAM

2010-10-16 Thread Sean Bruno
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 13:16 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:52:00PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:38 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:30 -0700, Boris Kochergin wrote: On 10/15/10 12:27, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Oct

kpanic on install 32GB of RAM

2010-10-15 Thread Sean Bruno
So, trying to get a massively overpowered HP box up with 7.3 amd64 version up and running. I can't tell at the moment, but it looks like the installer kernel is having issues with 32GB of RAM in this box. Are we using the i386 kernel on amd64 installs? Sean

Re: kpanic on install 32GB of RAM

2010-10-15 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:30 -0700, Boris Kochergin wrote: On 10/15/10 12:27, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:04:53AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: So, trying to get a massively overpowered HP box up with 7.3 amd64 version up and running. I can't tell at the moment

Re: Unable to install 8.x on a PowerEdge R810

2010-07-29 Thread Sean Bruno
Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to break a few servers. This is a diff against -CURRENT, not stable-8 as I didn't get a chance to test it. It is directly based off of changes that peter@ made to the Yahoo FreeBSD 7 tree. I have compile and boot tested

Re: Unable to install 8.x on a PowerEdge R810

2010-07-29 Thread Sean Bruno
Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to break a few servers. This is a diff against -CURRENT, not stable-8 as I didn't get a chance to test it. It is directly based off of changes that peter@ made to the Yahoo FreeBSD 7 tree. I have compile and boot tested

Re: Unable to install 8.x on a PowerEdge R810

2010-07-23 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:51 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: Hi, Mahlon-- On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Mahlon E. Smith wrote: Install worked great, though it appears I need to keep hyperthreading (logical processors bios option) disabled for it to boot reliably. Similar errors as before if I

Re: Unable to install 8.x on a PowerEdge R810

2010-07-23 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:51 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: Hi, Mahlon-- On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Mahlon E. Smith wrote: Install worked great, though it appears I need to keep hyperthreading (logical processors bios option) disabled for it to boot reliably. Similar errors as before if I

Re: Unable to install 8.x on a PowerEdge R810

2010-07-23 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:51 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: Hi, Mahlon-- On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Mahlon E. Smith wrote: Install worked great, though it appears I need to keep hyperthreading (logical processors bios option) disabled for it to boot reliably. Similar errors as before if I

Re: Unable to install 8.x on a PowerEdge R810

2010-07-22 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:38 -0700, Mahlon E. Smith wrote: Picked up a couple of these powerhouse machines to be VirtualBox hosts. 24 core, 96G of RAM. Trying to put (amd64) both 8.0-RELEASE and 8.1-RC2 on it with no luck whatsoever so far. Any help provided would be greatly appreciated, I'm

Reporting Functional Server Models

2010-07-18 Thread Sean Bruno
I spent some time last week validating the 7, 8 and -CURRENT on different vendor hardware over here in my lab. Is there a current h/w compatibility list that folks are maintaining that I can update with my findings? Sean ___

Re: 8.x grudges

2010-07-07 Thread Sean Bruno
5. One of the upgraded systems would repeatedly hang at boot, until I disabled the on-board firewire-device through the BIOS... It was not a problem under 7.x, although I don't know, whether the device actually worked. This is a commonly-reported problem,

Re: 8.x grudges

2010-07-07 Thread Sean Bruno
5. One of the upgraded systems would repeatedly hang at boot, until I disabled the on-board firewire-device through the BIOS... It was not a problem under 7.x, although I don't know, whether the device actually worked. This is a commonly-reported problem,

Re: [stable 7] bge() related panic on an HP dl380g3 (32 bit)

2010-07-06 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 12:33 -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:24:23PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 12:11 -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:54:50AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: Started seeing this panic today from our BSD7 variant

[stable 7] bge() related panic on an HP dl380g3 (32 bit)

2010-07-02 Thread Sean Bruno
Started seeing this panic today from our BSD7 variant here at Yahoo. Our BGE driver is identical to 7stable at this time. Looks like all of these boxes are HP DL380G3 models. I have included the panic and pciconf -lv information. I assume that these machines have a variant of BGE that needs

Re: [stable 7] bge() related panic on an HP dl380g3 (32 bit)

2010-07-02 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 12:11 -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:54:50AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: Started seeing this panic today from our BSD7 variant here at Yahoo. Our BGE driver is identical to 7stable at this time. Looks like all of these boxes are HP DL380G3 models

[stable 7]config -g -ppp + kgmon causes deadlock

2010-06-22 Thread Sean Bruno
Not sure where to start poking about, but I'm seeing a dead lock on my boxes when the kernel is configured with -g -ppp. The dead lock occurs when I start profiling via kgmon -p. Any one else seeing this on 7? Sean ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: [Stable 7] CPIO breakage/

2010-06-18 Thread Sean Bruno
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 15:13 -0700, Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010/06/17 13:53, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2010-Jun-15 17:22:50 -0700, Xin LI delp...@delphij.net wrote: On 2010/06/15 17:05, Sean Bruno wrote: A little more background. It looks like

Re: [Stable 7] CPIO breakage/

2010-06-16 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 16:30 -0700, Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Sean, On 2010/06/15 15:10, Sean Bruno wrote: http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?limit_changes=0view=revisionrevision=208361 I'm not sure what's up with this update, but it hosed up

Re: [Stable 7] CPIO breakage/

2010-06-16 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 16:30 -0700, Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Sean, On 2010/06/15 15:10, Sean Bruno wrote: http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?limit_changes=0view=revisionrevision=208361 I'm not sure what's up with this update, but it hosed up

[Stable 7] CPIO breakage/

2010-06-15 Thread Sean Bruno
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?limit_changes=0view=revisionrevision=208361 I'm not sure what's up with this update, but it hosed up the default behavior of cpio. It appears now that -o won't do the same things that it used to: + cd / + find -x . + egrep -v

Re: [Stable 7] CPIO breakage/

2010-06-15 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 17:10 -0500, Sean Bruno wrote: http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?limit_changes=0view=revisionrevision=208361 I'm not sure what's up with this update, but it hosed up the default behavior of cpio. It appears now that -o won't do the same things that it used

Re: LORs in RELENG_7

2008-11-20 Thread Sean Bruno
by powering off your Firewire Hard Drive? What about pulling the cable out? -- Sean Bruno MiraLink Corporation 6015 NE 80th Ave, Ste 100 Portland, OR 97218 Cell 503-358-6832 Phone 503-621-5143 Fax 503-621-5199 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Google: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Missing fstab

2008-09-29 Thread Sean Bruno
Dan Allen wrote: In messing around trying to get a bootable FreeBSD system on a memory stick I messed up and deleted my fstab file on my main FreeBSD STABLE machine. Actually a script I was writing overwrote it... arrggghh. I feel so stupid. Anyway, my system now boots and then dies midway

[RELENG_6] Works Fine For Me!

2008-09-26 Thread Sean Bruno
/sbruno/bsd/6/sys/GENERIC i386 -- Sean Bruno MiraLink Corporation 6015 NE 80th Ave, Ste 100 Portland, OR 97218 Phone 503-621-5143 Fax 503-621-5199 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Google: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable

Re: regarding 1 Gig Chelsio SFP support

2008-09-25 Thread Sean Bruno
of lspci -v here so we can see if it's a card that should work, but doesn't. -- Sean Bruno MiraLink Corporation 6015 NE 80th Ave, Ste 100 Portland, OR 97218 Cell 503-358-6832 Phone 503-621-5143 Fax 503-621-5199 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Google: [EMAIL PROTECTED

stable/6 make and build errors

2008-08-29 Thread Sean Bruno
_mkdep18423: Permission denied mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /home/sbruno/bsd/6/lib/csu/i386-elf. *** Error code 1 Stop in /home/sbruno/bsd/6/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /home/sbruno/bsd/6. *** Error code 1 -- Sean Bruno MiraLink Corporation 6015 NE 80th Ave, Ste 100

Re: stable/6 make and build errors

2008-08-29 Thread Sean Bruno
Sean Bruno wrote: mkdep -f .depend -a-I/home/sbruno/bsd/6/lib/csu/i386-elf/../common -I/home/sbruno/bsd/6/lib/csu/i386-elf/../../libc/include /home/sbruno/bsd/6/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1.c /home/sbruno/bsd/6/lib/csu/i386-elf/crti.S /home/sbruno/bsd/6/lib/csu/i386-elf/crtn.S /usr/bin/mkdep

Re: stable/6 make and build errors

2008-08-29 Thread Sean Bruno
It's known that 'make clean' will occasionally not nuke all the necessary objects in /usr/obj/*. rm -fr /usr/obj/* is a better bet. Do not rely on 'make clean'. Oh? Should I look into why the make system isn't removing /usr/obj/ on a make clean and submit a patch? -- Sean Bruno

  1   2   >